September 21, 2018
It has been established by incontrovertible evidence in the matter of “The County” violating their Oaths of Office and that the so-called Government has functioned in constructive fraud.
The people of Humboldt County are owed Public Servants who uphold their Oaths to the law of the land, with the support of a Bond to uphold any lie-ability. The entire process of being sworn into office is designed to guarantee the acceptance of that role and responsibility—- and to assure the people of their elected and appointed official’s accountability to law and principles.
The immediate impact of this is the unlawful conversion from Public Law to private corporate law being practiced throughout the realm in otherwise Public Courts, the use of “legal” rather than “lawful” presumptions in these public, now private ‘hearings’ in the Planning Department, using unlawful conversion of private property into public property, enslavement and press-ganging of living men by a process of personage and impersonation, terrorist raids by Order Followers practicing “Nuisance” and “Abatement” procedures, and all the other evils we have witnessed.
This additionally means that “The County of Humboldt” has been functioning as a criminal organization since December of 1992 – when an “interim” county council director gave the ‘go-ahead’ to the elected and appointed representatives to turn in their Bonds that secured their official positions.
Exactly how and by whom this continued to be “pulled off” despite all the protections and provisions against it was not immediately apparent, but the Minutes of the December 15, 1992 BOS meeting provides the answer.
The 1992 BOS converted the mechanisms of Government and the Judicial System to the service of external authority, and adopted commerce as the form of “law” to be used. These “unstated” provisions were implemented with no Notice given to anyone in a position to object.
This Gross Breach of Trust and the profound violation of The Rule of Law that is involved must be addressed.
Humboldt has not had a lawful BOS, Recorder, Tax Collector, Assessor, or Sheriff since December 1992 and all actions undertaken since then are in doubt.
The secretive change from being personally Bonded to an “Umbrella Insurance Policy” that does not include Dishonesty in its coverage, and occupation of the positions are an act of purposeful, criminal fraud against the people of Humboldt. I found this to be fact when I filed YOUR so-called Commercial MM Land Use Ordinance litigation March 25, 2016. YOUR Risk Management Dept., didn’t even have the wherewithal to notify the insurance carrier. Why? Because YOUR 18 or so Counsel of the foreign British Registry Accreditation, BAR union members told Risk Management not to.
This secret “policy” of shedding the Bond requirement is the single most virulent source of the criminality that has infested government services corporations Statewide, created the Matrix of Corporate Feudalism, and reduced governance to the level of modern day Robber Barons.
We, the people, have the right, the responsibility, and the power to require an end to this circumstance—-alleged Sheriff, Supervisors, Recorder, Tax Collector, Assessor, pretend Grand Jury and Judicial whores be damned.
By Operation of Law, the offices all stand vacant. The elected and appointed officials are “civilly” dead, murdered by their own hands 26 years ago. The Wrongdoers were adequately informed of this circumstance September 11, 2015 (See Attached), and have done nothing. It is time for intervention or there shall be no Rule of Law and no safety for anyone anywhere.
Logic dictates that you cannot prove somebody violated an Ordinance/Code if you cannot prove that the Ordinance/Code apply in the first place.
Carlotta, Republic California State
Who has the authority to liquidate corporations acting as criminal syndicates?
We, the People on the land Republic California State
Post Office Box 5692 Eureka, California
Certified Mail 7012 2210 0001 7889 2240
NOTICE OF FRAUD
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL. APPLICATIONS TO ALL SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE.
Under penalty of law, Secretary of State’s Office and/or the County Clerk and Records Office is to forward to all listed below.
WARNING: Seeking legal advice from an attorney is self-admission that you are incompetent/not qualified for the office that you occupy.1 Your Constitutions are your contract with the People. You have no excuse for ignorance of your contract.2
A recent investigation has revealed that none of you are qualified for the position/office that you occupy. The California Constitution and the General Law3 require each one of you to have an Official Bond filed with Your Oaths of Office. The purpose of the Official Bond is to bind the elected, appointed, or hired official to her/his Oath of Office. Not one of Humboldt County Records Office File Clerks has such Official Bond on file for any one of you4 nor does the office of Secretary of State. Some have no Oath of Office on file either. Therefore, you are all occupying a vacant office, fraudulently and feloniously embezzling from the Public Treasury. Every action you have made/are making is null and void.
Soon the people of California, the people of Humboldt, will become aware of this. It may be far better to publicly appear and defend or resign forthwith. Failure to deny is to admit.
1 The Constitution is the mandate of a sovereign people to its servants and representatives which no one of them has a right to ignore or disregard. John F. Jelke Co. v. Emery, 193 Wis. 311, 214 N.W. 389, 53 A.L.R. 463.
2 “In our system of government a written Constitution is the highest expression of law.” Re Denny, 158 Ind. 104 59 N.E. 359, 51 L.R.A. 722.
3 California Law/Government Code, Title I, Division 4, Chapter 3 Official Bonds, Section 1450 Unless otherwise provided, every official bond shall be filed in the proper office within the time prescribed for filing the oath.
4 A person to fill a term of office is not permitted to assume the duties of the office until he files a bond and oath of office, which must be done before the commencement of the term, or the office shall be deemed vacant.
People v. Quimby, 152 Colo. 231, 381 P.2d 275 (1963).
We, the People for Humboldt
California Department of Transportation Director Malcolm Dougherty [Certified Mail #7012 2210 0001 7889 2165] Failed to deny April 24, 2015.
Humboldt County Sheriff and Coroner Michael Downey Humboldt County Supervisor Virginia Bass
Humboldt County Supervisor Rex Bohn
Humboldt County Supervisor Estelle Fennell
Humboldt County Supervisor Mark Lovelace Humboldt County Supervisor Ryan Sundberg
Former County Supervisor Cliff Clendendon
Humboldt County Agriculture Commissioner Jeff Dolf Humboldt County Commissioner Alan Bongio Humboldt County Commissioner Robert Morris Humboldt County Commissioner Noah Levy Humboldt County Commissioner Kevin McKenny Humboldt County Commissioner Lee Ulansey Humboldt County Commissioner Ben Shephard Humboldt County Commissioner David Edmonds Humboldt County Court File Clerk Elizabeth Smith Humboldt County Court File Clerk John DOE Humboldt County Records File Clerk Margaret Morris Humboldt County Clerk Kelly Sanders
Former County Clerk Carolyn Crnich (counted the People’s Wage Initiative and unlawful Measure Z Tax ballots) Humboldt County Clerk of the Court Keri L. Keenan
Humboldt County Treasurer-Tax Collector John Bartholomew
Humboldt County Criminal District Attorney Margaret Fleming
Former County Criminal District Attorney Paul Gallegos Eureka City Council Marion Brady
Eureka City Council Linda Atkins
Eureka City Council Melinda Ciarabellini
Eureka City Council Mayor Frank J. Jager Former City Council member Mike Newman Former City Council member Lance Madsen Eureka Finance Director Wendy Howard Former Finance Director Paul Rodriguez Eureka City Manager Greg Sparks
Former City Manager Tyson
Eureka City Clerk Pamela Powell
Eureka City Attorney Cynthia Day-Wilson
Humboldt County Judge Dale A. Reinholtsen
Humboldt County Presiding Judge Joyce D. Hinrichs
Sacramento BAR member Cynthia J. Larsen
Sacramento BAR member Cameron L. Desmond (City of Eureka v the People BONDage April 8, 2013).
The United States Supreme Court held in Carter v. Carter Coal Company, 296 U.S. 238, 297: “And the Constitution itself is in every real sense a law – the lawmakers being people themselves, in whom under our system all political power and sovereignty primarily resides, and through whom such power and sovereignty primarily speaks. It is by that law, and not otherwise, that the legislative, executive, and judicial agencies which it created exercise such political authority as they have been permitted to possess. The Constitution speaks for itself in terms so plain that to misunderstand their import is not rationally possible. ‘We the People of the United States’ it says, ‘do ordain and establish this Constitution.’ Ordain and establish! These are definite words of enactment, and without more would stamp what follows with the dignity and character of law. The framers of the Constitution, however, were not content to let the matter rest here, but provided explicitly – ‘This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof, . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land.’ (Const. art. 6, cl. 2). The supremacy of the Constitution as law is thus declared without qualification. That supremacy is absolute; the supremacy of a statute enacted by Congress is not absolute but conditioned upon its being made in pursuance of the Constitution. And a judicial tribunal, clothed by that instrument with complete judicial power; and therefore, by the very nature of the power, required to ascertain and apply the law to the fact in every case or proceeding properly brought for adjudication, must apply the supreme law and reject the inferior statute whenever the two conflict.”
Departments derive authority from constitution. By the constitution of the state the government is divided into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. The constitution is the paramount law. Each department derives its authority from that source. Colorado State Bd. Of Med. Examrs. v. District Court (1958).
As sovereignty resides in individuals. The individual, and not the state, is the source and basis of our social compact and that sovereignty now resides and always has resided in the individual.
Colorado Anti-Discrimination Comm’s v. Case (1962).
Right to comment on courts and judges. The growth of constitutional liberty has abolished arbitrary power of courts to inflict punishment and penalties upon persons commenting upon courts and judges or upon the character thereof, through contempt proceedings, and the right to make any such comment upon courts and judges in any respect, and as fully and freely as may be desired, is a right of every person, and is a right reserved to the people without any express reservation, as provided in this section.
People ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. News-Times Publishing Co., 35 Colo. (1906), appeal dismissed, 205 U.S. 454, 27 S.Ct. (1907).
We, the People for California
September 11, 2015
James Decker Linda Cassara
Holder of the office of “the people” Holder of the office of “the people”