The Supreme Court has determined: All codes, rules and regulations are for government authorities only, not humans in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process.                                     Rodrigues v Ray Donavan 769 R 2d 1344, 1348 (1985)

These foreign agents have operated in fraud so long, they’ve forgotten about how to serve people. They can take their Codes, Rules, Regulations and Ordinances and shove them up their rectal orifice. I’m not interested in deceptive opposition or justification for ignoring truths.

They have the voracious appetite of gluttonous hogs in slop who will gorge themselves so long as the people are fooled into believing foreign agents have jurisdiction and authority to rape and pillage our families.

In no uncertain terms these whores in the black robes are nothing but the most despicable, lowest forms of character I have ever encountered. They deserve to be stripped of everything they have embezzled. Their victims deserve to be redressed.

The General Court is a failure. The inner works of the General Court is anything but a service to the people. They are puppets of the BAR that serves their master.

With very few exceptions, the Fiction called JUDICIAL BRANCH within STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba, is from top to bottom, a criminal enterprise for profit, extortion, kidnapping, fraud, treason, reckless endangerment of our sons and daughters, and many other high crimes, all under the guise of presumption, martial law, and WAR against the people of this land.

The only way to correct this corruption is to throw them out in the streets and some behind bars. Their estates need to be liquidated and returned to the rightful beneficiaries.

A common law jury would deal very harshly with these thugs. Any action in their foreign “court” is to benefit them at our expense.

Judicial immunity does not exist for Judges who engage in criminal activity or aid and abet in criminal activity. The United States Supreme Court has stated that “if a court is without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.” Elliott v. Piersol. They are not voidable, they are simply void and form no basis for alleging judicial immunity. When a Judge acts as a trespasser of the law or when he does not follow the law, he loses subject matter jurisdiction and all of his orders are void and have no recognizable lawful force or effect. –The City of Eureka v. the People – ya think?

When the “judge” works for STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and the “persecutor” works for STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and the Atturn they’re trying to coerce you to contract with is an officer of the “court” of STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and the alleged plaintiff is STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and you are surrounded by them, you are NOT standing in a constitutional court, period. You are NOT getting a jury of your peers. In a real trial by jury, the “judge” is to sit there and SHUT UP! and not attempt to box jurors in by tampering with them. You are NOT going to get justice. The whore in the black robe knows this! That whore is monetizing you for his/her profit and gain. That whore is a criminal. That whore will threaten you with bodily harm, kidnapping, jail and extortion so as to steal from your estate. The whore will coerce armed gunmen to kill you should you resist arrest. The Policy Police are not acting as peace officers. They’re serving the interests of banking fraud.

The reason that they do nothing according to the constitution is because they are a criminal enterprise. “Don’t you mention your constitutional rights here again or I’ll find you in contempt.” They are traitors.



(NaturalNews) Now we finally come to the real agenda of the vaccine industry. After vaccines have been repeatedly documented by the Natural News Lab to contain neurotoxic chemicals such as mercury, formaldehyde and MSG; after vaccine shots have been repeatedly shown to kill people who take them; and after flu shots have been exhaustively shown to be based on no science whatsoever — with vaccine manufacturers openly admitting there are no clinical trials to show they even work — the rabid vaccine pushers are unveiling their end game: throw vaccine resistors in prison.

This is the call by USA Today columnist Alex Berezow. “Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail,” he writes in this USA Today column.

And just to be clear, what Berezow means is that parents who do not vaccinated their children no matter how toxic the vaccine ingredients really are should be thrown in prison. There is no exemption being discussed or recommended that would allow parents to object to vaccines because of the neurotoxic chemicals they contain (such as the heavy metal mercury, still found in flu shots given to children in America). There is also no discussion that informed parents might reasonably object to vaccines based on the recent confession of a top CDC whistleblower who reveals how the CDC committed scientific fraud to bury scientific evidence showing a link between vaccines and autism.

But continuing with the imprisonment idea now being touted by USA Today, it begs the practical question: What exactly should happen after the parents are thrown in prison? Well, of course, the state will take custody of the children because they are now parentless.

So the suggestion that parents who seek to protect their children from toxic vaccine ingredients should be thrown in jail is simultaneously a call for the state to seize custody of all children who are not yet vaccinated with Big Pharma’s toxic vaccines.

Vaccine skepticism to be criminalized in America?

Let’s all be perfectly clear about the crux of this argument published by USA Today. Because police resources in U.S. cities are finite at any given time, Berezow is essentially arguing that law enforcement officers — who are already spread dangerously thin almost everywhere — should be diverted from stopping real criminals such as rapists, murderers and child molesters, and instead should fan out across U.S. cities, going door to door to handcuff and arrest vaccine skeptics while demanding Child Protective Services seize their children.

This argument, dutifully printed by the blindly obedient mainstream media, represents the total abandonment of scientific reasoning and the desperate invocation of the very same policies espoused by Mao, Pol Pot, Mussolini and Adolf Hitler: If the People can’t be persuaded to do what you want through reason, then force them to do so at gunpoint.

Compliance problem solved!

This is, by definition, the very essence of a medical police state. To find that such a policy is boldly called for in the pages of USA Today demonstrates just how treacherously far we have now ventured into the all-too-familiar territory of the world’s past dictatorial regimes which routinely violated human rights in the name of compliance.

And yet this column in USA Today is actually a tremendous victory for vaccine skeptics. There is no greater admission of the failure of vaccine “science” than this call for vaccines to be enforced at gunpoint. It is the wholesale abandonment of any philosophy that might respect human freedom, dignity or choice. Instead, this pronouncement equates intelligent, informed vaccine skeptics with murderers and rapists, implying they should share the same fate, if not the same prison cell.

It is an admission, ultimately, that the vaccine pushers have run out of reasonable ideas and must now resort to force as their last remaining weapon against common sense.

Medical tyranny lives in America

Berezow, like most vaccine promoters, is a medical tyrant. He openly calls for government to use the threat of violence to destroy families, ripping them apart at gunpoint and seizing their children, in order to achieve a level of vaccine compliance that Berezow claims is based on irrefutable evidence of safety and efficacy.

That evidence, of course, is entirely imagined by the vaccine industry itself — the same industry that includes printed inserts in its own vaccines which openly admit things like, “…there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”

Here’s the photo of the vaccine insert so you can see it for yourself:

As Natural News has exhaustively documented, many vaccine inserts openly admit they don’t work. Vaccine virologists working for Merck even went public with detailed admission that Merck faked vaccine clinical trials and committed scientific fraud. Beyond that, all vaccine inserts openly admit to a shockingly long list of side effects which include seizures, skin disorders, neurological problems and more:

To make a broad claim that all vaccines are “safe and effective” is to label yourself hopelessly ignorant of medical reality and utterly unqualified to comment on vaccine safety in the first place. To say “vaccines are universally safe and effective” is as cognitively incompetent as saying, “the Earth is flat” or that mercury is also good for children when it’s installed in their teeth. (That’s the official position of the American Dental Association, by the way, a chemical-pushing industry front group still hopelessly stuck in the chemical denials of the 1950’s.)

And the yet the tremendous appeal of government coercion — from the point of view of a medical tyrant — is that it no longer requires consent. This “miracle of compliance” is of course the science method of choice in North Korea, Communist China and the old U.S.S.R. The basis of the idea of coercion is that “people should be free to make their own choices, but only as long as those choices are the ones we demand they make.”

When American media outlets begin to print opinion pieces that resemble the logic of Kim Jong-Un, you know something has gone terribly awry.

No one can threaten your safety… except US!

In his USA Today column, Berezow argues that “no person has the right to threaten the safety of his community,” yet he personally threatens millions of Americans with arrest and imprisonment in his own column. He alone has the right to make such threats, you see, because his threats of taking away your children and imprisoning you as a parent are conducted under the contrived banner of “science.”

His threats don’t count as threats in exactly the same way the Obama administration’s murder of over 3,000 civilians with drone strikes don’t count as civilian casualties, either. Or how the national debt of $18 trillion — most of it accrued under Obama alone — doesn’t count either because “the federal budget is balanced!” (Hint: it isn’t.)

Speaking of civilian casualties, in the name of “science,” Berezow obviously wants to see an armed medical Gestapo going house to house, taking children away from parents and turning them over to the state while those parents are incarcerated in a prison system that’s already bursting at the seams.

This picture imagines what a future vaccine enforcement police team might look like:

The same government that Berezow hopes would use armed police to enforce vaccine compliance has, of course, already granted absolute legal immunity to vaccine manufacturers. So children who are harmed by vaccines have no legitimate legal recourse.

The obvious catch-22 is damning to the industry: Here, take these vaccines at gunpoint, but if your child is harmed or even killed by these vaccines we’ve forced upon you, that’s your problem, not ours. Even the Associated Press recently conducted an investigation into the kangaroo vaccine court system in the United States and concluded it was a comedy of justice that denied payouts to parents for ten years or more.

This imprisonment argument by Berezow also begs the question: Does Mr. Berezow support government coercion and the threat of violence against the citizens of America solely in the arena of vaccines? Or does he also think government should arrest and imprison people who don’t comply with the government’s wishes in all other areas, too?

By Berezow’s own logic, people who refuse to purchase Obamacare health insurance should also be arrested and imprisoned. Probably even people who write about vaccine dangers should be arrested and imprisoned too, by simply legislating that pesky First Amendment out of existence. And why stop there? Why not arrest and imprison people who refuse to testify against themselves, refuse to quarter government soldiers in their private homes, refuse to submit to illegal searches and seizures or refuse to remain silent in their own defense?

Perhaps one day the government will demand that everybody eat Soylent Green. Those who refuse will not merely be arrested, but scooped up and “processed” into more Soylent Green to force-feed to the obedient, ignorant masses.

USA Today promotes a medical police state

The fact that USA Today would even run a column like this shows the late hour of the medical police state which the American people have apathetically allowed to emerge under their watch. In an era where the U.S. government now openly spies on all our phone calls, emails and phone texts — and where the Obama administration has prosecuted more truth-telling whistleblowers than any other administration in U.S. history — the systems of oppression, propaganda and control have reached a tipping point of public revolt.

The mass militarization of local police forces across the country is a screaming red alert that civil liberties are being crushed while the government itself seems to be arming for war against the American people. Local police departments now possess mine-resistant armored cars, automatic military weapons, surveillance drones and even futuristic thermal vision devices that can see through walls. If vaccine skepticism is criminalized, all these weapons of war — many transferred to police departments after returning from the front lines of battle in the Middle East — will be turned against citizens who refuse to inject their children with the toxic chemical poisons still found in vaccines.

This picture imagines what a future vaccine enforcement police vehicle might look like:

The next simple step is to declare vaccine skeptics to be “domestic terrorists.” From that point, all varieties of government coercion, violence, torture and murder of these people is “ethically justified” according to the vaccine pushers.

Rather than removing the toxic chemicals, the vaccine industry wants to force them on you at gunpoint

Public trust in the government is at an all-time low. Public trust in the lying mainstream media continues to plummet by the day. Public trust in toxic vaccines continues to fall as well, and this trend will never be reversed until the vaccine industry decides to remove toxic heavy metals and chemicals from its vaccines (if ever).

Rather than cleaning up its own products, the vaccine industry turns to people who call for government violence against citizens in order to achieve involuntary compliance.

We’ve seen these kind of people before, of course. They are the same kind of people who shoved Obamacare down our throats, hitting us all with hefty fines if we refuse to purchase an insurance product that the government totally lied about with claims that it would be “affordable.” Remember, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?” It’s the same kind of malicious lie uttered by vaccine poisoners who claim vaccines are “totally safe and effective.”

But in his USA Today column, Berezow ups the ante. He does not merely call for vaccine skeptics to be fined. That financial coercion tactic is apparently too mild for a man who is so sure he’s 100% correct that he’s willing to bet YOUR family on it. No, Berezow calls for vaccine skeptics to be arrested and imprisoned. If you do not get your children vaccinated, he unabashedly argues, you are an enemy of the state.

He’s sure of it. In fact, he knows far better than you what should be injected into your children. You are too stupid to know the right answer, he implies, so leave it to the pharma companies that conduct deadly drug experiments on children to tell you what to do with your own children.

Inform yourself of the facts about Big Pharma’s ongoing chemical child abuse by reading about The top ten medical conspiracies that actually happened.

I want to thank Berezow for finally removing all doubt about the true agenda of the vaccine pushers. I’m sure it won’t be long before non-vaccinated children and adults will be required by law to wear Scarlet-letter shame symbols much like the Jews in 1939, and at some point people like Berezow will no doubt call for parents who don’t vaccinate their children to be rounded up and sent to “re-education camps” where they will be subjected to PowerPoint presentations dreamed up by GlaxoSmithKline, the same company found guilty of felony bribery crimes by the U.S. Dept. of Justice.

Medical freedom was almost written into the U.S. Constitution

Berezow has done us a service in all this, however. He has made the argument for a national “medical freedom” amendment to the United States Constitution.

It is because of tyrant-minded people like Berezow that America’s founders created a First Amendment, Second Amendment, Third Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment and so on. All of these Constitutional amendments grew out of systematic government abuses of civil liberties and human freedoms.

Interestingly, a “medical freedom” amendment was also considered at the time by Dr. Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence. Over 230 years ago, he warned:

“Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a Special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom.”

Dr. Rush, in other words, foresaw precisely the kind of medical tyranny now published by USA Today. “Medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship” is exactly what we’ve seen happen. That dictatorship, argues Berezow, should be enforced at gunpoint by the government itself. This is the definition of fascism: a corporate-government partnership to force obedience onto the population through coercion dished out under the threat of violence and incarceration.

USA Today should be ashamed that it has published a medical dictatorship propaganda piece that would have made Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels proud.

When the facts don’t support the agenda, turn to government guns instead

The call to imprison vaccine resistors is an open admission that the SCIENCE behind vaccines isn’t compelling and must therefore be replaced with GUNS.

How else will you arrest people, take their children away and imprison them unless you bring men with guns and badges to the “guilty” households, anyway? Where junk science fails, government guns are clearly the answer. And if guns alone don’t work, they always have tanks, too.

In essence, the argument being made in the USA Today column is that guns should be used to force vaccine compliance. It’s not even a leap, as guns in the hands of government goons are already being used to force children into toxic chemotherapy treatments against their will.

Click here to read the list of government-sponsored medical kidnappings taking place in America right now. This list will, of course, never be published by USA Today for the simple reason that these real medical facts are not consistent with the mainstream media’s vaccine propaganda agenda.

Why stop at vaccines? Why not threaten to arrest anyone who disagrees with a doctor on anything?

If total medical compliance — at any cost to human freedom and dignity — is the goal, then why not launch a whole new domestic army called D.M.S.; the Department of Medical Security. Declare that all who oppose Big Pharma’s medical advice are “threats to national security” and ship them all to Gitmo where the U.S. government continues to run torture operations.

Once you start down the road of medical tyranny, it doesn’t end well for humanity. Just ask the victims of the Nazi chemical conglomerate IG Farben, which was later split into chemical corporations, one of which is now known as Bayer. Under the guidance of the “science” of Nazi Germany, heinous chemical crimes were committed against countless Jews, including gassing them to death and using Jewish prisoners for medical experiments.

The former chairperson of Bayer, for the record, was convicted of Nazi war crimes at the Nuremburg tribunals and sentenced to prison. Today, pharma executives routinely commit felony crimes yet go free, even while USA Today calls for parents to be imprisoned for saying no to Big Pharma’s deadly chemicals.

No doubt the vaccine promoters of today who demand the arrest and imprisonment of American vaccine resisters would also approve of using those prisoners for their medical experiments. See the full history of U.S. medical experiments here, here and here. Most of these inhumane medical experiments were carried out against prisoners, minorities or soldiers.

It’s quite clear that the very same ethically-perverse medical system that’s right now calling for the imprisonment of vaccine skeptics would, of course, have no hesitation using those people for “important medical research in the interests of the public good.”

This is how crimes against humanity are born. You are watching it unfold right before your very eyes, right in America today, in the pages of USA Today. This is history in the making, and it is a history that will march us all right down the road of state-sponsored medical terrorism that’s openly supported by the mainstream media.

Some people learn from the mistakes of history. But Berezow is determined to repeat them.

Learn more:


Picture 27~James is going to Doggie Appeals Court tomorrow. I sh!t you not. This is like when 3 pounds of marihunie was the ‘Respondent.’

The presumed Commercial Court-ship on the high seas of Commerce is THE un-American sham, scam, and dis-grace threatening all that draws a breath.

This is NOT about the dog! This is Not action at law. This is equity. We want law. Not equity.

Business IS due process:

What do we want to know?                                                                                             We want to know the Facts Not in Evidence.

Where’s the Verified Complaint?                                                                                       No, Not the Complaint of a Terrorist after the fact of terrorizing We the People.

Who is injured before law with a Verified Complaint of Facts entered into evidence? A Verified Complaint Affidavit signed by the Accuser Terrorist, under Oath with penalties for perjury. –Stated & sworn to words-on-paper Fact, that the Accuser Terrorist witnessed Defendant-in-error committing a crime –intentional injury to another or another’s property, or Breaching the Peace,

The Persecutor Entity is known in the freedom community as an “incompetent fact witness” –beecause he’s not a party to it. He wasn’t there, and therefore, can’t lawfully enter anything into the case. Under Oath and on the stand, an “incompetent fact witness” won’t/can’t testify to Fact s/he did not witness.

Motion for Dismissal, or Move it to the Federal District Court where unalienable Rights’ violations can be heard. Get out of Their sandbox!! We the People have no business there. We want law, NOT equity.

Clerks masquerading as Judges with no evidence for THEIR claim, is no cigar.                 No bond = No office.

Facts Not in Evidence.

  1. May I have your Name? {ask to any of the Public Pretenders}
  2. Do you have an unlimited liability claim against Me?
  1. Does any one in here now today have an unlimited liability claim against Me?     [you’ll be able to hear a pin drop. Fact and Fiction can’t meet. You are the Only real substance/currency in the Public Theater venue].
  1. Seeing that business is finished, I’m leaving. [For Kansas]

Some who are shamelessly ‘going to the show,’ may have a friend who really enjoys performing for the people in open court. Offer them this opportunity!

Arraignment is after the probable cause hearing. Iff the probable cause hearing was skipped . . .than due process was not served. At the probable cause initiatory hearing, the accuser/plaintiff Must be present. He’s the one who brings this ‘contractural’ case to be settled in this venue. The Plaintiff Must be present. The Plaintiff is the one who stands to benefit, who brought the wrong to right, eh? So, the Plaintiff must be present with a bona fide claim, stating a claim for which relief can be granted.


12STOCKTON — Citizens in Stockton, California have taken a new approach to activism.

Rather than sticking to the traditional form of protest in which signs are held and slogans are chanted, these citizens have taken direct action and offered a grassroots, crowd-funded incentive structure to end police brutality in their community.

They have offered a $2,500 reward to anybody who submits information leading to the arrest or termination of cops who brutalize or kill people.

They were able to let people know about the offer by printing all the details on flyers and spreading them throughout their community.

The flyer specifically names 15 cops as a start, and includes pictures of at least 10 cops who have been involved in either the brutalization or killing of Americans.

The words “Know Your Killer Cops” are printed on the flyers, along with instructions to film any police brutality and a location where the footage can be submitted.

“Stockton police have been getting away with terrorizing our citizens for far too long,” the flyer says.

“It is time to take back our streets.”

There is also a Stockton Police Department Corruption Reporting page on facebook where citizens can submit the footage.

The flyers were given out at the local courthouse and seem to have motivated citizens even more to start scrutinizing the actions of police.

With a $2,500 reward and with so many Americans unemployed, it is not hard to imagine many spending all day in the streets monitoring cops and starting their own patrols to earn the money.

10730109_351447035035267_6860291329381959657_nOne wonders what would happen if such a reward system was increased, offered nationwide, crowd-funded online, or funded by wealthy anti-authoritarians.

Suppose a secure website were started where people donated in a currency such as Bitcoin, the donations would be anonymously pooled and verified, and the pool is offered to the first person who submits information leading to the termination or arrest of a specific officer.

Knowing that the funds are available, it is virtually guaranteed that citizens would take heightened measures to crack down on criminal cops. It would also empower communities to believe that with adequate training and resources, they can protect themselves rather than relying on a Police State.

Police are deeply concerned about the idea, however. Stockton Police Chief Eric Jones said that the flyer “appears to invite retribution against our officers.”

“I’m concerned that the flyer might be intended to put officers at risk, which would be reprehensible, and it is sad and disheartening to see a flyer like this with a $2,500 bounty,” he added.

He then alluded to the recent assassination of two NYPD officers, and expressed disappointment that such a flyer would be created in the wake of growing anti-police sentiment.

It is difficult to see why this flyer would worry officers. The worries could be understood if there were a crowd-funded system that offered to anonymously deliver currency to the first person who, say, assassinates a specific officer, but that would be illegal and the flyer is doing no such thing. It is simply asking for video footage of and information about cops who break the law.

One of the activists who passed out the flyer replied, saying that the flyer is just informing the public that these people should be monitored and watched, and that it’s your right and responsibility to film the police. If there’s nothing that was done wrong, there’s nothing to be afraid of. If you’re calling a reward for accountability and wrongdoing a “bounty,” then that implies that somebody did something wrong. If there’s nothing to hide, they would laugh at it, but they know it’s serious. Their golden image is tarnished. This type of activism is not good for them and their image. That’s why they don’t care for it.

Now that the idea is spreading, other communities are sure to implement similar incentive structures to curb police brutality — indeed, it wouldn’t be surprising if a grassroots program like this is started nationwide.

Watch the video below to see an example of Stockton police brutality, where officers can be seen breaking a protester’s arm and kicking him while he was restrained:


Today we have the City of Eureka’s Clerk, Pamela Powell, moaning out a final death whimper with a Statist’s response. To Pamela’s bent way of in-the-crypt 20th century slave-speak thinking, (and this is a first) she decides to return Queen’s claim! She rattles on about Government Codes and My only remedy is to GET AN ATTORNEY! Too funny. AS IFF fact and Fiction can ever meet. Crimany I’m dealing with morons. These are the criminals and thieves extorting their opulent paychecks from the Public Treasury without evidence for their claim, i.e. a bond to back up their Government position. And the best way they can right-brain think is to stick their heads in the sand, asses up, and return truth to the fully awake. Next.

No, of course Queen didn’t open Fiction’s mailing. Since I’m imprisoned in my own home, thanks to the City of Fortuna’s two armed males car theft of November 12th, my mailman accommodates me by bringing these empty threats to me –and it’s not too hard to read through a thin manila envelope – at a cost to the people of $8.61 for mailing.

Pamela Powell is not a BAR member. Oh oops, she’s doing the same thing that they all do – change hats from the Executive branch into the delusional 4th branch of Government – the BAR-barians.   Hello! Felony, insurrection, sedition and treason against the people.

“How it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unaccountable as the appearance of Djin when Aladdin rubbed his lamp.” Thomas Henry Huxley


Daniel Dowling                                                                                                               Activist Post

Freedom is ensured by intelligent thought and courageous action upon that thought. Unintelligent thought, or action not coupled by thought in the pursuit of comfort, security or pleasure, is the first chain in the link of slavery. If slavery is all one has ever known, then they will accept their chains as freedom and will protect them at all costs; subjective reality is powerful. There is no amount of force that can compel a person to seek truth and freedom, but, in the conspicuous absence of truth in the largest channels of influence, even the smallest seed can spark a sea change in a person, given time and space. Anything that defies State-rhetoric will be puzzling and curious to one who supports the State, and it will also be taken as an opportunity to regurgitate State-programmed defenses with pride and gratification.

All supporters of the State are necessarily chauvinistic and rely heavily upon emotion and force, so, the utilization of emotion and force in arguments with these types will not resound and will fall upon deaf ears, like scream-talking at a rock concert; nobody will hear you, and you’ll only hurt yourself. It is in these instances that sound logic must be employed to thoroughly examine all points of Statist inquisition. To fuel the angsty rage that is so common in defenders of the State is to further the cause, so in a conversation or debate, respect must be prioritized; respect is diametric to the State, and is powerful, yet subtle. If the questioner is not willing to allow you time and space to flesh out an argument and interrupts incessantly, then it is your responsibility to egress gracefully; otherwise, the debate will become an ego-masturbation for both parties and nothing useful will have occurred. The foremost mission of any libertarian or anarchist is to effect peace in a broken world, and this clearly cannot be accomplished by brute force. Arm yourself with logic, and with temperance in your speech and kindness in your heart, any seeds of truth that you sow will have a much greater chance of germinating.

The following is a sample of 5 commonplace questions directed at libertarians or anarchists that, if handled logically and gracefully, can become learning experiences for both parties.

  1. “Show me a time where anarchism has ever worked in history?!” This is often stated emphatically, as if it is an end-all-be-all in the discussion.

Statists often employ this doozie when all else has failed in their attempts to defend a broken and dead idea, but it does not hold water. Very simply, you can point to any egalitarian and native tribe with no formal or written law, but a spirit of prevailing voluntaryism. These tribes exist throughout Africa, and anywhere the false concept of Government has yet to permeate the culture.

Anarchism has worked wherever there was a failure in Government response. Every time a natural disaster strikes, is the rescue and clean up effort organized by government, or people? Do people help people after these disasters because they are governed by law to do so, or is it because they are men and women who are naturally predisposed to help others in need? This is one instance of anarchism that is especially relevant today; the gross failures of Government agencies in recent times of disaster (Sandy, Katrina) have assured us of the ineptitude of Government, but until we as a people have declared self-sovereignty and reliance upon people rather than artificial systems, the State iniquities will continue and people will suffer.

If this does not satisfy, and the Statist presses for large countries that have operated under anarchism successfully, all one has to do is turn the tables. What State has ever successfully operated without extorting and murdering its denizens, and waging war for resources and power? This has never occurred, and if they try to use the lesser-of-two-evils fallacy, point out the false dialectic. The ends can never justify the means; this is immoral and unintelligent. If you can’t think of a better way to live without harming people or threatening people in order to enforce “charity”, then stand aside and let peaceful people do it for you, but don’t you dare tell me I should be put in jail for noncompliance with a system that thrives off of death and extortion. The State is a hideous monster that extracts wealth for redistribution at the threat of a gun — this is the opposite of peace and has nothing to do with welfare; and if one claims that this is necessary because people are inherently bad and cannot govern themselves, then have them examine this….

People are bad so they need to be governed by people are bad so they need to be governed by people are bad so they need to be governed by…

There is no magical effect in a system set up by people to control people — these are all people, and anyone who claims that the system is necessary for order is illogical by the simplest of reasoning. The whole is not greater than the sum of the parts — all of the parts of government are people, and there is no metaphysical leverage that modifies the output of these interconnected men and women in government. Government is too many cooks in the kitchen. There is no magic in a construct of man that protects man from man; it is simply false, and this has been proven in every Government time and again throughout history.

  1. “But how would anything ever get done? You have to have resources and financing to accomplish anything, you know, and this is why we need Government.”

Look at joblessness and homelessness and food insecurity and our crumbling national infrastructure and soaring rates of pollution and decrepit education systems and…the list can go on and on. If people under the illusion of Government ever accomplished anything charitable, the resources for the task were summoned under the threat of violence, which is neither civil nor tolerable, and anyone who would prop up this stance is amoral and guilty of the “ends justifying the means” fallacy.

Secondly, has there never been a single organization that accomplished anything altruistic outside of the shackles of Government? People become unreasonable when defending a bad idea because it is false, and if the idea is not true, then there are no reasonable means to argue for it. This is an especially incendiary remark to hear when vomited from the mouth of a so-called Christian. How much humanitarian work has been accomplished through churches alone? Wells have been drilled, roads have been built, shelters have been erected, wounds have been healed, starving bodies have been nourished and minds have been educated in more instances than can be counted, all without the “aid” of Government, and more to the point, all despite Government. The hoops and ladders one must flip through and vault over to establish a charity are ridiculous, to say nothing of the Policy Police that arrest people for feeding the homeless!

People generally care about people…Except for the people that commission people with money generated at the threat of violence towards other people to protect those same people against people at the threat of violence because people are bad — this does not add up. In the latter case, they just care about false intellectualization of principles they did not invent, but nonetheless had attached to their egos and refused to let go, in order to protect their egos. It is important to be sensitive when speaking with these types, because no amount of force can or will change their minds, but it will only prompt them to protect their assumed ego identity with all the falseness that can be mustered. The most effective way to teach is the ” watch and learn” method, aside from revealing the glaring untruths that the State operates on. Beautiful people making real differences in their families and communities is an inspiring thing, and it cannot be denied by even the staunchest advocates of the State.

  1. “Get real. So what happens when you have a rapist murderer come into your community of voluntaryists (supercilious emphasis on voluntaryists) who starts raping and murdering all of your children?! What then!”

So, you really think a large group of people who are smart enough to find a way to live peacefully and share without subjugating the entire group’s freedom would just have their heads in the sand and asses in the air when it comes to the laughable “lone predator scenario”? I’m not a non-lethal weapons expert, nor a security expert…I’m a writer. But, I do know that those types of people exist, and I also know that there is a good chance that a few of those people might be willing to associate through the principles of voluntaryism. There is this ridiculous notion that as the State fades away, so does justice, but this idea is almost criminally insane. The State is the chief perpetrator of wickedness!

Every aspect of bureaucracy is corrupted and tweaked to extort, from the highway robbery speeding tickets and traffic fines that provide military-grade weaponry and Corvettes for police, to the militarized IRS that terrorizes people who refuse to pay into a war machine and abortion funding nightmare, to the cleptomaniacal creep-mutants known as the TSA… Do we even have to mention the endless wars for oil and drugs that kill tens of thousands of innocents and civilians abroad each year?

The State’s judicial system puts away more non-violent offenders than harmful predators because the “justice” system is actually just another construct to extract wealth…at the threat of violence! Broken record, I know. Private for-profit prisons (profiting from “justice”- a novel concept!) are actually selling their slave labor to corporations who reap the man-power for $1.25 an hour… This is overt slavery, and it is extremely profitable. Still don’t think you have anything to hide from dragnet state agencies like Homeland Security and the NSA? So, who would you trust — A convening group of real people in the community where a transgression occurred, or, an apotheosized priest in black robes who makes obscene amounts of money and gets paid through the extortion and robbery of his fellow man in order to protect the interests of the so-called elite who cut his paycheck? This black-clothed man or woman is also in cahoots with the private prison industry that undeniably supports overt slavery. If one takes the time to do the research, this case is closed.

  1. “But if our government and national defense collapses because of all the damned anarchists, then what happens when China and Russia want to come steal our land?”

People…This is an internal revolution we are talking about here. Goodness springs from within and cannot be effected externally, which is the whole idea of anarchism/voluntaryism. There will be no time when a whole country is anarchist and defenseless while another country is prowling about like Wile. E. Coyote looking for an opportunity to snatch us up, because ideas are not contained within national borders — those are imaginary things that don’t make a difference in the real world. Also, just because people are peaceful doesn’t mean they can’t kick ass — some of the friendliest and most generous people I’ve ever known have been certified badasses who would sooner die than be taken advantage of. The idea that our freedom must be sacrificed for any measure of safety is sheer cowardice; and it is not sound logic, because the thing that is forcibly prevented will always rebound against the pressure that attempts to stifle it. Think of a boiling pot. Try to put a lid over it and the steam will rise from any particular point, but when you attempt to force the steam to remain in the pot, it will spill over on all sides in deleterious fashion! Such is the nature of Government, where no protection has ever been granted in all of its bombastic promises.

The idea that anarchy could be confined to one country is ludicrous, but the fear of attack for living peacefully is equally absurd. If you are scared to give and to associate freely with neighbors and loved ones for fear of extermination by those who oppose the idea, you haven’t yet experienced the power of love. Love is all creative, and love is the solution which makes every problem a growing experience, so to fear a movement that is entirely founded in love is to simply live in fear. Nobody has time for that because, for everyday we live in fear, the damage effected by fear-based decisions will push us closer to the looming point of no return on this planet. Peace is needed now, and, as has been demonstrated by the last 10,000 years, authority outside of the self will prevent us from achieving it. Prevention is the essence of government.

“If you told me the world was going to end tomorrow, I’d still plant my flowers just the same” – some badass Zen Granny.

Live free or die. Tis better to die freely than to live in fear, for life goes on after death,          and fear opposes life.

  1. “But it wasn’t always this way. If we just got back to our founding fathers’ principles, it could be just like the glory days – ‘Murica!”

Aaaaand then we would wait another 200 years while liberties are gradually eroded, again, so that we can have this exact discussion… infinitum. Or not.

Government is a moral vacuum, and it is false because it does not exist in nature. Government will only exist for as long as people refuse the power of self-sovereignty — the power must go somewhere, and it will always go to power-hungry individuals; this is the road to despotism, and it happens rapaciously. With the concession of one liberty there is initialized a vacuum that will not stop and will continue to suck until all goodness has been depleted from the minds and bodies of the people who consent thusly, and such is the state in which we find ourselves today, after so many generations.

A contrived solution conjured to satisfy the masses’ appetite for security will appear good on the surface, otherwise no one would buy it. However, there will be men and women with morals and intellect in tact who will see the folly and the hubris, and they will cry out in defense of sanity for others to observe the clear imprudence of such a scheme. For the majority who buy it without thought but with chauvinism, they will marvel at their apparent victory, and denigrate any of the opposition who were calling for reason. They may live their entire lives justified by the apparent success with minimal atrocities, but time will reveal the error, and after so much momentum had been drawn by the moral vacuum of a false idea, the fruits of such a system will be more than apparent. After so much time has elapsed past the initial lie that was bought and internalized, even the dullest among the population will cry out, ” This is clearly evil, we must abolish it!” but they will ask for nothing better than the original lie they were fed, and so they will sell out their future generations into slavery for temporary relief.

This is what happens when faith is put outside of nature and outside of reality. Falseness will cause harm in time, so it is up to us to exercise our intellects and spot the lie so that we may valiantly defend and create our own freedom in the present without selling out our future for a measure of comfort and security. Men and women exist in nature, as do their hearts and souls, and so these are the things that we must trust and put faith in, rather than the systems that are so distinctly separate from reality, which oppose the freedom and prosperity of real men and women.

The laws of the universe are written in our hearts. No fictitious entity can lay claim to a law that has been in effect since time immemorial, and so it is up to each of us to ask the right questions and to live truthfully and fruitfully so that there will be no perceived need for this crutch of a system to limp into the future with.

As men and women, we are born as creators, not preventers. The whole idea of Government is prophylactic; and it not only doesn’t prevent harm, as we can see just how injurious it is, but it also prevents the full expressions of our being when the false concept is internalized and accepted. We are free. Free to give, free to contribute, free to associate, free to speak, free to succeed and free to fail. We are free to live beautifully, and in such a way that harms no one in order to achieve our loving ends. Freedom by its very nature is a choice, and so it is up to us to choose freedom in all aspects of our life, and expect it to be granted by no one other than ourselves. Freedom can be granted by no one other than ourselves.


Fraudulent Fiction – the City of Fortuna’s Risk Management – AFTER the fact of the Lien Sale of Queen’s personal property/transportation last week, two months of attempting to communicate with the City of Fortuna’s Mayor, City Council, Chief of Policy Police, two armed roadside bandits and the idiots at Eel River Transportation and Salvage –Guess what? City of Fortuna’s Risk Management Now, Now, sends a Certified Mail to ME –hahahahahahahahaha. AS IF Queen is all-of-a-sudden going to step into Commerce.

They (the City of Fortuna -a quasi-municipality), could have invoked the, available to us all, power of ‘thinking’ for themselves and settled this November 17 – a short five days after the viet armis (force of arms) highway robbery –and Queen would not have looked behind. That was offer #1 from the living to the dead. Offer #2 was signed, sealed, and delivered w/receipt signatures of same, for them to come to Their (common) sense(s). Funny how Fiction picks up on the power of contract, after They’ve signed contract with M-wa.

Poor fools. They remain willfully ignorant. They cannot figure out contract infringement between Myself and the seller of my Bravada. They cannot figure out that I have NOTHING to do with a contract between the City of Fortuna Police Dept. & Eel River T & S. But now, They expect queen to sign a contract with Fiction. LMAO!

Didn’t I tell Them? Didn’t I do it with honor? Didn’t I give Them umpteen chances, including emails, to step up to the plate? Didn’t I tell Them Paul Gallegos denied Me a hearing on December 18th? Yep. This queen did.

As of yesterday, Maggie Fleming, (Humboldt’s D.A. replacing the less-than-human Paul Gallegos), has been honorably asked to step-in and stop this local insanity. She professes, among other things, to be concerned about ‘Elder Abuse.’ Hmmm.   We’ll see.

Truth has no secrets.


Persons without proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds OR satisfy the necessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office,” by ‘commission,’ “election,” or “appointment.” In short, an “Officer” or “Office Holder” cannot ‘occupy’ the office under false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which strips the ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law of the land and sea. Brutum fulmen!* Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subject to claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619.

A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles” of “office” [Oath, Bond, Commission].

One cannot act upon being ‘duly appointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by INCORPORATION and CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS.

A Government/Public trust is supposed to operate on taxes, and if a Government operates commercial enterprises using tax money in competition with a free enterprise public, then the money of the people is being used in competition with the people, and that will discourage the payment and collection of taxes. It will cause a tax rebellion (Conflict of interest). Therefore, all revenue raised by a Government’s offices of public trust must be obtained by the performance of Public Service not provided by ordinary free enterprise businesses. Public Service is the Only sort of business in which Government is supposed to be employed.

“Nor shall private property [taxes] be taken for public use without just compensation by Government.” Fifth Article in the Bill of Rights.

Essentially, the Only lawful personal tax assessable for operating a Government is a per capita-tax determined by dividing the proven cost of operating the Government by the number of people.

All alleged ‘Public Servants’ are serving ‘Public Policy’ and ‘Public Administration’ of the ‘laws’ and enforcing those laws to protect the CORPORATION, to the disinterest and detriment of the People, whom have been ‘captured,’ ‘searched,’ ‘seized,’ ‘boarded,’ as with a ‘vessel,’ and which the People have been placed into ‘warehouse storage’ as ‘human capital’ and ‘property’ of the de facto Government, which/who have conquered and occupied the Office of the People, and subverted and subordinated it into an Office of Inquisition for YOU KNOW WHO!!

Everyone who has ever been inside a State of CA. Administrative or judicial ‘law’ proceeding, or been before any ‘Clerk’ or ‘Judge’ of same, or been prosecuted by any County District A within said State/STATE, has been within a “brutum fulmen”:

*Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition: “brutum fulmen” – “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in Legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone. Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348.”