By: Judge Anna von Retiz

Picture 36

So What Does All This Mean?

It means we have been defrauded by international banking cartels operating “governmental services corporations” as if these entities were our lawful government. It means that the Holy See and the British Monarch have acted in secretive Breach of Trust and Dishonor and have undermined our rightful government since 1845. It means that we have caught the rats red-handed, proved the facts, and demanded remedy.

FRANCISCUS, the dba name of the Pope, issued his Motu Proprio and made the members of the Bar Associations responsible for their errors and omissions. This effectively washed his hands of the criminality of the Bar Members and the continuing assaults upon us by the British Crown and ended their privateer licenses and other protections that had been extended to them in Breach of Trust.

So far, so good.

However, there has been no action to dismantle the mechanisms of the fraud that has been practiced against the living people. Every day, babies are born in hospitals and are “registered” as chattel belonging to privately owned and operated corporations masquerading as our government. These corporations patent and trademark our bodies and our names and create “citizens” for themselves that they ultimately control as slaves. This practice of “enslavement by proxy” is no less repugnant than physical enslavement and it has the same results.

They have accomplished this by obtaining undisclosed contracts under conditions of coercion and misrepresentation and by blatant fraud upon the probate courts and falsification of the civil records. They have had each one of us declared “legally dead”—- “Missing, presumed lost at sea”—and have seized upon our estates as presumed secondary beneficiaries. This legal chicanery has been assisted and expedited by a few evil politicians who literally conspired to sell their countrymen into slavery for profit.

They seize upon our property by presuming that it is “abandoned”. This is what has happened to every so-called “mortgage payment” you have ever made. It has been seized by the banks as abandoned property belonging to your own estate. They take title to our land, homes, businesses, and other private property and public property interests under color of law. They disguise installment leases as “land sales”. They disguise repurchase agreements as “loans”. They disguise “security notes” as “promissory notes”. And they steal us blind, taking their pay out of our treasury and otherwise using and abusing our own assets to do it.

Just as they have seized upon our private property via a process of fraud and deceit, they have attempted to seize upon our entire nation and claim that it is “abandoned property”.

To understand how this works you have to understand the first frauds committed against us, for it is in the beginning that we most clearly see the ends.

  1. March 27, 1861, the actual elected Congress ceases to function.
  1. Lincoln creates a corporation doing business as “The United States of America” and uses what is left of the Congress as a Board of Directors.
  1. This “Corporate Congress” changes the meaning of the word “person” to mean “corporation” for their own private in-house corporate purposes. (37th Congress, Second Session, Chapter 49, Section 68).
  1. The Corporate Congress changes the meaning of more words— according to them, the meaning of the words “state”, “State” and “United States” all magically mean ““the territories and the District of Columbia” (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.)
  1. These “special definitions” adopted by “a” Congress operating a private, for-profit corporation doing business as “The United States of America” then secretly allowed the rats to “presume” that anyone who used the common meaning of these words and admitted to living in a “state” or the “United States” was submitting to be considered and treated as a “citizen” of the District of Columbia, instead. In their secretively altered lexicon, “United States Citizen = District of Columbia Citizen”
  1. And as anyone reading The Constitution can see, this meant submitting to the rule of “Congress” which was given plenary control of the District of Columbia. Via the use of semantic deceit a small group of venal criminals “redefined” our Republic as a plenary oligarchy run by none other than themselves. They also endeavored to redefine all the freeborn Americans as slaves belonging to the District of Columbia. Never mind that the “Congress” engaging in this fraud and merely pretending to be the lawfully elected Congress had absolutely no public office and no delegated authority.
  1. What happened with all this fraud by a hundred years later? The Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646 – “A ‘citizen of the United States is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.”

Now, put all this together in one big Ball of Wax, and what do you get?

The Bar Association Members employed by the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation have been “presuming” that you are “civilly dead” because you have been falsely reported as “missing, presumed dead” on the records of their probate courts. While they have been busily and secretively “presuming” this, they have also been “presuming” that you died intestate (without a Will) and that the local District of Columbia Municipal Corporation franchise doing business as (for example) the STATE OF OKLAHOMA, is the beneficiary of all your property.

How’s that for a fraud racket? How’s that for conflict of interest?

But they didn’t stop there. They also presume that the still living man is a “co-trustee” and “co-beneficiary” of his own estate trust. How can that be? Obviously, he can’t be the trustee AND the beneficiary of his own estate at the same time, because the two roles are mutually exclusive.

So they send out a false summons to you as the “presumed” co-trustee of the JOHN QUINCY ADAMS estate trust, and you, ignorantly assuming that this is your name and that this mail is addressed to you, show up in answer to their “summons”—- and they trick you into playing the role of trustee, while they suck up the beneficiary slot and milk your estate.

That is what these demons in suits have been playing at all these years. They charge your estate millions of dollars for every “felony” charge they utter and nearly as much for every “misdemeanor”. Then for good measure, they throw you in jail and make the taxpayers pay a hundred times more than any real cost for the “service” of incarcerating you—-and profiting off your labor in “prison industries”. They bilk billions of dollars out of the public treasury and out of your private “abandoned” estates every year, while parading around the town as members of “elite” society.

No doubt the word “elite” has also been redefined by these maggots to mean “common criminal”.

There is no doubt now that this system is what it is, nor is there any doubt that it must end, but before we leave this subject, please note, that they haven’t been content with defrauding, press-ganging, enslaving, and taxing you under false pretenses, oh, no, they finally maxed out your credit cards which they stole along with your identity as a living breathing man.

So the Big Game has been afoot: do the same thing we did to each one of the people to the entire nation.

How do we do that?

November 7, 2007 the rats in Washington, DC running the “United States, Inc.” bankrupted it for the third and final time. They handed it over to the UN to act as bankruptcy trustee and nobody named a successor to The Constitution contract.

That left the “Federal” side of the Constitution contract flapping in the wind, and the United Nations Trust Committee — North America overseeing our National Trust assets, and no other entity named to provide the nineteen enumerated services that the British-controlled Federal United States is supposed to provide.


Last week, the infernal bastards filed a claim on abandonment against our entire nation, claiming that we no longer exist as a sovereign nation because we haven’t been heard from in 150 years. They further claimed that we are no longer a sovereign nation because we (allegedly) don’t have a national currency in circulation.

We had to file a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty and two new sets of Sovereign Letters Patent to rebut their unending “presumptions” before the UN Trust Committee- North America and the UN Security Council.

The fact is that we are sovereigns in joint tenancy; if we don’t attend to our business in a hundred years, it’s still our business. If we don’t call a Continental Convention in 200 years, that’s our business, too. And we are not obligated to have a national currency in circulation—even though we do.

It’s the same schtick they are trying to pull only on a much larger scale— claiming that our whole nation is effectively “missing, presumed lost” and that our estate is “abandoned” ready for the taking by secondary beneficiaries and creditors.

That’s what the banks and their buddies the lawyers and their flunkies the politicians you elected in good faith had planned for you.

That’s what Wells Fargo Bank—- which is not a bank—-it’s a “securities investment corporation” using the trademarked name “Wells Fargo Bank” to pretend that its a bank—has been trying to promote this past week. And no wonder. It is partially owned and operated by the “US Attorney General”.

And now, let’s make it Perfectly Clear—- General Dunsford, you are responsible for providing for the security of the American People. You receive your paycheck directly or indirectly from funds and credit obtained from us—even if it is now in the hands of pirates and brigands and those who have colluded with them as false trustees. These evil men and women would like to start a Civil War in America, because they make their money off of conflict.

In preparation for trying to incite an uprising among the peaceful American people these criminals have armed corporate subcontractors that are operating under names designed to make people assume they are lawful units of government—- BATF, FEMA, IRS, DHS, FBI, CIA, local “Sheriffs” who are nothing but shills working in private corporate offices, not Sheriffs occupying public offices on the land at all —- and have armed these private commercial mercenaries with billions of rounds of ammunition and tactical weapons. For what purpose?

So that the secondary creditors of a bankruptcy that we were never legitimately any part of —international banking cartels and foreign investors—can come in here and loot and pillage America with the assistance of commercial mercenaries bought and paid for with illegal taxes extorted from Americans by criminals pretending to be our lawful government.

This circumstance and the UN’s role in it is now well-known on a worldwide basis and is well-documented and proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

What are we going to do about it? For starters, we notified the UN Trustees that we are very much alive and in charge of our own affairs and that we have been victims of crime and misrepresentation. We are not “U.S. Citizens” of any kind according to their definitions—nor ours. We are Americans. We, and our property assets both public and private, have been entrapped in the private corporate bankruptcies of these bank owned and operated “governmental services corporations” without our knowledge or consent, and we object to any presumption that we are now or ever were civilly dead, incompetent, bankrupt, or otherwise dependent on these villainous fictitious entities.

That is a good and practical start.



Picture 35.png

November 12, 2015

The Joint Chiefs of Staff
General Dunford, Chief of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999

Dear General Dunford and Members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

Today, it is our sad duty to reiterate the facts. Our nation has been all but overrun by British-backed inland pirates making “war” upon innocent civilian non-combatants who are owed the Good Faith and Service of both the British Monarch who is supposed to act as our Trustee on the “High Seas and Inland Waterways” and the City-State of Westminster aka Inner City of London, which promised us “amity in perpetuity” under the Treaty of Westminster 1794.

These Breaches of Trust and Treaty by declared “friends and allies” and the criminality involved in their secretive execution of agreements revealed by the Secret Treaty of Verona (1845) led to the issuance of private privateer’s “licenses” to Bar Association Members including Members of the American Bar Association.

It should also be clear that the resulting theft of our resources and labor and the abuse of our Armed Forces has occurred on the watch of your predecessors, all of whom have taken their paychecks from our treasury while turning a blind eye to the corruption in which they have participated and benefited from.

The jig, Sirs, is up.

Your duty is clearly to the American People and failure to perform will not be excused.

The false legal proceedings which have allowed the criminals responsible to redefine freeborn Americans as debt slaves belonging to the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and to falsify the probate court records is now fully exposed and has been published worldwide. Similar mechanisms of fraud simulating legal process have been employed throughout Great Britain, the Commonwealth, Western Europe, and Japan.

A popular press article entitled “So What Does All This Mean?” elucidating the legal fraud mechanism and documenting the way in which it was put in place is attached. An original wet-ink signed copy of the referenced “Declaration of Joint Sovereignty” and “Sovereign Letters Patent” submitted to the UN Trust Committee-North America and to the UN Security Council is attached, as is an original wet-ink signed copy of our published, printed, and bound affidavit of probable cause, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…An American Affidavit of Probable Cause.”

Your offices are already in receipt of the General Civil Orders issued by the American People acting under the Last Man Standing Rule of our Lawful Constitution.

Your duty and the duty of the International Trustees to protect us and to protect our assets both public and private has been clearly enunciated along with our intention to live our lives in peace and our determination to stop this criminality in its tracks.

It’s our credit that has been abused to pay your salaries and buy your “toys” and it is our sons and daughters who fill your ranks and give your offices meaning. You will obey us and you will perform your duty to protect our currency and protect our national trust or we will fire you and hire someone else.

We are the lawful beneficiaries and inheritors of the American National Trust(s) and we are speaking in that capacity as Beneficiaries making demand upon the Trustees to act in our favor and according to our direct instructions.

No presumption that any incorporated entity other than our long-established States of America “represents” us may be maintained and no claim presented by any Member of the American Bar Association may be deemed credible. These con men have been waging a form of commercial war against innocent Third Parties, entrapping and entangling innocent non-combatant civilians in their private abusive bankruptcies.

Not all lawyers and bankers are bad people and many have participated unknowingly in this rape and pillaging of America. Those that have known and have willfully participated in these nefarious acts have operated as Undeclared Foreign Agents and have committed capital crimes including press-ganging, inland piracy, conspiracy against The Constitution, and unlawful conversion of National Trust assets. They are Public Enemies of the highest order, as they have abused positions of Public Trust in order to carry out their actions. They have also committed numerous lesser crimes including personage, barratry, impersonating elected officials, simulating legal process, reverse and secondary trust fraud, fraud by semantic deceit, and constructive fraud.

If your Oath means anything to you, if your country means anything to you, these crimes and those committing them must be brought to a stop. This continuing criminality is our Number One National Security issue.


_______________________Anna Maria Riezinger, all rights reserved. _______________________James Clinton Belcher, all rights reserved.

Contact: c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska RFD 99652 and as previously shared. Enclosed: Wet-ink bound copy of affidavit of probable cause, wet-ink copy of Declaration of Joint Sovereignty and Sovereign Letters Patent, copy of editorial, “So What Does All This Mean?”

===Field McConnell Reported Kristine Marcy Treasons and Barry Soetoro(*)===

Letter to General Joseph Dunford – Treason Against the United States – 18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of Treason – Government Drug Running – USMC Col. James Sabow’s Assassination – US Military Members Are Being Threatened

Field McConnell
USMC 0116513
P O Box 9
Plum City WI 54761

General Joseph Dunford, CMC

CC Governor Scott Walker, WI
Ben Carson, MD
Donald Trump

29 July, 2015


We are aware of an ongoing Treason against the United States of America. It threatens members of the United States Military.

We are also aware that on 22 January, 1991, Colonel James Sabow USMC, was murdered on orders of two politicians and one four star general.

As you three gentlemen anticipate your next position, I wish to be contacted by any one of you willing to participate in the remedy for the Treason and a serious investigation of the murder of Colonel Sabow. Further, it is wise to consider definition of item below.

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Field McConnell =============== 94 Page Document to Following=========

Douglas La Follette Wisconsin Secretary of State P O Box 7848 Madison, WI 53707-7848 and John Koskinen (IRS), Richard G. Chandler (WI Revenue), Judge Rosemary M Collyer (Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) Judge who dismissed the BUAP lawsuit, Sheriff David A. Clarke, Jr (Milwaukee Co. WI), Dallas S. Neville (U S Marshal, WI), Kevin Carr (U S Marshal, WI), Adan Y. BenZikri (WI Revenue), Nancy Hove (Pierce Co. WI Sheriff), Judge Dennis D. O’Brien (MN BR Judge who presided on a Fraud BR on 27 May, 2003), Jon Brakke (Fargo Atty in Fraud BR May 2003), Kermit E. Bye (Court of Appeals Judge who told me Vogel Law had “all the bases covered”)

Senators Johnson WI and Grassley IA who claim to be concerned with Whistle Blowers may want to pay attention to the Treason and Felony WRONGFUL DEATH charges I delivered them on 4 August, 2015.

USPS Track for Gen Dunford copy: 9505 5112 1387 5216 5311 14



For both of our safety, and to discourage criminal Charter Abuse of authority, a video recording of this stop is being made.

  • I have stopped as required, because of your Emergency Lights and Sirens.
  • I have a Question: “What is the Emergency, Officer???”
  • If this is not an Emergency, by right; May I please have your Governmental Charter Identity Information; your name, badge number and charterer’s number???
  • After my initial Questions: I have been advised NOT TO SPEAK any further to the Governmental “Corporate or Chartered” Code Enforcement personnel under any circumstances.
  • As I have revoked all Transportation Charters dealing with being classified as a Governmental Chartered DRIVER for commercial Hire or Profit and I am therefore not under the CHARTERER’S CODES OF LAW:
    I hereby assert and exercise my Constitutional Protected Rights to Remain Silent and Freedom of Safe Harbor and Travel.
  • Unless this is an actual Emergency, after 15 minutes (your time to read this document): Any further Delay is to be classified as a Constitutional unlawful “Bill of Detainer” (Arrest) and my Charges will be filed for your theft of my Time, as time is money.

The COURTS have handed down RULINGS that support my Rights not to Charter and my Rights to be compensated for harm caused by Chartered Organizations.

  • Probable Cause or Consent is required to Conduct a SEARCH and any further DETENTION.
  • Since this is a suspicion-less Stop or Checkpoint, in which No Harm or Damage is involved, you do not have any Probable Cause to Search or Detention, me or my private property.
  • The sole permitted purpose of referral to secondary inspection is for “brief questioning of Identity.”
  • No other lawful basis remains for a referral to secondary inspection.

If you conduct any Unlawful Search, Detention, or Other Violation of my Rights (all of which I reserve), I intend to see that Criminal Charges are filed and Action of Trespass instituted against you and your Charterer Corporation, to the greatest extent permitted by Law.






Percy the pig

Picture 33.png

      Every Muslim who has ever handled TNT, Nitro, Bullets, High Explosive Bombs, Rocket Launchers or been treated for cuts injury requiring stitches, or taken antibiotics, or Vitamin Capsules, has been contaminated with Pig Products.

     The ironical part is that when a Suicide Bomber blows himself up his body parts are impregnated with Gelatine and Glycerine from the explosive. Both Gelatine and Glycerine are manufactured from Pigs worldwide.. Ergo, they will never be accepted by Allah.

      Some makers of cigarettes use haemoglobin from pig’s blood in their filters. Apparently this element works as a sort of ‘artificial lung’ in the cigarette so, they claim, ‘harmful reactions take place before the chemicals reach the user’, (enter the Pig.)

      Pig bone gelatine is used to help transport gunpowder or cordite into the bullet. Insulin, the blood-thinning drug heparin and pig heart valves all vital. The complex workings of the global food and processing industry have ensured that it is impossible to avoid pig altogether.

     Pig product goes into liquorice and many other products. In this process, collagen is taken from the pig and is then converted into gelatine. This finds its way into numerous foodstuffs, where it acts as a gelling agent.

     A number of medicines also contain pig gelatine – everything from painkillers to multivitamins. Fatty acids extracted from the bone fat of pigs are used in shampoos and conditioners to give them their shiny, pearl-like appearance. These acids can also be found in a number of body lotions, foundations and anti-wrinkle creams. Glycerine made from pork fat is an ingredient in many types of toothpaste.

     There is no legal obligation for manufacturers to specify whether the gelatine they use is from a pig or another animal. When it is specified, it is often confusingly referred to as Suilline gelatine.

     So to all prospective Suicide Bombers, ISIS and innocent, good Muslims, I say, Have a Nice Day from Percy the wonderful Pig.

Leonce Kealy

Honorable Member of the

Electors’ Parliaments of Australia

6 Eskdale Street

Edens Landing


Ph: 61738073827 Cell: 0419643489


Link to my Book:

Also read daily: http://www/

Shooters Join:

Hawaiian Natives Move One Step Closer To Declaring Sovereignty From U.S. Government

By Carey Wedler

This week, Native Hawaiians initiated an historical election that may grant them sovereignty from the United States and the state of Hawaii, itself, after well over a century of colonial rule. More than 95,000 indigenous people will elect delegates to a constitutional convention, scheduled for this winter, when they will work to create a government that serves and represents Native Hawaiians — the only group of indigenous people in the United States currently restricted from forming their own government.

In the 19th century, European and American missionaries and traders began settling in Hawaii. They quickly formed a political movement and succeeded in transferring power from the king to his cabinet and the legislature. Though they drafted a new constitution limiting the king’s control, they also limited the voting rights of Asians and Native Hawaiians while granting that right to wealthy non-citizens.

When the king died and his sister, Queen Liliuokalani, assumed the throne, she attempted to restore power to the monarchy and return voting rights to those who had been excluded by the white settlers. White businessmen disapproved of her intentions and formed the Committee of Safety, which sought to overthrow the Queen and have Hawaii annexed by the United States. On January 16, 1893, backed by a  militia and 162 U.S. marines, the Committee achieved its goal. The Queen surrendered, and in 1898, Hawaii was annexed by the United States.

The federal government apologized in 1993 for its colonization of the island and its natives, but that failed to improve conditions for many indigenous people. According to a government report, Native Hawaiians suffer higher rates of poverty and unemployment than the rest of the population and are underrepresented in business ownership and education. Further, Native Hawaiians “are the racial group with the highest proportion of risk factors leading to illness, disability, and premature death” — a problem compounded by a lack of access to healthcare.

These stark conditions, as well as the state’s imperial history, have led many Native Hawaiians to seek sovereignty from the United States government.

In 2011, Hawaii passed a law to recognize Native Hawaiians as the first people of Hawaii. That bill also established the Native Hawaiian Roll Commission to “assemble a list of qualified and interested Native Hawaiian voters” — a move that gave infrastructure to the current push for self-determination.

Last month, U.S. District Court Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled to allow the vote, which will not be administered by the state. The month-long election will select 40 delegates to attend a constitutional convention in February. Though delegates will not be elected to any public office, they will be instrumental in deciding how Native Hawaiians will rule themselves. At the eight-week convention scheduled for February, the elected delegates will decide whether or not they want to create a new Native Hawaiian government. If a Native government is formed, delegates will alsodecide whether to establish a “government-to-government” relationship with the U.S. or seek total independence.

One of the members of the commission, Native Hawaiian Robin Danner, expressed optimism for the new vote:

For the first time in over a hundred years, there will be a definitive voice on Native Hawaiian issues,” she said. “A definitive and recognized government to speak for our culture, our people, our issues, instead of county or state government attempting to have a subcommittee within their agencies or structures to mouthpiece the value of native viewpoints, which has not worked well at all.”

However, the process has not been without opposition. In August, two non-native Hawaiians (sponsored by Judicial Watch) sued to stop the vote, claiming it was racially discriminatory — and therefore unconstitutional — because only Native Hawaiians would be allowed to participate. Two Native Hawaiians also joined the suit to protest that their names were added to voter rolls without their consent. Then, two additional Native Hawaiians joined to voice general opposition to the proposed process of attaining self-determination.

Kellii Akina, one of the plaintiffs, said it was “wrong for the state government to use public resources in order to promote a racially discriminatory process.” She added, “What’s really at stake here is not only the constitution of the United States but also the aloha spirit.”

Nevertheless, the case resulted in Judge Seabright’s decision last month to allow the vote. Judicial Watch has since filed an injunction in an attempt to halt the election.

Criticism also came from an unlikely corner: Walter Ritte, a delegate candidate who dropped out of the race last Wednesday, expressed the concerns of many Natives that the government is too involved in the process. For example, though the election is administered privately, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs provided $2.6 million to fund it — evoking protests from plaintiffs in the August suit. Further, the Native Hawaiian Roll Commission, which has played an instrumental role in the push for the vote, is after all, a government entity.

Witte argued the proposed path to sovereignty would simply facilitate “continuation of the U.S. goal to illegally occupy the Hawaiian Islands.”

“If you’re going to plant a seed that is not pono [righteous],”  he said, “then you’re going to harvest something that is not pono.” He called the election “a fake pathway to nationhood and its disillusioned vision of sovereignty,” encouraging voters to remove themselves from the rolls.

Independent nonprofit Na’i Aupuni, which has campaigned in favor of the vote, quickly responded to Ritte’s criticisms that the proposed path to sovereignty was counterproductive:

“Na’i Aupuni encourages Native Hawaiians to voice their opinion on the Na`i Aupuni process because the voters and delegate candidates should hear all voices.

“However, the fact that some Native Hawaiians protest because they are concerned that their desired outcome will not be accepted emphasizes the need for a Native Hawaiian convention. Without a process to vote in leaders who can advocate among each other to find a consensus, the Native Hawaiian community will never proceed forward in unity,” a statement read.

As Danner, who works for the government-created commission, expressed, “Being native in the United States is like living a cycle of grief. Because being native in the United States is to have lost something powerful. First, you’re depressed. Then you’re angry. Then there is some acceptance and then you get to a point where you say, ‘What am I going to do about it?’ As a people I think we are at the stage where we are ready to do something about it.”

These divisions highlight a common conflict in American political life that echoes the “lesser of two evils” dilemma: should Hawaiians wait for a purer movement devoid of government influence to seek sovereignty, delaying the process and extending the suppression of their right to form a government? Or should they seize the state-sponsored opportunity they have been offered for the sake of expediency and resolution?

Assuming Judicial Watch’s appeal fails and the vote continues, it appears Hawaiians are one step closer to determining their fate — whether they like it or not.

Karen Hudes and “The Rule of Law”

Published November 10

This is November 9, 2015. For those who don’t know, I had a major league donnybrook right here on Facebook with Karen Hudes two years ago in July. I told her that we, the living American people, are the primary creditors, that the gold her banker bosses received as their part of the 1933 bankruptcy fraud belongs to the American people.

She didn’t like it, but World Bank and IBRD are in the same position as a Pawn Shop Broker in knowing receipt of stolen goods—-she and they are just fudging around for a means to give it back to the people they schemed to defraud without admitting to the crime. Their primary concern is to avoid criminal convictions and public dishonor.

Well, too bad. Better not to practice to deceive and manipulate and defraud people in the first place, no?

It is what it is—- blatant as a manure pile behind a barn. The Big Picture of the fraud that has been practiced against us is becoming clearer and more damning by the minute, so of course, everyone concerned is claiming “immunity” and trying to cover their rumps with whatever fig leaves they can find.

Now Karen is claiming that it is precisely this need for immunity that is two-blocking remedy. The rats are copping a plea bargain, in other words, but they aren’t finding anyone with both the authority and the willingness to absolve them.

Indeed, the disclosure of MORE deliberate long term fraud on the part of those fronting the “United States, Inc.” has left the entire Federal Court System on its back, all four legs in the air and twitching.

Those who read our affidavit, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” (available on Amazon), already learned how the “Corporate Congress” conspired to change the meaning of a crucial word— the word “person” to mean “corporation”. Researchers in the Lufkin Case discovered another Motherlode of evidence involving more deliberate corporate semantic deceit and fraud. (Southern District of Texas, Houston Division No. 4:14-CV-0027 and Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division No. 9:14-CV-138 —the “Lufkin Case”).

I am not sure who to credit for this snippet of case analysis, so will just point out that the next three paragraphs are quotes from a discussion of the case and they present the source of an absolutely crucial bit of information:

In Congress on June 30, 1864 (described in detail in both the Houston and Lufkin Record):

On that date, Congress quietly decreed that the word “state” (and shortly thereafter “State” and “United States”) means “the territories and the District of Columbia” (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864 [Go to “Turn to image” 306])—but ultimately translates to the District of Columbia only and excludes by design all commonwealths united by and under authority of the Constitution and admitted into the Union .

Since June 30, 1864, any Joint Tenant in the Sovereignty (you) who innocently believes or admits that he resides in a state, State, or the United States, unwittingly confesses or concedes that he is a resident of the District of Columbia—and subject to the absolute, exclusive legislative power of Congress and jurisdiction of District of Columbia executive and bench officers (Department of Justice attorneys and United States District Judges and Magistrates).”

The upshot of all this is that no “US District Court” has jurisdiction outside the actual District of Columbia. And never did. And, by corollary, if the “federal courts” at the district level are limited in this way, so are the “federal state” courts and “federal county” courts. It is just a matter of time before the entire “federal” court system is recognized as a crime syndicate and liquidated.

All the millions of people jailed over income taxes? All the millions foreclosed upon? All those who have been kidnapped and kept under false arrest for “victimless crimes”? All those who have lost custody of their children? All the billions upon billions of dollars charged each year against our public purse to keep innocent Americans incarcerated?

And it is all based on semantic deceit fraud that began in 1864…..

The “Judges” and “Attorneys” who have used this venal system to protect the perpetrators are now under pressure themselves. All their secrets are being dug out of that giant manure pile mentioned earlier and not only do they and their buddies the bankers NOT have immunity, their friends in Congress are going to be held accountable, too.

What does all this have to do with my beef with Karen Hudes?

It’s simply this—- these banks and the Bar Associations—- ALL of them worldwide—-are at the bottom of the dogpile, the root cause of all the destruction, theft, criminality, and misery we and many other nations have suffered for over a hundred years. The Congress has functioned as their handmaiden and the Vatican has been their concubine. Now the jig is up and the facts are rolling in like ocean breakers.

Those who have had no mercy on any of us, are now demanding mercy, exoneration, and a Get Out Of Jail Free Card.

These people have a million excuses for their behavior: they didn’t know, the dog ate it, it was necessary for the war effort…. They stand around like cows waggling their ears at us, uh, gee, Boss, I don’t know anything about the manure pile out back….

Generations of Congressional Delegations have sold Americans into slavery—literally— then come home and smiled and led the Fourth of July Parade.

Generations of bankers have advertised “personal” bank accounts under false pretenses, advertised “home loans” that don’t exist, land “sales” that don’t exist, “securities” that don’t exist.

Generations of lawyers have defended and perpetuated and profited from all this abusive bunko and all the while, claimed to be among the educated and elite members of our society, responsible for maintaining “The Rule of Law.”

How can anyone in their right mind look at what has gone on here and still babble about “the rule of law”?

Karen Hudes is now advocating “The Rule of Law” and claiming that failure to maintain “The Rule of Law” will land us back “in the Dark Ages”.

Where in Heaven’s name does she think we have been?

Americans have clearly and forever stated that we don’t live under “The Rule of Law”. We live under the Rule of the People—of the people, by the people, and for people. Someone–seriously– needs to inform Ms. Hudes of this fact.

Nurse suing nursing school for expecting her to lie to parents about vaccines

Student Who Refused to Lie About Vaccines and was Kicked out of Nursing School Fights Back with Lawsuit

Nichole-BruffExcerpt: “Some hospitals require expecting moms and dads to be vaccinated with TDaP before walking into the labor and delivery floor.  My response was ‘This is a worse case scenario, but vaccinating on the floor doesn’t provide antibodies to pertussis for 6 weeks to 6 months and sometimes not even at all.’ I asked how they could promote this when they were giving these families a false sense of security.”

First They Jailed The Bankers, Now Every Icelander To Get Paid In Bank Sale

IcelandSyriaOCTOBER 29, 2015                                                                                                             By Claire Bernish

First, Iceland jailed its crooked bankers for their direct involvement in the financial crisis of 2008. Now, every Icelander will receive a payout for the sale of one of its three largest banks, Íslandsbanki.

If Finance Minister Bjarni Benediktsson has his way — and he likely will — Icelanders will be paid kr 30,000 after the government takes over ownership of the bank. Íslandsbanki would be second of the three largest banks under State proprietorship.

“I am saying that the government take some decided portion, 5%, and simply hand it over to the people of this country,” he stated.

Because Icelanders took control of their government, they effectively own the banks. Benediktsson believes this will bring foreign capital into the country and ultimately fuel the economy — which, incidentally, remains the only European nation to recover fully from the 2008 crisis. Iceland even managed to pay its outstanding debt to the IMF in full — in advance of the due date.

Guðlaugur Þór Þórðarson, Budget Committee vice chairperson, explained the move would facilitate the lifting of capital controls, though he wasn’t convinced State ownership would be the ideal solution. Former Finance Minister Steingrímur J. Sigfússon sided with Þórðarson, telling a radio show, “we shouldn’t lose the banks to the hands of fools” and that Iceland would benefit from a shift in focus to separate “commercial banking from investment banking.”

Plans haven’t yet been firmly set for when the takeover and subsequent payments to every person in the country will occur, but Iceland’s revolutionary approach to dealing with the international financial meltdown of 2008 certainly deserves every bit of the attention it’s garnered.

Iceland recently jailed its 26th banker — with 74 years of prison time amongst them — for causing the financial chaos. Meanwhile, U.S. banking criminals were rewarded for their fraud and market manipulation with an enormous bailout at the taxpayer’s expense.


Up until 1943 the primary law book in the law universities was the bible.

2007                                                                                                                                Dean of the Harvard Law School:

“When you haven’t changed your curriculum in 150 years, at some point you look around,” said Elena Kagan, the dean of Harvard Law.

The impetus for the changes is the sense that what has been taught and how it has been taught may be “embarrassingly disconnected from what anybody does,” Ms. Kagan said.

The New York Times, Training Law Students for Real-Life Careers, October 31, 2007.

Dean of Vanderbilt University Law School: “Often people defend the traditional curriculum by saying that we are teaching them to think like a lawyer. . . I say we are teaching them to think like an 1870s lawyer.” ABA Journal: The Lawyer’s Magazine, Re-engineering the J.D., July 2007, p. 45.

2000                                                                                                                                Professor Crane: “Typically, the law professor will teach the entire course by leading a discussion about the material after students have prepared briefs of cases and short problems that convey information about the material—and the learning of it—in a piecemeal fashion. At the end of the semester, the professor has an expectation that the student will have mastered all of the material well enough to be able to understand the entire subject in a comprehensive way, even though that is not the way the material was taught. Nevertheless, that is the way the class material is most often tested and how student proficiency is assessed…. This creates a dichotomy that leads to charges of incoherence, arbitrariness and subjectivity.” Linda R. Crane, Grading Law School Exams: Making a Case for Objective Exams to Cure What Ails “Objectified” Exams, 34 New Eng. L. Rev. 785 (2000).

Practioner: “[E]ven if new law professors were prone to adopt a different method, many may resist for fear that the deviation may come back to haunt them in their quest for tenure.” David D. Garner, The Continuing Vitality of the Case Method in the Twenty-First Century, 2000 BYU Educ. & L. J. 307, 339 (2000) citing [Professor] Russell L. Weaver, Langdell’s Legacy: Living With the Case Method, 36 Vill. L. Rev. 517, 544 (1991) (“At most law schools, one would have difficulty obtaining a teaching position if during the interview process he openly stated a preference for the lecture method. Junior faculty who consider other teaching methods may stick with the case method for fear of retaliation in the tenure process. Although faculty are free from such restraints once tenure is received, few alter their methods at this point. They have used the case method for many years and, because they received tenure, they have succeeded with that method.”)

1996                                                                                                                                Professor Areeda: “Classroom questions and hypotheticals can be unduly complicated in two ways: too intricate for quick oral comprehension and/or implicating too many issues. It is almost too obvious to say that classroom teaching cannot be effective unless students both (1) comprehend the problem or factual situation being discussed and (2) follow the responses and counter-responses. Most questions in class will be oral rather than written. Yet, I have heard instructors offer lengthy hypotheticals with many parties and a complex succession of facts. Such hypos work only at the end of the hour when they are, in effect, dictated to the students who write them down for later study. They are otherwise foolish, because students cannot absorb all the details or remember them in the course of the discussion… [and] even a simply stated and readily absorbed hypo may be too complex in a different sense: it may implicate too many issues. . . . [Furthermore,] one student’s formulation may be expressed in a way that the rest of the class will not readily understand. Or it may take him forever to make his point. Or the student’s point might not then be worth class time because it’s premature, quite special, or one whose exploration will not illuminate the issue before the class. In these situations, the ‘good guy’ professor makes a serious mistake. He fears that it would be rude to interrupt the unclear, prolix, or irrelevant student and so loses class momentum, wastes class time, and allows the rest of the class to be bored.” Phillip E. Aredda, The Socratic Method, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 911, 919-21 (1996) (formatting modified) (Professor Areeda is a renowned master of the Case Method from Harvard).

1992                                                                                                                                Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law: “[L]aw schools have long failed to teach students the practical skills they need to acquire because most of them become practitioners rather than academics[; and] Judges have continued to publicly admonish law schools for their failure to impart necessary information to students. . . . The homogeneity of the teaching profession has fed on itself, as homogeneity often does. As law teachers become ever less experienced in practice—i.e. as they become every more one sided—their concern for the practice decreased and their disdain for and desire to be wholly separate from practice increased… There is nothing like ignorance to promote elitist views, contempt and separation.” Lawrence R. Velvel, The Deeply Unsatisfactory Nature of Legal Education Today, Massachusetts School of Law at Andover 1992 pp.132, 140.

1991                                                                                                                                Professor Taslitz: “A ghost haunts traditional law school casebooks: the ghost of Christopher Columbus Langdell. . . Langdell’s method has been criticized for offering no clear guidance on legal reasoning, hiding black letter law, unnecessarily bruising student egos, and ignoring the artistry of lawyering and the distinct value that other disciplines offer to legal analysis. . . . We must exorcise Langdell’s ghost.” Andrew E. Taslitz, Exorcising Langdell’s Ghost: Structuring a Criminal Procedure Casebook for How Lawyers Really Think, 43 Hastings L.J. 143, 166 (1991) (emphasis added).

Professor Weaver: “If students had the opportunity to examine all of the decisions on a given subject from a given state, the discretionary aspect of judicial decision making would be apparent. They would realize that law is not as cut and dried as the casebooks and restatements make it appear to be… [It would be] easier to observe the law’s fluidity, to examine how policy considerations affect the outcome of cases, to see how judges treat legal rules, and to notice how important advocacy is to the outcome of cases.” Russell L. Weaver, Langdell’s Legacy: Living With the Case Method, 36 Vill. L. Rev. 517, 573 (1991).

1989                                                                                                                                Professor Kissam: “The principle of speed [in law school final exams] rewards students for answers that merely identify a maximum number of issues and specify precisely many different rules. This principle tends to de-emphasize, discourage, and penalize student writing that involves coherence, depth, contextual richness, and imagination.” Furthermore: “The daily work in most law school courses . . . fails to provide models, instruction, or practice for the issue spotting and rule applications required for Blue Book exams[,] . . . students . . . are left largely on their own to acquire the skills of issue spotting and rule application in particular fields.” Philip C. Kissam, Law School Exams, 42 Vand. L. Rev. 433, 453, 470 (1989) (also explains the use of grading keys).(Kissam’s article cited above or his book The Discipline of Law Schools: The Making of Modern Lawyers is a must read for all law students).

Famous and Brilliant Trial Lawyer Gerry Spence:

“[T]he truth is that no law student in America receives competent training in the art of advocacy… Generations of students [have been produced] who at graduation were utterly unqualified to do anything except what their professors did—study the law.” Spence also tells the following illuminating and hilarious story:

Several years ago I had the opportunity to speak…to a national convention of law-school deans. I had them trapped in a single room in Jackson Hole, and I wasn’t going to let them go without first torturing them with the pesky truth I thought they already knew and were mostly helpless to overcome. I was cruel. I said, “I’ve seen these bright kids come, gawking, into a courtroom, their brains full to overflowing like foam off the head of a badly drawn beer. They know the law and can cite the cases and they have learned to look intelligent because they have emulated you, and some have even read the dialogues of Plato. But standing there in the courtroom, they are as impotent as a herd of fat steers.” The deans stared back.

“It’s pitiful,” I said. “Makes you want to cry. It isn’t that these young men and women are stupid. It isn’t that they don’t desperately want to be competent in their life’s work, or long to be worthy and successful trial lawyers. But the truth is that they are released after all those years of toil and agony at your hands and they are still worthless. I have scores of bright, well-educated young men and women from your universities apply for employment to my office every year. The letters of application would break your heart. They want to be trial lawyers. They have labored endlessly to digest what you have fed them, in order, of course, that they may later regurgitate it in their exams—like one of my old cows calls up her cud. They have been probed and tested; they have been run through the cutting chutes of the educational system and they are the survivors, but they are still worthless. They are the victims of the system you perpetuated.” One of the deans got up to leave the room.

“Where are you going?” I asked. “I’m not finished with you.”

“I’m finished with you,” he said.

“Your law students never had that choice.”

“I do,” he answered, and slammed the door behind him. I saw a look of slight concern come over several of the remaining faces. But most looked as passive as a band of freshly shown ewes.

“Shall I continue?” I asked. “Or is this too damned painful for you to bear?”  A man in the front row with an easy smile and sleepy eyes said, “Continue, Mr. Spence. Maybe we need to hear this.”

“It’s free,” I said.

“So is a kick in the teeth,” somebody else said, and got up and left.

“Go ahead, Mr. Spence,” the man in the front row said again, and so I continued.

“Most of these young men and women have no other role models to follow, and so they tend to think like you, to make their faces look like yours, and even to walk like you. But most of you are not qualified to walk into a courtroom. I talked to a renowned trial lawyer in Denver the other day who told me he never hired young lawyers to help him anymore. ‘I hire nurses,’ he said. ‘Nurses?’ I asked. ‘Yeah,’ he said. ‘They’ve been taught to ask intelligent questions of the patient and to listen to someone who is hurt or frightened. They have been taught to care about the patient and write reports that others can rely on. They can get to the bottom of a case for me. Young lawyers just get in the way. They want to legalize everything, dehumanize every client, categorize every case, and box up people into causes of action and understand them in accordance with stare decisis. And after a year they demand partnership for their good work.’ He was right. The next day, I hired a local nurse myself, and she has been a great help to us ever since.” The man in the front smiled again, slightly. He shouldn’t have. It only encouraged me.

“I was asked by my son the other day what law school I would recommend to him. I said, ‘Well, we’ll try to find the school which is likely to teach you the least, because in that way you will have the least to unlearn before you can become useful as a lawyer.’…

I was flogging the innocent. What could the deans do? They, too, were caught in a system that had long ago been dominated by another group of elitists, the legal professors, the fussy savants of the law. The professors were not training young attorneys to represent people. They were teaching their students only what they themselves knew—the art of studying law.

Gerry Spence, With Justice for None (1989) p.55-59 (Spence’s book is a fun read for anybody interested in the law).

1984                                                                                                                                Professor Nielsen:

It is a fact that a student can graduate from this, the fourth largest law school in the United States, without ever having written a pleading, a contract, a will, a promissory note or a deed. It’s worse than that.

It is a fact that most students graduate from this law school without ever having seen a real honest-to-God pleading, or contract, will, promissory note or deed. A student can graduate without ever having set foot in a courtroom and without ever having spoken to, or on behalf of, a person in need of advice or counsel. A student can graduate without once being exposed to the operation of the rules of court.

It is a fact that such students and those similarly trained at most other schools do pass the bar exam and are certified as competent to render advice and to represent others in court. Whatever else may be said about this license issued by the state bar, let it be said that for these students and their clients it is a cruel hoax.

Law professors are not appalled by these facts mainly because they are products of the same type of education.

James R. Nielsen, My Turn: The Flaw in Our Law Schools, Newsweek, June 11, 1984, at 15.

1973                                                                                                                                The Honorable Former Chief Justice Warren E. Burger: “With few exceptions, law schools…fail to provide adequate and systematic programs by which students may focus on the elementary skills of advocacy.” Warren E. Burger, The Special Skills of Advocacy: Are Specialized Training and Certification of Advocates Essential to Our System of Justice?, 42 Fordham L. Rev. 227, 232 (1973).

1949                                                                                                                                Former Justice of the Second Circuit and Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission: “[I]n most university law schools the major part of three years is spent in teaching a relatively simple technique—that of analyzing upper court opinions, ‘distinguishing cases,’ constructing, modifying or criticizing legal doctrines. Three years is much too long for that job. Intelligent men can learn that dialectic technique in about six months. Teach them the dialectic devices as applied to one or two legal topics, and they will have no trouble applying them to other topics. But in law schools, much of the three years is squandered, by bored students, in applying that technique over an over again—and never with reference to a live client or a real law suit—to a variety of subject matters.” Jerome Frank, Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice, Princeton University Press (1949) p. 237.

1944                                                                                                                                 The American Association of Law Schools (AALS) Curriculum Committee Report on Legal Education found that the case method was “failing to do the job of producing reliable professional competence on the byproduct side in half or more of our end-product, our graduates.” Robert Stevens, Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s, The University of North Carolina Press (1983) p.214 quoting AALS Proceedings, 1944 at 168 (This report was written largely by one-time casebook defender and former law professor of Yale, Columbia, and Chicago, Karl Llewellyn).


Here is a VERY important point for you and everyone else in your community per any tax increase proposed by your local government(s). The new accounting changes for all government operations over the last few years is designed to make the operation “look” cash poor by requiring them to have funding for their “liabilities” up to 35-years out. (parking zone for the cash)

Now that might up front look like a prudent thing to do BUT, what they do is project their liabilities out 35-years cross-matched with their income of 1-year out. ** If you, I, or Bill Gates did the same thing we all would look like we are on death’s financial door.

They are moving on a tax increase not because they are short on cash today, they are doing it because they are pulling income and standing balances off their operating funds into “advanced liability accounts” creating the shortfall on their operating budget to justify the increase.

What is “ESSENTIAL” for you and all others in any local government venue to do is: Based on their “gross income, not net” last year (and go five years back) and then project their income based on projecting out 35-years to cross match with what they say their liabilities are…!

If that was done I have a feeling that viewing projected income 35-years out without ANY tax increase, they would be in the black by a BIG margin and NOT short of funds.

All local governments across the land are saying they are short of funds today because they are doing the same thing of projecting out liabilities 35-years cross-matched with projections of income out 1-year. So the same applies for every City, County, School District, University, Enterprise Operation across the land…

Detroit in declaring bankruptcy did the same thing right under the local public’s and nations view by promoting the liabilities out (one side of the coin) 35-years and not the income (the other side of the coin) for the same and got away with it. Detroit was sitting on 18-billion in liquid investment assets at the time when they did this. But they said their liabilities were 27-billion (projected out 35-years) claiming to be 9-billion short today…

Please share this communication with other activists in your state and ask them to do the same. Want to light a big fire under the corruption? Then make sure everyone Statewide sees this detailed outline communication As Soon As Possible. (A.S.A.P)

Sent FYI and Truly Yours,

Walter Burien –                                                                                                                                                                      CAFR1 NATIONAL POST