offit_MonkeyvirusDr. Paul Offit is a pediatrician who co-invented/patented a rotavirus vaccine (trade name RotaTeq), and once stated in interview that a child can be administered 100,000 vaccines safely at once (later revised to 10,000). A professor of Pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania, he is the darling of the lamestream media and a widely cited self-appointed ‘vaccine safety expert,’ despite the glaring conflict of interest implied by such a designation.

Unfortunately for Dr. Offit (not so affectionately named Dr. Profit), a 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar grossing patent on the RotaTeq vaccine contains a live simian retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years with a virus that causes great harm. Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they cannot be removed.

Moreover, a 2014 study published in Advances in Virology found Dr. Offit’s vaccine contains “a baboon endogenous virus strain M7… likely due to the monkey cell line in which RotaTeq was produced from.”

In order to grasp the dire significance of these findings, you might want to familiarize yourself with the history of adventitious viruses in so-called attenuated or live vaccines.

These contain the actual disease vector they are supposed to prevent. While considered “weakened,” their process of manufacture often make them more adaptable to the host within which they are injected. Many rounds of passage through human and animal cells often makes these vaccines far more dangerous than the natural ‘wild-type’ infections that we encounter naturally. You only have to look to oral polio vaccine to understand the dangers of the vaccine model. In 2011, the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics published a study revealing that vaccine strain polio is twice as lethal as wild-type, and has been identified to cause over 47,000 cases of polio-associated paralysis in 2011 alone.

The theory is that by infecting healthy bodies with them you generate an immune response – validated by elevated antibody titers, regardless of their affinity to the pathogen – that results (in theory) in increased protection. Regardless of the justification for using monkey cells for vaccine production, monkey retroviruses contaminate the vaccines nonetheless. By infecting healthy infants with these viruses you are making them sick. Retroviruses use reverse transcriptase – a viral enzyme – to insert pathogenic genetic information into healthy cells, effectively converting them into virus-manufacturing factories. And no matter what your medical philosophy is, monkey viruses have no place in a human body.

For context, consider the deleterious role of a previous monkey virus – simian virus 40 (SV40) – in the polio vaccination campaigns. This ‘hidden’ cancer-causing virus infected millions of unsuspecting polio vaccine recipients during the initial polio eradication campaigns. Not only is it cancer-causing, but it is passed down transgenerationally. Merck’s senior vaccine scientist confessed in interview as to the damage these SV-40 contaminated vaccines did to millions of unsuspecting victims, including causing cancer. These vaccines did untold damage to the following infected generations, leaving a legacy of untold pain and suffering in millions of offspring whose parents unwittingly succumbed to one of the most dangerous biological experiments in human history.

Retroviruses are just as serious. HIV for instance, is a retrovirus whose phylogenetic lineage also comes from a monkey virus: simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Offit’s RotaTeq vaccine should be pulled from the market, considering it contains live viruses that are capable of infecting the bodies of those within which they are injected. For information on the exploding epidemic caused by hidden viruses in vaccines, read Judy Mikovits’ incredible new book Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth About Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Autism and Other Diseases. It’s a must read!

The significance of these findings cannot be underestimated. Childhood infections are a natural rite of passage for the developing immune system. In developed nations, where nutrition, hygiene and sanitation are up to par, infection from childhood pathogens normally proceed without morbidity or mortality – lest the infant/child is already immuno-compromised. In fact, rotavirus challenges result in lasting immunity and provide the justification ultimately for the vaccinology model, which draws from the normal (arguably millions of years old ) experience of overcoming infection, constructing a model of vaccine-induced immunity upon this natural fact.

Paul Offit, the patent holder of the RotaTeq vaccine is morally obligated to call for an immediate halt of the use of his vaccine in infants and children. Failing to do so makes him culpable in the harm of millions of children that he personally profits from infecting with retroviruses.

Enough is enough. The facts are clearly available for anyone with an ‘evidence-based’ bent to ascertain.

The credibility of the entire vaccination schedule is on the line.

This article first appeared at GreenMedInfo.



redwoods_12Matrix – a false and strong consensus, which is a lie. But not just any old silly consensus –-a very deep shared picture of reality. It has all the earmarks of being true. So many persons accept it. So many believe it’s right. So many persons believe that, if it were wrong, if it were an illusion, their view of the world would shatter like cheap glass. So they retreat, they turn their backs. They settle into accepting the Matrix picture in the transparent bubble.

Persons are consciously or unconsciously fixated on boundaries and systems. They are hoping for whatever can be delivered through the @System@ via the medisin, religion, legal, and political Gods.

The fixation is a form of mind control.

Once we overstand that everything is an illusion, we’re home free.

“When great changes occur in history. When great principles are involved, as a rule the majority are wrong.” Eugene V. Debs

Conventional methods of compelling performance from this queen aren’t effective.


By Dave Lindorff

You might not know it from watching TV news, but FBI statistics show that crime in America—including violent crime—has been trending steadily downward for years, falling 19% between 1987 and 2011. The job of being a police officer has become safer too, as the number of police killed by gunfire plunged to 33 last year, down 50% from 2012, to its lowest level since, wait for it . . . 1887, a time when the population was 75% lower than it is today.

So why are we seeing an ever-increasing militarization of policing across the land?

Given the good news on crime, what are we to make of a report by the Justice Policy Institute, a not-for-profit justice reform group, showing that State/Local spending on police has soared from $40 billion in 1982 to more than $100 billion in 2012. Adding in federal spending on code enforcement, including the FBI, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the Drug Enforcement Agency and much of the Homeland Security Department ‘budget,’ as well as federal grants to State/Local code enforcement, more than doubles that total. A lot of that is simply to; Income & benefits. The Federal Bureau of Justice statistics reports that the ranks of State {and} Local code enforcement personnel alone, swelled from 603,000 to 794,000 between 1992 and 2010. That’s about two-thirds as many men and women as the entire active-duty US military.

What these statistics make clear is that Policy Policing in America is ramping up even as the crime rate is falling.

To the advocates of militarized policing, this just proves that more and better armed badge-wearers are the answer to keeping the peace. But former corrections officer Ted Kirkpatrick, like many experts in the field, warns against jumping to this conclusion: “Police will, of course say crime is down, because of them,” he tells WhoWhatWhy, “but they have a vested interest in saying that.”

Kirkpatrick has the credentials and training to look beyond statistics and simplistic answers to the underlying social forces at work here. In addition to his years of Peace Officer experience, he is a homicide expert in the Department of Clinical Sociology at the University of New Hampshire, and Co-Director of the university’s Justiceworks program, a think-tank specializing in law and justice issues.

“When something goes sour, like an increase in crime,” Kirkpatrick says, “everyone looks for a way to explain why. Yet when things go well, like this long-term fall in the crime rate, nobody bothers to look at why.”

Surprising Reasons for Drop in Crime Rate

Militarized “pro-active” policing may have had some effect on the drop in crimes in America. But Kirkpatrick says, “I don’t think it’s the big thing.” Crime is down even in many cities where police forces have been cut for budget reasons, and experts agree that the decline in crime began before the militarization of policing really started to take off.

Other factors likely play a bigger role. One is increased immigration since, contrary to common belief, communities with greater numbers of immigrant families show the biggest drops in crime thanks to those families’ “stronger social fabric.” Another factor is an aging population—older people commit fewer violent crimes.

So what’s behind the push to put more police on our streets, with ever more impressive military equipment, while training them to behave like occupying troops in Iraq or Afghanistan?

One might assume that the militarization of U.S. Inc.’s Enforcement began after the national trauma of Nine One One. But, in fact, its roots go back decades earlier, when media stories in the 1970s created the impression that America was awash in illegal drugs.

An aroused Congress passed a “no-knock” ‘Law’ in 1970. “The Law” said: that it allowed police to conduct drug searches and arrests by entering homes without first presenting a warrant. President Nixon’s declaration of his War on Drugs a year later led to an exponential increase in warrant-less (?) {drug} searches, with an inevitable emphasis on military-style policing.

SWAT team actions soared from hundreds annually in the 1970s to thousands a year in the ‘80s to 40,000 a year by 2005, according to a report by the libertarian CATO institute. The author of that report, and academic experts studying the issue, now estimate there may have been as many as 70,000-80,000 such raids in 2013 alone. Hard figures are not available: the Justice Department does not keep records on SWAT-team usage.

On top of the increase triggered by Nixon’s War on Drugs, Commander-In-Chief of U.S. Inc’s armed forces -George W. Bush’s War on Terror in the aftermath of Nine One One, gave a dramatic boost to the militarization of U.S. Inc’s Police forces.

In these days “officer safety” is given primacy over “protect and serve.” A case in point: a South Carolina Sheriff’s Deputy in February shot and seriously injured a 70-year-old man at a traffic stop when the man tried to retrieve his cane from the back of his pick-up truck. The Sheriff’s Department said the Deputy acted “appropriately,” as he had “a legitimate fear” that the cane might have been a long rifle.

In another recent example, New York City police shot and injured an unarmed man who was acting “erratically” in Times Square. The officers were exonerated, while the man they shot was charged with causing injury to several bystanders—who were hit by the Policy Police’s stray bullets.

“I’m all for police officers not getting hurt on the job,” says Lawyers Guild’s Keller, “but if you make that your first concern, then it’s problematic, because you allow the use of deadly or excessive force in practically every situation between military clad persons and any one or more of the people, and you end up with the people getting hurt.”

In fact, while being a policy officer has been getting less dangerous, killings committed by policies have been rising despite the drop in police who are killed.

The numbers are eye opening. The Justice Department, which keeps all kinds of statistics on violent crime, does not tally up individuals killed annually by Policy Police. But by combing public news reports and other sources, the Justice Policy Institute has estimated that police in America killed 587 people in 2012 alone. Over the course of a decade, they’ve tallied more than 5,000 people in America during that period—far more than the number of people who lost their lives in acts officially classified as terrorism in roughly the same span.

The many instances of deadly police violence captured on video give a visceral reality to these statistics. They show police beating and sometimes needlessly shooting the people—even those with their hands up or armed only with a knife or stick while standing too far from the police to pose a threat.

In some areas, police have responded to these damaging videos by routinely confiscating bystanders’ cell phones and threatening witnesses with arrest, even though federal courts have consistently held that people have a right to photograph and videotape persons/officers engaged in police actions.

The National Police Accountability Project’s Keller suggests that, along with the public’s acceptance of military-style policing, the killing of innocent people has become more acceptable too. Police are rarely punished for killing people—even those who were unarmed or already restrained—because in most communities, police shootings are investigated by the police themselves, or by a closely-allied District A. Indeed, about 95 percent of police shootings end up being ruled “justified,” a statistic that hasn’t changed as the body count has risen.

“I think when non-targeted individuals are killed in a raid, or while traveling and shot in the course of a routine “traffic” stop, it’s seen as a kind of ‘collateral damage,’” Keller says, “instead of as some tragic or criminal use of excessive force by police.”

Public indifference to deaths in police actions highlights a dis-connect: The public perceives rampant crime while the actual crime report suggests nothing of the sort.

This fundamental misapprehension seems to be fueling the continuing political push for more police and tougher policing. While the militarization of Enforcement has little or no relation to the falling crime rate, there is reason to fear that it is eroding our constitutionally protected rights under the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights.

“I’m not sure that spending money on more police, in Kevlar suits, and in things like armored vehicles is the most efficient thing to do,” says UNH’s Kirkpatrick. “It might be better to spend it on Big Brother/Big Sister-type programs, and other kinds of services for younger generations. The trouble is, we generally implement Public Policy based on sentiment, not logic or statistics, and thanks to the 24-hour news cycle and its really quite dramatic reports on crimes, the average Joe or Jane thinks that things have gone nuts.”

Dave Lindorff is an award-winning investigative reporter and author of the blog, This Can’t Be Happening. A regular columnist for CounterPunch, he also writes frequently for Extra! and Salon, as well as for Businessweek, The Nation and Treasury & Risk Magazine.


~for William Holmes–we miss you, Bill.

Although language can always be analyzed as a commodity, its salience as a resource with exchange value has increased with the growing importance of language in the globalized new economy under the politickal economic conditions of late Corporate Capitalism.

Repetitive Word Religion                                                                                            (Boring Crony Corporate Government $lave-$peak)

Does anyone else sometimes count the words that have no value in any new, new, newspaper? Example: The North Coast Journals’ OFFICER INVOLVED –Inside EPD’s protocol, by Thadeus Greenson. In this somewhat brief dis-information article, the words Policy Police is repeated ten times. Protocol Practice seven times. Policy police, and protocol practice words, used in connection with killing one of We the people, doesn’t fit and, have no place in the 21st century.

Iff the Police Chief doesn’t know what to do, iff the Mayor doesn’t know what to do, it is of certain Not on the District A’s job description. The weak purveyors of nonsense fall further down the abyss, and they want to drag you and me down there with them.We The People Pic

I have two words – Due Process. And four more – common law Grand Jury.

Did this {military-trained} officer not take an oath to the Constitution and republic California state Constitution? Hmmmm?   It’s either for-profit Corporate Commerce (policy police, protocol practice), or it’s the law of the land. It can’t be both.

Change the Definition Religion

What is the value of the word Deputy as compared to the two words Under $heriff? (Supe’s Agenda item July 15, 2014).   Downey was an “Under Sheriff” according to Thadeus Greenson of the NCJ.   Faction or Fiction? How can that be iff we were just impregnated with the words “Under Sheriff” BULLoney two months ago?

Regulate it First, Learn About it Never

Looks like Fiction added another ‘activated’ committee –a Critical Incident Response Team –beecause –the boys have no boulders. Face it. As the fit hits the shan Sheriff D bows down and bends over to THE State(?), the National Guard and the FBI. How comforting is that? Where does Downey’s people-delegated authority to unlawfully call in the NATIONAL Guard come from? What rule, regulation, or code permits him to take such action?   Does his job description not include Posse Comitatus? Does he not know how to train the villagers to protect us from foreign or domestic enemies?

Policy Police Chief Mills “assigned the D.A’s Office a co-lead designation.” Beecause –no boulders, so he assumes a position without evidence for his claim. Mills said, “The D.A.’s Office will ultimately make the determination of whether officers broke the law.”

Really? Truly? Factually?

Well, no, no and no. For one, the D.A.’s Office can’t think, speak, or write and wouldn’t recognize law if it could. The decision is for Thomas McCain’s family to make.

Drew J. Tracy, is a former cop (C.O.P –is originally an acronym for citizens on patrol), and (drum roll) Prez. of Fiction’s newest committee, the Critical Incident Review Team. Tracy “suggests a policy requiring (assKing) a local District A. to present every officer-involved fatality to a criminal Grand Jury, to engender confidence in the entire process.”

Where to start with that line of sh!te.

FIRST: All covert ops are aimed at constructing realities. Stage plays. Virtual environments. And all covert ops are aimed at triggering emotions and images in the target audience, in order to enlist their faith and belief in the illusion. Second, a Grand Jury IS a criminal Grand Jury –duh. We have not had a de jure Grand Jury since 1956.

Purveyor of nonsense Tracy rambles on . . . “Sending every law enforcement shooting to a . . .” Stop! Law, law, law, enforcement??  Like military intelligence and jumbo shrimp, “law enforcement” is an oxymoron. Iff anything, badged revenue generators are Code Enforcers, Policy Police . . . Corporate profit protectors.

Iff any elected poly ticks war against the Constitution it’s called treason. This queen figures that Fiction has three choices: pack and get out of Humboldt, join the X-Mayor of New Orleans who is on his third year of twenty-seven in orange pajamas, or do that little dance that’s done at the end of a Grand Jury’s common law rope.

The World’s biggest problem is that the people believe they are powerless.

“For those who grew up tall and proud                                                                               In the shadow of the mushroom cloud                                                                   Convinced our voices can’t be heard                                                                               We just want to scream it louder, and louder, and louder.”  Queen

“When love is on the field, fear must retreat.” Harold Klemp, Truth Has No Secrets.

Like a Buddha said, the problem is you think you have time.

May peace prevail on Earth.                                                       Saturday 9-27-14                                                                                                                Wage Initiative Café                                                                                                              Eureka, California


~since this queen deals with Corporatism’s purveyors-of-nonsense in my own backyard, I’m quite experienced at it. So this is nothing personal, just business.

Since sovereigns are unlawfully forbidden from recording into the Public upstairs in the Recorder’s Office . . .

“ON and for the Record to JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, Humboldt Inc’s Treasurer and Tax Collector: The ALL CAPS NAME on Your offer to contract “Property Tax Bill” is Not me. The only thing happening on planet Earth is contract. How many years have I asked You JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, to provide evidence for your claim? i.e., My signature on a contract agreeing to pay a perpetual Tax on {personal} property to a Public Corporation that supports war on nature. It’s like buying a pair of shoes and paying a yearly Tax on them to some imagined power. In other words i, ME, My self, never granted authority to You JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, to use a NAME that phonetically sounds like mine, in Commerce. As well, it’s Mail Fraud to use the united States Post Office to threaten, harass, and intimidate any one of the people to bow-down-bend-over Compliance –for a non-existent contract!!! File/Recording False Documents carries a hefty penalty John.

You’re either a Statist or you’re not. There is no between.

I want to thank Rick Brennan of Eureka for his excellent ‘Letter to the Editor,’ in September 18th’s North Coast Journal, regarding the Supe’s continued raiding of the Public Treasury. The beginning is near. The sleeple are about to connect the last dot of the Corporate U.S. Democratic Matrix bubble. The “transparent” bubble of fraud, deceit and illusion, that anyone with seven or more brain cells can clearly see –when they look. Let me say here that i have many good Public Servants –not of the elected type. Maybe one.

But the blame is on ‘we the people’s’ inaction. Evil exists because our images are distorted. The ancient Beast rising again is not here for us to change it. The ancient Beast is here to ignite change in we the people. Nevertheless, i’ll give it another hint: How many of you five impersonators of Public Servants are willing to take an oath to the Constitution for the united States of America? IFF you foolishly beLIEve that the certified copies i have of your “Affirmed” oaths hold any substance, think again. Each one of you “Affirmed” an oath (Jesus called this an Oath of the head), to a U.S. Constitution. Can anyone of you five Supervisors produce evidence, a document that is labeled U.S Constitution?   Otherwise, voting is like a dog returning to its own vomit. You five believe, think, talk, and act in out-dated, in-the-crypt, slave-speak, that has no place in the twenty-first century. No thing on your State-generated Agenda has anything to do with law –the law of the land. Hence, you persons carry-on in your Matrix bubble of illusion reality –ordinances, codes, rules and regulations delivered by THE State. I don’t know who or what you persons believe the state to be. But you’re looking at it whenever you see any one or more of we the people. That we are not equal is a primitive belief of primitive man.

As well, please bring forth a bona fide claim that we the people Ever delegated authority to you five to extort our rights and wealth via misconveyance of language.  “Deputy” to UNDER >>>a no-value word) Sheriff has brought us here in Humboldt – the National Guard, the FEDERAL Bureau of Investigation, a military-trained SWAT team, and drones.

Deputy, unlawfully labeled Under Sheriff, Billy Honsel and used-to-be Supe., Jimmy Smith, babble-on about Measure Z on the radio. A Commercial, paid for by we the people, to tax ourselves!!! Can you say warring against the Constitution?

Whoever expects Me to abide by man-made rules, you must step-up to the Republic also.

Perhaps some of the people wonder about the $4-million-over the so-called “Budget” amount (mentioned in Rick Brennan’s letter) being spent on what’s labeled “Mental Health.” “Mental Health” has no foundation in science, just collusion $ecrecy.  Can you say hoax?

AntiChrist&Christ“1 in 6 American Children Has A Developmental Disability.” ONE in SIX!!! Did we the people Ever delegate, to a Satanic genocide-supporting External Authority, permission to express our power regarding the health of our earthly bodies? Are any one of you COME GET YOUR FLU SHOT Rulers licensed in the medical profession? “I have not the least doubt in my mind that vaccination is a filthy process that is harmful in the end.” Gandhi. Can you say vaccine-autism fraud?

Putting God Move Over (GMO) on a ballot, at the people’s expense of course, is a weak $ideway$ move. Silently, billions of bees are dying off and our entire food chain is in danger. People gathered signatures about toxic Frankenfood . . . republic California state spoke. What do you five Supes. not understand about the word No? The N or the O?

To any fool who beLIEves that “LEGALIZING” nature has any lawful basis in the real world . . . I have some condos on Jupiter for sale.

Every one of humankind wants to be free to think and act. The only thing that’s ever stopped them is ancient political @Systems@. Politics – poly=many, ticks=blood suckers.

The world’s biggest problem is that people believe they are powerless.

Humanity’s awakening is assured, inevitable, and unavoidable.

This document originated from a Humboldter’s jurisdiction, outside of the Matrix.  Do not trespass.

May peace prevail on Earth.”

Forest queen


Go to, then Government, then Finance & Records, then Auditor, then Quick Links -choose Annual Financial Reports. Fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 is 90 pages and was completed March 2014. Insurance is on the last 11 pages. CalPers invests in Monsanto. CalPers is the world’s second largest investment corporation. Second to U.S. Inc.  CalPers Global Governance –

“We (Gallina of Roseville) conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America AND the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.”  Note -–-keep in mind that when you see U.S., or United States without the word America . . . we’re talking Corporation, not landmass.

Page 3 references many times that the “. . . statements are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.”

Page 4 tells us ten times, that basic financial statements are used. Translation: NO ONE, not the people, not the Grand Jury, not even the auditors see ALL of Humboldt County’s records and books. H.S., C.R., and all school districts are conveniently not included . . . not to worry . . . . . slave-speak anesthetizes the criminals and thieves. They beLIEve their behinds to be covered.

Page 9: Total government funds Fund Balance increased by $2,964,951 in comparison with the prior year. The major governmental funds had changes in fund balances as follows: General Fund increased $5,327,427, Roads Fund increased $1,009,461 and Headwaters Mitigation Fund decreased $1,219,877. None of the current General Fund balance is currently assigned.

Page 15: Total net position – $451,637,033. Last year’s was $452,072,414.

Page 32: The Headwaters Mitigation Fund is used to reimburse the County for the loss of property and timber tax revenues subsequent to the Headwaters Forest purchase (?) by State and Federal agencies.

Question; what percentage of Humboldt’s terra firma does State and Federal agencies have tentacles on?   Property tax paid?  Ever?

Reimburse. This is like ‘Revenue Recovery’ in Oz on the first floor of the Administration Bldg. To ‘re-cover’ or ‘re-imburse’ something, generally means that you had something, lost it, and recovered it. IFF you did not have it in the first place, how can you be re-imbursed for it? We’re talking priceless redwoods, fawn, flora and fish from another time here, the Headwaters Forest. Never mind that U.S. INC. is restricted by the Constitution for the united States of America in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 investing Congress with the power of exclusive legislation in a District not exceeding ten miles square on the east coast. . . and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings.

“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.” James Madison

U.N.’s AGENDA 21

Genocide, labeled Sustainable Development

The Trader’s September 9th issue has an article on page 29 titled “Forestry Stewardship Council Audit Determines Fate of Mattole Redwood Forests.”  Really?  Is this Council elected? Did we the people grant them authority to make ANY ‘Legal’ determination for us? Or the land and forests that are being destroyed every day in Humboldt? Are some people giving away their power (Yikes!) when they attend these meetings by perceiving Fiction to be fact? Does any external authority possess rights that you and i don’t?

Think bigger. That we are not equal is primitive thinking of primitive man.

Does Banana Republic clothing company that transformed into Humboldt Lumber Company really own the land? I mean, did they buy it with gold or silver, or worthless privately printed foreign I.O.U’s, labeled Federal Reserve Notes? How was title transferred? By a ‘color of law’ deed title? Is Humboldt Lumber Company aiding and abetting the U.N. enemy?

Is this what our founders and hundreds of thousands of men lived, fought, and died for? So that we would turn our back on the greatest document ever written? Is the U.N. not a foreign jurisdiction? i.e., foreign to the law of the land. The sky is not falling, but our rights are being @systematically@ eroded. Attending bogus meetings of regional unelected bodies pushing their global Agenda down our throats is an act in futility. This is a fraudulent scheme with plans underway for a giant land grab, not an environmental issue, that is a ruse. It’s about controlling our society and our lives, curtailing our freedoms, and altering our fundamental right to own property. Why are unelected regional agencies dictating how and where we will live in the future?

Our elected Public Servants involved in this are violating Article I Section 10 of the Constitution -“No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance or Federation . . .with a foreign power.” ICLEI (the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) is responsible for injecting international climate, land use and other policies (NOT law) into local Corporations, labeled Government.

Regionalism is taking over and the result will be loss of local control for the people. When you see the words ‘Policy,” “Custom,” “Practice,” know that the Constitution is being trampled on in an effort to destroy private rights.

Realize that the better things don’t really come out of committees, present-day managing, or any other arrangement that heads off the capability, sight, and own activity of individuals. If Americans abdicate our freedom to an international order, we will never get it back.


Screen Shot 2014-09-13 at 5.32.41 PMThe crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government. “They were convicted of treason” Synonyms: treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness.

It has already been done on paper. Now it has to be sold to the people.

Throughout history “Order Takers” have committed the worst atrocities on humankind. I’m convinced that the STATE, CA. INC., prepares a weekly agenda, makes 58 copies and sends it to the 58 counties in California. Enter the five county Order Takers, labeled Supervisors, on Tuesdays to vote ‘yes’ on all STATE Agenda items –except for the petitions or initiatives brought forward by the people. Those, at the expense of the people, will be tabled for as long as possible, then placed on a ballot –the Wage Initiative, and God Move Over (GMO).

Can you say Treason?

The STATE orchestrated attack – November 7, 2011 at 3:00 a.m., terrorists, labeled Police, in military garb viciously attacked sleeping Occupiers in Eureka, Oakland, and Los Angeles –sending many to hospitals. Three months before this, the City Managers of these same cities unlawfully fired the Police Chiefs. Unlawfully because the hiring and firing of Police Chiefs is on the elected Mayor’s job description. Since then, the words on paper shifted this duty to unelected City Managers. Eureka has scrambled three City Managers since then. Who gave the order for the 3:00 a.m. attack? The District A’s -NOT on their job description. Just in case any of the sleeple were paying attention, other California city’s Order Takers slid down the same dark path and fired their Police Chiefs – spread out the evidence.

Can you say Treason?

Two months ago in July, the County Order Takers changed the title of the Sheriff’s Deputies to “Under Sheriff.” Does anyone remember delegating authority to the Supes. to change/define our words? Change our ability to communicate? Sell it to the people. Thursday, September 11th, KWPT’s radio waves repeatedly broadcast a PR blurb (at we the people’s expense of course), spoken by unelected “Under Sheriff” Billy Honsel, and used-to-be Supe. Jimmy Smith. What is NOT said about Measure Z is the main point – TAX. These two dupes dance all around, whining and whimpering about their favorite misconveyance of language word, Budget. The word ‘Budget’ does not show the standing value of a Corporation. Humboldt’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for 2012 shows a value of over $508 mil. Gotta be several more million today. These Followers of Fiction in the Matrix bubble of dishonesty, deceit, and fraud, are attempting to shove the STATE’s Agenda down our throats. Measure Z = TAX. Long ago tea was dumped in the Boston harbor due to an attempt to tax the colonists 2%. We are now paying over 50% of our income in taxes. I don’t care what it’s labeled –permits, fees, property tax, license, registration – it’s TAX.   What really gets me about this Measure Z Tax, is the arrogance, and the 24/7 strive for power to gain control. I MEAN, the Order Takers follow along like dunces being led to the volcano and pushed in. Tax the people, AND THEN, add salt to the gapping wound, broadcast their TAX the people into starvation on the radio!!!

Can you say Treason?

Also on Thursday, September 11th, i kept hearing these threatening words on Humboldt’s radio waves – F.B.I., National Guard, Swat Team, and Drones. Connect the Matrix bubble dots . . . the misconveyance of language to extort the rights and wealth of the people by unlawfully and unconstitutionally distorting faction communication between the very people who put food on the Order Taker’s table. I.E., – Deputy to “Under Sheriff.” Whenever, and ALWAYS, when the devil’s deed doers change our words that are part and parcel to inter-standing true communication, you can bet your doll hairs that it’s all about power via extortion –Measure Z. The so-called Sheriff Downey welcomed with open arms domestic enemies – U.S. INC’s FBI and the National Guard. The National Guard’s job description is just what it says – guard the country, not attack the people within the states.

Can you say Treason?

Define “Under Sheriff” – I’m guessing that these Order Taker’s job description changed to accompany no liability for Sheriff D. Then, it will appear that those of us here in Humboldt are too weak and dumbed-down to save, protect, and defend ourselves when the fit hits the shan. So, unlawfully call in the National Guard, FBI and Downey’s Swat Team. Get used to it folks, these negative vibration words imply violence and crime, and will be repeated, and repeated, and repeated, and repeated. The boring political (poly=many, ticks=blood suckers) repitious dog and pony shows are aimed at getting us used to hearing certain key words, thus accepting the fraud, deceit, and illusion.

Can you say Treason?

This doesn’t take a rocket surgeon. Any one of us with seven or more brain cells can see the democratic Corporation’s out-dated, in-the-crypt, slave-speak policies that continues on automatic replay, has no place in the 21st century. Crony “Order Takers” – IQ –not over 104.

We the people are reaching for the circle, and the 1% Order Takers will not let go of the pyramid ~that external authority bullshit. Has it ever occurred to you that as the holocaust was happening, that the people out-numbered the genocide Order Takers by hundreds of thousands? WHY didn’t the people act?

The power is outside the Matrix. Always has been, always will be. Fact and Fiction can’t meet. The power remains with the people. We delegate authority to those we elect to express our power. Never offer your power to another, since it is your only access to spirit.   “Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.” Kissinger.

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” Warburg.

The Treason is in the ratification and implementation of these edicts, without the consent of the governed, to further the aims of the international U.N. community against America.

We’re not going to vote ourselves out of this.

“But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand. So thou, O son of man, I have sent thee a watchman, therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me. When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but his blood will I require at thine hand. Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.”   Ezekiel 33:6-9

“If you shut up truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”   Emilel Zola (1840-1902).

Heads-Up Humboldt


Christopher Monkton                                                                                                   Former advisor to U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

The numbers are in and the verdict is that there has been no global warming for 17 years and 11 months, according to satellite data.

Satellite data shows there has been no warming trend from October of 1996 to August of 2014 — 215 months. To put this in perspective, those who graduated from high school this year have not lived through any global warming in their lifetimes.

The United Nations Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) first predicted in 1990 that global temperatures would rise at a rate of 2.8 degrees Celsius per century. But the temperature rise since the IPCC’s prediction has only been at a rate of 1.4 degrees Celsius per century.

Though more than two dozen more or less implausible excuses for this, the climate scientists are appearing nervous in reviewed journals. The possibility that the predicted “Global Warming” is not occurring because the computer models are simply wrong about the sensitivity of temperature to man-made green-house gases can no longer be dismissed.

Meteorologists have been predicting a weak el Niño this fall and winter, which would warm ocean waters.

An el Niño would normally peak during the northern-hemisphere winter. There is too little information to say how much temporary warming it will cause, but a new wave of warm water has emerged in recent days, so one should not yet write off this el Niño as a non-event.

El Niños occur every few years and can cause global temperatures to temporarily spike. Such events caused temperature spikes in 1998, 2007 and 2010. But these temperature spikes are often followed by huge drops in temperatures.

~and the Democratic Matrix devil doers’ dense tone lingers i.e., Global Warming Faked By Corporations, labeled Government, To Fit Climate Change Fictions.


Maybe you’re a libertarian. But an anarchist, no way.

Some day, however, you might be.

On the path to anarchism, there are five stages. And unlike conventional applications of the Kübler-Ross model, the end result is not death or loss, but life and freedom.

5: Denial. To you, anarchism is silly. Untenable and impossible, it should be dismissed. On the other hand, your abstruse ideal of “limited government” should be upheld and relentlessly pursued. You may or may not think the phenomenon of “market failure” is real.

An anarchist friend of yours gives you a copy of Murray Rothbard’s For a New Liberty. Proudly donning your faux-Che “Reagan Revolution” t-shirt, you assert, “I’ve learned everything I need to know from Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman, thank you very much.”

4: Anger. Why are these pesky anarchists undermining the libertarian movement? Just when respectable liberty-minded politicians begin to influence their colleagues, some renegade anarchist sullies the gains. And as soon as libertarianism earns an iota of respect from the general public, anarchists remind everyone just how crazy freedom is.

If confronted by a particularly persistent anarchist, you quote F.A. Hayek, assuming that will shut the anti-Stater up. “Probably nothing has done so much harm to the liberal [libertarian] cause as the wooden insistence of some…on certain rules of thumb, above all the principle of laissez faire.”

Besides, even if private roads were indeed possible, surely the government is necessary to provide for the national defense. The Constitution says so, after all.

3: Bargaining. Alright, alright. Maybe the anarchists make some solid points. You’re willing to concede that. Still, though, we live in a world of reality.

Your hero, Ludwig von Mises, knew this. For that reason, he rejected Statelessness, noting that, “Anarchism misunderstands the real nature of man. It would be practicable only in a world of angels and saints.”

Also, your Statist girlfriend (or boyfriend, wife, husband) just came to terms with your inhuman belief in the institution of private property and is sleeping with you again. You’re in no position to push the envelope. As long as the anarchists leave you alone, you leave them alone.

Upon further insistence from your anarchist friend, you begrudgingly read Rothbard’s For a New Liberty.

2: Depression. After reading the Rothbard, the world around you collapses. You call all your fundamental beliefs into question.

“Could I really be one of them?” you lament. “There’s no hope for me now.”

On the precipice of anarchism, you desperately cling to the last remaining tenet of State power you believe might be legitimate: Justice. Even if the free market could supply adequate amounts of clean air, defense, and police, how would disagreements between private firms be settled?

1: Acceptance. One day, it just all comes together. Everything “clicks,” so to speak. Any lingering cognitive dissonance evaporates and the fog lifts. Reading Hoppe had something to do with it, of course, but it was your ability to toss off the shackles of conventional thought that ultimately led to your complete rejection of the State.

You reach an intellectual apex of sorts. No longer does your conception of society include the retrospectively narrow constraint of the State and its progeny—war, oppression, tyranny, injustice. Individuals need not be circumscribed to be civilized.

You realize that the State is not a virus that can be inoculated by exposure in small doses. It is a cancerous tumor that feeds on those unaware of its true malignance. You conclude that “limited Government” is an oxymoron.

Observing that a disproportionately high number of anarchists wear them, you succumb to an irresistible temptation to buy a bowtie.

Suddenly, you’re an anarchist. You experience it—that awkward moment when you realize the State is superfluous.

And while it’s probably not polite cocktail party conversation, you bring it up anyway. “I’m an anarchist,” you blurt out at every opportunity, if for no other reason than to enjoy the quizzical looks that always ensue.

Then, over a three-and-a-half hour conversation, at least one of your interlocutors becomes intrigued enough to check out that kooky Rothbard character. The five stages begin in yet another individual, and for that, it was all worth it.

Inside every libertarian, there’s an anarchist waiting to be set free. You’re either a Statist or you’re not. There is no in-between.

This article originally appeared in The Washington Times.

Written By                                                                                                                 Joseph S. Diedrich