I will be on the Our Natural Rights talk radio program on Monday 6 July at 6:00 PM Pacific Time. Anyone interested in listening or calling in can do so at the link below.
by 6 days ago
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has handed down three consecutive rulings affirming the right of Americans to be free from government overreach. The Rutherford Institute advanced arguments in all three cases, which respectively deal with the use of tasers and excessive force by prison officials (Kingsley v. Hendrickson); the practice of police gaining unfettered access to motel and hotel guest registries (City of Los Angeles v. Patel); and the government’s confiscation of agricultural crops without any guarantee or promise of payment (Horne v. U.S. Department of Agriculture).
“In a police state, there is no need for judges, juries or courts of law, because the police act as judge, jury and law, and their version of justice is one-sided, delivered at the end of a gun, taser or riot stick,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “While these rulings may not fix all that is wrong with our present police state, they go a long way towards reminding government officials that they are not above the law, whether you’re talking about agricultural boards and raising farmers, prison officials and excessive force, or hotel registries and the right to privacy.”
In a 5-4 ruling in Kingsley v. Hendrickson, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a lower court used an improper test to determine whether guards used excessive force against a pretrial detainee. Pointing out that individuals awaiting trial (pretrial detainees) are particularly vulnerable to government abuse and should not be forced to prove that their alleged abusers intended to harm them in order to claim their rights were violated, Rutherford Institute attorneys had asked the Supreme Court to remove restrictions some courts have imposed on civil rights lawsuits for excessive force by inmates against jail personnel, thereby discouraging the use of excessive force by prison officials. The case involves a Wisconsin man who alleges that he was subjected to unreasonable and excessive force in reckless disregard for his safety when prison guards forcibly removed him from his jail cell and subdued him with a stun gun. Affiliate attorney Stephen J. Neuberger of The Neuberger Firm assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in Kingsley.
In a 5-4 ruling in Horne v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Supreme Court declared that raisin farmer Marvin Horne deserves to be compensated for the official seizure of one-third of his personal property by the government. Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute had argued that the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on government confiscation of property applies not only to the appropriation of land but with full and equal force to personal property such as agricultural crops. The case arose after independent raisin farmers in California were fined almost $700,000 for refusing to surrender about 40% of the raisins they produced to the government as part of a program purportedly aimed at maintaining a stable market for commodities. Affiliate attorney Christopher F. Moriarty of Motely Rice LLC assisted The Rutherford Institute in presenting arguments in Horne.
In a 5-4 ruling in City of Los Angeles v. Patel, the Supreme Court struck down a Los Angeles ordinance that permits the police to check guest registries at motels and hotels at any hour of the day or night without a warrant or other judicial review. Citing a fundamental right to privacy, travel and association, The Rutherford Institute had argued that the ordinance, which is similar to laws on the books in cities across the nation, flies in the face of historical protections affording hotel guests privacy in regards to their identities and comings-and-goings and burdens the fundamental rights of travel and association. Affiliate attorneys Anand Agneshwar and Grace K. Chang of Arnold & Porter, LLP, assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in Patel.
I really love what Arthur Cristian and his family do, very interesting story of their fight to survive.
If we do not re-ignite the glimmers of our souls, of who we really are, we will be lost to “The System” of e-go forevermore…
This programming, the education, instruction, explanation, is what forms the e-go, our fake, system personas that we exhibit throughout our daily performance in “The System.”
It is all contrived, none of it naturally created by us.
Everything in commerce is THEIR fiction, not ours. I do not function in fiction but most people do without knowing what it is they are doing. Who are you? But the even more important question is, who aren’t you? It does not help “us,” it helps YOU…but first you must KNOW who you are not. I am not embracing anything except the information that allows me to “see” the truth. You do not see what I see…yet. Your mind is not open to seeing anything other than what you have been taught to believe. The information I am sharing did not come from any book or even from the internet. It is in the Universe which means that anyone can tap in to it and see what I see. I can’t teach you how to open your mind but anything is possible and this is what you must first understand. I am just a man. So are you but you are not acting like a man. I don’t mean that in the ego sense, but rather, in the sense of the world. Your inability to grasp the importance of what I have done is not abnormal; in fact, unfortunately, it IS the norm.
Do you control everything in your life? You can, but first you must let go of what you can not control…that is, every thing that exists outside of reality that you have no control over. That Fictional world of commerce? You did not create any of it but it controls your mind. If it controls your mind, it controls YOU. Your mindset must be in the proper place and you must open your mind to what the world of commerce REALLY is. It is ALL an illusion, a Fiction. That COLB (Certificate of Live Birth) is a very big part of that Fictional world of commerce but how can one prove that he or she is not a “part” of it? First, you must STOP partaking. You must give back what is NOT yours…only then may you receive what really IS yours. That is, you stop functioning within the “Matrix,” that fictional world of commerce that you think is real.
So now, having explained this initial step, I shall move forward with the reason one must file with the Secretary of State what is called an “Assumed Name Certificate” (ANC). First of all, the written law requires that you do so. Where? Section “333” of the Revised Minnesota Statutes is the place you will find this verbiage: “Any name that is used in commerce for a profit in this state MUST be filed with the Secretary of State (SOS).” So now stop and think, is that COLB legal name one of those names required to be filed? YES, of course it is! You use that name as if it were “identifying” YOU, the man. The problem is, it was never intended to identify a man, it was created by the Government to identify an entity. More specifically, a business entity that operates in commerce “Legally” for that man for whom it was created. That SSN that is assigned to that COLB has a specific purpose as well; that is, to identify the specific business entity that has filed. Why? Because there are most certainly other people in the world that may have that same “Legal NAME” and the ANC rules clearly state that filing with the SOS does not copyright or trademark that NAME, it simply registers it so that it can be verified by anyone that wishes to evidence that NAME is indeed properly registered and has a status of “Active and In Good Standing.” That status is the same sort of status that a “Corporation” has when it has been properly filed with the SOS and registered with that Government agency to operate in commerce. There exists one MAJOR difference; that is, the ANC is NOT a license, it is merely a “dba” (Doing Business As) and that is a significant difference. Why? Because any license is a license to break the law. If you have a driver’s license for example, all a law enforcement officer has to do is accuse you of breaking a law and the burden of proof is on YOU to prove otherwise. Why? Because you are claiming to be a Fictional entity, not a living man. How does one prove they are a man and not a Fictional entity? The ANC does that and THAT my friend is the sole purpose of that filing with the SOS. Now you do not need a license or “permit” to drive, or to build a home, or to buy a car…or to do anything else you desire. Your registered business entity operates in commerce FOR you which proves that the COLB legal NAME can’t possibly be YOU. So this comes back to that first understanding of who we really are, and more importantly, who we are NOT. You are NOT that Legal NAME on the COLB but you must be able to prove this to anyone that inquires because there exists a “presupposition” that EVERY ONE is that “person” (entity) that is known as a “Legal NAME” and most people step right in to the trap of going down to the County or to the SOS where that COLB was created and pays to get a “certified” copy of the COLB. Then they unknowingly place themselves in harms way by using that COLB (which they VOLUNTARILY paid for) and they obtain a “driver’s license” which requires an ‘image’ of THEM on a card right next to a “First Middle Last” NAME that is NOT their name, but rather, a Fictional entity created by Government for a man (or woman) to use in commerce. When you operate as a Fictional character in Their world of commerce (thinking of course that the COLB Legal NAME IS you), you are breaking the law without even knowing it! Which explains why having that driver’s license is simply a license to break the law because it PROVES that you have not filed that COLB name with the SOS as the law clearly requires.
Remember, ignorance of the “law” is no excuse, right? So now, that goes both ways. Once you “comply” with the law by filing with the SOS and registering that Legal NAME, you are no longer in violation of the law and can prove that COLB Legal NAME is NOT YOU! That “presupposition” is immediately put to rest and the tables turn 180 degrees in YOUR favor because Government employees are not told what I have just shown you to be the truth. If they damage you and/or your business entity in ANY way, you have “standing” in a court provided you are able to evidence that “Legal NAME” on that COLB has been properly filed with the SOS and has a status of “Active and In Good Standing.” Now you know why a judge has total “discretion” in deciding your “case” because you are providing him or her with that discretion by failing to have any “standing” on Their court. Your registered business entity evidences that you as CEO have standing in ANY court and therefore any and all discretion that judge may assume to have is not provided and more specifically, because you are able to evidence that (your) Legal NAME has standing, you can properly defend yourself and if need be, sue ANY corporation (including the United States, Inc.) and win. Why? Because the burden of proof shifts from you to that Corporate entity or to that Legal “person” (someone that has failed to register THAT Legal NAME) to prove that you have NOT been damaged. This form of restitution is known as “Unjust Enrichment” and the burden of proof is on the defendant (in most cases, the corporate United States, labeled ‘Government’) to prove that it did NOT unjustly enrich itself. Remember, only an “entity” may have “standing” in a court. This is why the FIRST thing any judge asks in court is “Please state Your NAME.” Once you “identify” your self as that “Legal NAME you cook your own goose. This is the “voluntary” nature of everything in commerce.
So then, this explains why the Government tells everyone the income tax is “voluntary” because until you properly file that Legal NAME on the COLB with the proper authority known as the SOS, you have no way of proving that you are NOT that Legal NAME. That “presupposition” exists and always will exist because your mother “acted” as an informant by telling the Government she produced a $$ producing “product.” Why are you considered a “product?” Look up “live birth” in Black’s Law or Bouvier’s and you will find the answer to that question. You see, ignorance of the law is no excuse, but if you KNOW the law, you know the “rules” of Their game. Government created the Fictional world of commerce so they made the rules. If you know the rules as I do, your business entity operates in commerce FOR you and you avert any problems with law enforcement. You have stopped “volunteering” to partake in that (unlawful) Fictional world of commerce, and instead, operate lawfully through the use of the ANC and the business entity that YOU created as a means of complying with the law. So now YOU are compliant and almost everyone else is not complying. No wonder everything is upside down and so difficult to figure out, right? I simply figured out the rules and KNOW them better than most people, therefore I win the game everytime I play. I can’t lose. The best analogy I am able to provide is the popular game of ‘Monopoly.” The “United States, Inc.” created the game of “Commerce” and they are providing you with a “game piece” known as a COLB (the Legal NAME). When you “play” the game like you do just about every single day and use that Legal NAME in commerce (yes you do…EVERYONE does), you are violating the “golden rule.” You know, the rule that states Any NAME that is used in commerce MUST be filed with the SOS. B-I-N-G-O. Do you “see” it now? Do you “see” how every one is doing this to themselves by voluntarily stating that Legal NAME is “them?” How can a man or woman be a Legal entity? They can’t which is exactly why the Government can do ANYTHING they wish to you until you comply with that golden rule. You give that judge total discretion to throw you in jail, fine you whatever he or she wishes and you have no say in the matter. Even written laws don’t matter because you have failed to understand that you are “acting” out of line by stating that you are a Fictional entity and of course, court IS commerce. You are pointing a gun at your own head…then pulling the trigger. This is simply an analogy but you get my drift that when we STOP volunteering, we stop partaking in that game of commerce and are able to prove/evidence we are a living man (or woman). How? By presenting the evidence. What evidence? The properly filed ANC demonstrating you are in compliance with the law and your business entity is active and in good standing. Remember, no one is forcing you to admit that the Legal NAME on that COLB is you, you submit to that voluntarily without realizing it.
So now, how do you know who you REALLY are if that “Legal NAME” is NOT you? I will ask you, “where did you come from?” and the answer is of course your mother and father. That would be your “family.” So you came from your family and the “family name,” aka “surname” identifies that family, right? So if that is where you came from, why would you put your “Family name” LAST? That would be ludicrous to put your family last! Family ALWAYS comes first so that is what your signature should reflect; then of course comes your “Given Name” because that is the name your mother and father “gave” to you. The given name is the name you are called and/or “known by” but it still does not “identify” you. Why? Because, a name is just a name…Shakespeare wrote about it in fact; read it here now in Act 2, Scene 2 of Romeo & Juliet.
Shakespeare was a 33rd degree mason and THIS my friends is exactly what freemasonry is all about. Creating an illusion and then putting the truth right under your nose that would expose that illusion to you. It’s right under your nose but you do not “see” it. I am exposing the illusion and in the process, piercing the Corporate veil demonstrating that the “almighty Oz” is just a man with a cape and a pointy hat. I have broken that “curse spell” and made myself free from the bondage of my own doing. That spell has been eternally broken now, all that is left is for you to “act” on it. Your actions are what define and identify you as a good man or a good woman. We all have good in us, our Creator wants us to be good because we all know “God is good.” But for “good” to exist, so must exist the “bad” (evil). Good cop, bad cop. Light and dark. Happiness and sadness. Goodness and badness. Freedom and bondage. Good and evil. God and Satan. Yin and yang.
We are doing this to ourselves. All pain and suffering in the world shall end when we stop partaking in what is causing our ills. Waking up and seeing the light is the beginning of that process. I am simply pointing you in the proper direction, that’s all. The rest is up to YOU.
Peace, Love and Light to every one that reads this, for you are now on the right path.
Herich, Douglas Joseph Chief Executive Officer dba “DOUGLAS JOSEPH HERICH” Business entity ID# 824736000029 Minnesota Secretary of State Filed: 30 April, 2015 firstname.lastname@example.org
“Knowledge is power. Information is liberating.” ~Kofi Annan
Well it has been a long time coming, but all along there have been discussions behind closed doors (never in public) that the Administrative Law Courts established with the New Deal were totally unfounded and unconstitutional. With the anniversary of the Magna Carta and the right to a jury trial coming up on June 15 after 800 years, the era of Roosevelt’s big government is quietly unraveling.
A federal judge’s ruling against the Securities and Exchange Commission for using its own Administrative Law judges in an insider trading case is perhaps the beginning of the end of an alternative system of justice that took root in the New Deal. Constitutionally, the socialists tore everything about the idea of a Democracy apart. It was more than taxing one party to the cheers of another in denial of equal protection. It was about creating administrative agencies (1) delegating them to create rules with the force of law as if passed by Congress sanctioned by the people; (2) the creation of administrative courts that defeated the Tripartite government structure usurping all power into the hand of the executive branch, as if this were a dictatorship run by the great hoard of unelected officials.
Not discussed in the coverage of this story is that the Administrative Law Courts are a fiefdom, to put it mildly. They have long been corrupt and traditionally rule in favor of their agencies, making it very costly for anyone to even try to defend themselves. If someone were to attempt this feat, first they have to wear the costs of an Administration proceeding and appeal to an Article III court judge, then they must appeal to the Court of Appeals, and finally plea to the Supreme Court. The cost of such adventures is well into the millions, and good luck on actually getting justice.
Furthermore, Administrative Law Courts cannot sentence you to prison, but they can fine you into bankruptcy. So the lack of a criminal prosecution meant the judges did not have to be lawyers. They could be anyone’s brother-in-law looking for a job where he just rules in favor of the agency not to be bothered with law. Unless the victim has a pile of money, there is no real chance that he or she can afford to defend themselves. This is why the agencies cut deals with the big houses and prosecute the small upstarts who lack the funds to defend themselves.
In a 45-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May in Atlanta issued an injunction halting Administrative Law proceedings against Charles Hill, a businessman who the SEC accused of reaping an illegal $744,000 profit trading in Radian Systems stock. This is typical. The legal fees involved will exceed the amount of money he is alleged to have made, the typical result is to just pay the fine and they go away, it is cheaper.
The judge ruled that the SEC agency violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution by subjecting Hill to proceedings before an Administrative Law judge, who isn’t directly accountable to the president, officials in charge of the SEC, or the courts under Article III. The ruling is 81 years overdue. The entire structure of administrative agencies blackmailing people has been outrageous. Then you take the banks who just entered a plea of CRIMINALLY guilty to manipulating markets. They are now formally FELONS who engaged in violating SEC rules and thus under the SEC rules, they are no longer eligible for a banking license. The banks are “too big to jail” and the SEC has waived their own rules, of course, to exempt the banks. So they can engage in fraud and manipulation, get caught, pay billions in fines, and the SEC exempts them from losing their licenses. This is how corrupt the administrative agencies really are.
This new decision calling the Administrative Law Courts what they really are is reminiscent of the notorious extrajudicial proceedings of the Star Chamber operated by King James I. The court of Chancery set up outside of the King’s Bench, so there were no trials by jury. It had the same purpose, to circumvent the law. This is where our Bill of Rights Fifth Article came into being. That came about following the trial of John Lilburne (1615-1657) for handing out a pamphlet the government did not like.
The Miranda v Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) decision of the Supreme Court came only after decades of abuse by American police against citizens, not unlike what we are watching today. The Miranda decision is hated by police, prosecutors, right-wing judges, politicians, and citizens. The decision is based upon the history of the right not to be coerced that began with the famous trial of John Lilburn before the English court of the Star Chamber in 1637 where he stood tall and objected to the King’s torture. Lilburn’s crime was handing out pamphlets against the king. John Lilburne (1615–1657) was a leader in the Leveller Movement of the 1640s and was a prolific pamphleteer who defended religious and individual liberty of the people. He was imprisoned many times for his views and was active in the army of the New Parliament rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. In October 1649, he was arrested and tried for High Treason for printing and circulating books and pamphlets critical of the government but was acquitted of all charges by a jury of his peers.
This entry was posted in America’s Current Economy, America’s Economic History, Current Events and tagged Administrative Law Courts, John Lilburne, King James I, Mary Jo White, Miranda Law, SEC,U.S. Constitution by Martin Armstrong. Bookmark the permalink.
Howard A. Graber
“It does not take a majority to prevail… but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.” — Samuel Adams
Note: No legal advice in connection with this message is being given or implied. If you need legal advice you should seek competent counsel. No one in connection with this message acts under any kind of license issued by any government entity. The rights to Free Speech under Article I of the Georgia Constitution are hereby claimed by Howard A. Graber and everything in connection with this communication is for entertainment purposes only.
On Friday, June 12, 2015 6:09 PM, Christopher Chapman email@example.com wrote:
If one was to ever get indicted by the IRS, the question is, can you afford Michael Minns? I hear the cost starting at an everyday low price (Detainer) $245,000.00.
Would you want to prevent from ever getting indicted by shutting down the process before it ever gets started?
ASSET PROTECTION JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER Christopher Chapman WAKE UP AMERICANS 321-264-6383 firstname.lastname@example.org Help us, to help you, to help others to help America
https://twitter.com/Americanliberti American Liberties, LLC, c/o 3080 Finsterwald Drive, Titusville, Florida 32780
Press Release Medicine – designed to trick the gullible By Jenny Thompson
It was splashed all over the web pages of The New York Times, Time magazine, and dozens of other widely-read publications.
Researchers from the University of California in San Francisco claimed they had the smoking-gun proof that a common childhood vaccine can prevent leukemia.
And from there, the pro-vax media ran wild.
But this wasn’t some scientific breakthrough — and the only thing those researchers discovered was how to game the press. Because it looks like they were participating in a dangerous new trend called “Press Release Medicine.”
Press Release Medicine is designed to trick the gullible media into reporting unproven, non-existent benefits of billion-dollar vaccines and drugs.
And in this case, it may have been used to hide the truth about a vaccine that’s not working and could be leaving countless kids at risk for deadly infections.
Separating fact from Fiction
There are two rules to what health watchdogs are increasingly calling Press Release Medicine:
And when UCSF’s Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center put out a press release last month claiming that the Haemophilus Influenzae Type B (Hib) vaccine can reduce a child’s risk of leukemia by 20 percent, they executed the Press Release Medicine strategy to perfection.
Lead scientist Dr. Markus Muschen claimed he and his colleagues discovered the exact mechanism by which the Hib vaccine — which is given to babies and designed to prevent bacterial infections that can cause pneumonia and meningitis — keeps cells from turning cancerous.
Muschen even doubled down and declared that it’s “common knowledge that vaccines protect against cancer and leukemia.”
And that was all it took for major outlets like The New York Times and Time magazine to declare the story true and share it with their readers. These reporters didn’t look into the science behind Muschen’s claims — and, for the most part, they weren’t qualified to.
Before she became an overnight cancer research expert, the Time reporter had been covering Bruce Jenner’s gender change and some controversial quotes from an old Seinfeld character.
And, of course, that’s why Press Release Medicine works so well. There are plenty of lazy and under-qualified reporters and editors who will cover any health news that sounds like it’s coming from a reputable source.
And while many members of the media didn’t ask too many questions about the Hib study, I did.
It turns out this research was on mouse enzymes. Muschen and his colleagues didn’t study a single child — nor was there a single case of leukemia prevented.
Tara Haelle, who writes for NPR (there are still some good reporters out there), started digging into Muschen’s claim that the Hib vaccine was helping kids ward off leukemia. And she couldn’t find a single scientist who agreed.
Haelle interviewed experts from Emory University and the University of California, Berkeley, and they all told her the same thing: “Nothing in this paper proves that the Hib vaccine reduces leukemia risk.”
She even tracked down Dr. Paul Offit, head of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and one of America’s biggest vaccination supporters. Offit refused to claim there’s a connection between the Hib shot and a reduced cancer risk.
So why are pro-vax researchers giving us this deceptive hard sell on the Hib vaccine? Why are they so intent on finding another, different reason for parents to choose it for their kids?
One reason may be that the Hib shot seems to be failing at its primary job — decreasing the number of Hib infections in America. Hib cases have risen just about every year since the mid-1990s, despite that fact that there’s more than a 90 percent vaccination rate.
And that’s no surprise because kids who get the Hib vaccine are up to five times more likely to get Hib illnesses than children who skip the shot. The Hib vaccine apparently suppresses the immune system, which can leave newly vaccinated kids vulnerable to the most serious type of Hib infection — bacterial meningitis.
In fact, as far back as 1995 the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System showed a big uptick in young kids coming down with Hib infections within a month after receiving the vaccine.
That’s a serious risk that should be communicated to parents who are deciding whether the Hib vaccine is right for their kids. Just don’t expect to read about it in some mainstream, pro-vax press release.
“How a claim that a childhood vaccine prevents leukemia went too far” Tara Haelle, May 27, 2015, NPR, npr.org
“UCSF-led study explains how early childhood vaccination reduces leukemia risk” Juliana Bunim, May 18, 2015, UCSF.edu
“How a childhood vaccine reduces risk of a cancer” Nicholas Bakalar, May 20, 2015, The New York Times, well.blogs.nytimes.com
The Truth Behind The USDA’s ‘Non-GMO Label’ Revealed
West New York mayor accepted $250K in bribes in medical kickback scheme.
U.N. Peacekeepers Sexually Abused Hundreds Of Women In Haiti
BREAKING: Officer Resigns After Viral Video Made Him ˜Internet Famous” for Pulling Gun on Kids
The Bilderberg Group: Founded By A Nazi And Continuing The Agenda Of The Nazis
X-Files Radio – June 7, 2015 RFK Assassination
CAUGHT: Obama Advisor Flat-Out Lies On-Air Regarding McKinney Incident
U.S. SCHOOLTEACHERS BOW TO ALLAH, CELEBRATE ISLAM District staffers use taxpayer dime to attend ‘workshop’ at mosque
Sadly, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has such a horrid reputation that in 2015 America with Jade Helm unfolding across the country, the sinister viewpoint taken by Americans on this picture will quite likely rule out over the ‘water rescue training’ viewpoint, and for good reason some might argue considering the history going back to medieval times of such contraptions. From a source who is a retired US Navy SEAL:
“At a much closer look, it’s three different types of hanging methods. One that cuts off circulation of the legs, one that cuts of circulation to the diaphragm and one that is a simple neck hanging. This is tutorial for the different hanging methods! This is a training session!!!!!!!! I would say it’s a joke set up by some bored FEMA guys, but the time it would take to set up all the ropes involved, seems too much work for that.”
~this is your New World Order people. Anyone think we can fix this country through the courts or a ballot box? Didn’t think so.
Making solid bodies from vaporous ghosts
by Jon Rappoport
This piece is about how language is used in the matrix. Here I present notes from a work-in-progress, The Underground:
“Previously, I have established that psychiatry, a government-protected group, exists on the basis of pseudoscience. None of the 300 officially certified mental disorders has a defining laboratory test for diagnosis. Instead, committees of psychiatrists meet and consider clusters of behaviors, group them, and assign labels, which are arbitrary nouns: bipolar, clinical depression, ADHD, and so on. Because people feel they may ‘have these conditions,’ they accept the unproven assertion that they are suffering from ‘a chemical imbalance’ in the brain. By and large, the public resents interference with this faith-based conviction.
“Psychiatric researchers use terms like ‘breakthrough’, ‘possible link’, ‘enormous progress’, ’emerging theory’, all of which are fictional. These words don’t denote authentic science; they are advertisements. Prostitutes trolling for grant money.”
“The government has no legal basis for supporting the pseudoscience called psychiatry. It arbitrarily issues licenses to practice. These licenses merely express a preference for one kind of diagnosis and drugging. With the same degree of legal propriety, licenses could be granted to card readers, astrologists, dowsers, and channelers. However, the government has no legal basis for issuing permission to any group that diagnoses mental states. In this area, the word ‘license’ is a fraud.”
“Currently, the federal government, through its trade representatives, is negotiating a secret 12-nation treaty called the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Since the US Congress must vote in favor of the TPP in order for it to pass, the term ‘secret treaty’ is a self-contradiction. Congress does not legally vote on measures whose contents are secret. Staging such a vote is a crime. All Representatives and Senators who participate are acting outside their defined duties and responsibilities and are committing a major felony. Citizens have no obligation to accept the vote or the legitimacy of those who cast a vote.”
“The notion that government can invent a term, fail to define it clearly, and yet use it to adopt and legally enforce draconian measures, is a promoted illusion. Unfortunately, most people accept the illusion. Take the term “National Security.” Its definition is sufficiently vague to render it useless. Yet government invokes it every day and acts on it. Refusing to clarify it in any given situation, and refusing to justify its use automatically takes government out of the realm of ‘Republic’ or even ‘Democracy’, and into the realm of Autocracy.”
“Case law, precedent, and the Constitution rely on language, and language relies on definition of terms. However, lawyers (in and out of government) depend on vague terms, in order to make their living. They can argue about meanings, change meanings, ‘update’ meanings, in an endless debate billed at hourly wages.”
“A proper characterization of government work would sound something like this: ‘A US Senator, John Smith, acting outside his Constitutional description and therefore surrendering his role as a legitimate elected representative, cast an illegal vote for a Treaty whose language has yet to be fully revealed, because “National Security,” a term vague enough to be useless, has been invoked to maintain the secret contents of the Treaty which is, owing to its secrecy, no Treaty at all. Senator Smith could seek psychiatric help for his “condition”. However, no defining scientific test exists for any so-called psychiatric disorder, all such disorders being invented fictions utilizing non-scientific terms.'”
“We all use terms which are pure illusions, vague enough to be useless, or self-contradictory. We could, on occasion, preface these terms with an “f”, to denote “fiction” and remind ourselves who and what we’re dealing with. For example: ‘Citing fNational Security, fCongressman John Smith explained why he couldn’t discuss the terms of the fTPP in public. fPresident Obama defended his need for fFast Track Authority, stating that famendments to the fTreaty would stall and disrupt fnegotiations.”
“Notice that many fictional terms turn out to be nouns. This is no accident. Nouns denote people, places, and things. The invention (or gross distortion) of people, places, and things serves the function of expanding the number of signposts populating the map of consensus reality. Thus, ‘writing an endless work of fiction’ becomes ‘describing what exists’.
“There is a range of diseases whose names are fictions, because no known cause has been identified. Parkinson’s, for instance, is said to have several types. Idiopathic, meaning the cause is not known, and secondary, which is usually ascribed to the effects of various toxins. The secondary form should be called ‘poisoning’, which is not a disease. The former world heavyweight boxing champion, Muhammad Ali, has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s, whereas his condition should be labeled: ‘hit too many times by Joe Frazier’.”
“If you look up the official definition of autism, you’ll see there is no definitive test that diagnoses it. Instead, there is a menu of behaviors. Therefore, how can the US government claim there is no causative connection between vaccines and autism? Parents seeking government compensation after their children have been damaged by vaccination (happy child withdraws from the world, doesn’t speak, etc.) are in a quandary. If they claim their children have ‘autism’, the government will refuse payment. If, however, the parents claim their children have ‘encephalopathy’, which is a more general (and uselessly vague) term for ‘brain disease’, the parents stand a chance of compensation. All this word manipulation is a cover to obscure the fact that children are severely damaged by vaccines—and that’s what the label should be: ‘damaged by vaccination’. It’s simple, it’s accurate, it’s an unmistakable characterization.”
“The father of General Semantics, Alfred Korzybski, stated that humans have the unique ability of ‘time-binding’. By that he meant the capacity to pass down, to future generations, gained knowledge, and also to generate higher and higher levels of abstraction. Additionally, Korzybski famously pointed out a chronic misunderstanding: “The map is not the territory.” In other words, a series of connected symbols referring to objects or processes in the physical world is not the same thing as those objects and processes. Add to that the following: untold numbers of fictional terms represented as fact are transmitted from one generation of humans to another. The overall result? A titanic piling up of inherited language falsely pretending to describe reality. That language forms a networked perception which is entirely misguided.”