Pharmacist Speaks Out: Get Off Prescription Drugs, Avoid Vaccines

by: Shane “The People’s Chemist” Ellisonpharmacist-warns-prescription-drugs-avoid-vaccines-618x348

You gotta meet Margaret*.  I changed her name to protect her privacy.  She recently emailed me to vent against Western Medicine’s push to get everyone hooked on drugs and stab kids with risky, ineffective vaccines!  Interestingly enough, she has seen medicine from an angle that most people aren’t privy too. 

Margaret is a pharmacist.  With a Pharmacy (PharmD) degree, and over two decades working in the field of pharmacy, she’s seen firsthand how“guideline-driven” medicine has artificially forced every patient into the same clinical box, thereby hooking them on drugs. The result is that “Doctors don’t THINK anymore — they just do what they’re told, which is to put people on meds. So many people in medicine (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) don’t really question anything,” says Margaret. “They’re so busy that they just do what the ‘guidelines’ say to do, rather than look at individuals and what makes sense.”

A former employee of a major pharmaceutical company, Margaret left her job so she could spend more time with her family. At the time, she questioned her former employer’s “huge marketing budget” and now believes the marketing of drugs to the general public — along with guidelines-driven medicine — needs to stop.

“We never get the flu shot,” she adds, referring to herself and her family. “I’ve read the entire package insert and can take on anyone who tries to tell me that it is useful with just that information alone. My years in pharma taught me just how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome — they aren’t real studies at all.”

In a world where most parents don’t even bother READING the flu vaccine insert, Margaret is a refreshing example of a mother who takes charge.

She initially contacted me to ask: “Shane, what has been the response been to what you write about vaccines?  For those of us with licenses to protect, we don’t feel very safe voicing concerns about vaccines.”

I understood completely.

Big Pharma fires anyone who speaks out. They work hard to cover up the truth.

I told Margaret what I tell everyone: The science can’t be disputed.  And since my job doesnt depend on parroting the status quo, I’ve had no problems whatsoever. My four kids are all unvaccinated and are strong, healthy, and vibrant.  Attending school has never been an issue, and who cares anyway, health comes first.

Curious to learn more about Margaret’s experience as a pharmacist, I asked for an interview.

She generously agreed to share more of her perspective as a pharmacist.  What follows is a candid interview in which Margaret encourages parents to stop, THINK, and get a reality check when it comes to vaccinating their kids. Commenting on how vaccines are pushed — and sometimes even forced — on everyone, she says, “They’ve done a very good job of psychological indoctrination.”

She also shares her thoughts on what needs to change in mainstream medicine, and why she chose to stop vaccinating.

*Not her real name. Name changed to protect her privacy.

1. Please summarize your overall pharmacy experience and how you’ve generally worked with patients/clients.

Pharmacist: I’m a pharmacist, but not one who is into mainstream medicine. I have broad pharmacy experience, and many years working in Pharma (just like you, Shane)!

I heard the mantra, “Today’s drugs fund tomorrow’s discoveries…” but after a while, that didn’t justify the huge marketing budget in my opinion. I quit working at one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies without a job lined up. I had my first child, and I wanted to hang out with him and figure out next steps.

I think I like retail pharmacy best, because it’s so important to talk to patients about their medications, especially people who want to make lifestyle changes to get OFF their medications. But many people prefer to take a pill rather than change.

2. Why did you choose to become a pharmacist?

Margaret: I really stumbled into it! I never thought of myself as a science person, but I took some science classes and found I liked them. Pharmacy is just more science.

3. What are you most proud of when it comes to your career?

Margaret: I’ve enjoyed helping people. Especially if people are interested in lifestyle changes to get off medications — that’s a pleasure to help them.

4. What has shocked you the most, while working as a pharmacist?

Margaret: Even in pharmacy school, my professors stressed that things would change in our careers and we had to be adaptable. Yet so many people in medicine (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) don’t really question anything. They’re so busy (the workloads are so heavy!) that they just do what the “guidelines” say to do, rather than look at individuals and what makes sense.

When I was a student, clinical pathways or guidelines were a new thing, and now they’ve become essentially law — if you don’t follow treatment guidelines with what you recommend for a patient, you can be sued. The “art” of medicine has, for all practical purposes, disappeared.  Now it’s the Law of Medicine.

5. What is your biggest critique of mainstream medicine?

Margaret: Guideline-driven medicine. Most people have no idea about this and the effect on their health.  It makes everyone fit into the same box, and it drives your doctor’s treatment within that box instead of individualizing it.  [Everyone gets same drug, same dose.]

Doctors don’t THINK anymore — they just do what they’re told. The only guideline I think is unquestionable is the one for cardiac arrest — follow that emergency clinical pathway, for sure.  Otherwise, it’s all about hooking patients on drugs.

6. Have you chosen to vaccinate anyone in your family? 

Up to 6 months, yes.  But not all of them. At that point, I pulled the plug on vaccines (see here why), as well as our pediatrician. Now I use religious waivers.  Unfortunately, after the vaccines, one of my children became very lethargic. I had been researching them a lot up until then, and I decided to stop vaccinating.  From that point on I focused on nursing and boosting immunity naturally.

Later in life, my child was allergic to virtually all nuts and sesame. It didn’t run in our family.  I researched the sesame and found that the allergy is increasing in places like Asia and Israel, where most vaccines are in sesame oil.

Oils in vaccines don’t have to be labeled because they’re considered not active ingredients, and they may vary on the lot. Manufacturers break up lots of vaccines and ship them all over, so that there’s no pattern to any reactions.  Unfortunately, this can lead to the onslaught of allergic reactions.

7. Do you get the flu shot?

Margaret: We never get the flu shot. I’ve read the entire package insert and can take on anyone who tries to tell me that it is useful with just that information alone. 

It doesn’t work.

If you read the package insert, you’ll see that in the non-treated group, 4% got the flu. In the treatment arm, about 2% got the flu. So your risk of getting the flu is only 4% anyway. They got the 50% reduction in flu from simple math — 2% is half of 4%. But your odds of NOT getting the flu are 96%.

If you put it that way, then the shot is not very compelling, is it? But they made it sound like it was, by telling you your risk was reduced by 50% without telling you what the real odds of getting the flu were in the first place.

My years in pharma taught me just how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome — they aren’t real studies at all.

8. You mentioned, “My years in pharma taught me how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome — they aren’t real studies at all.” Can you explain what this means for the average American with respect to vaccines?

Margaret: Study design is not complicated. You have your null hypothesis, which supposes that there is no difference. And you have your hypothesis, which supposes that there IS a difference. To prove your hypothesis, you usually need such a big number of people that the study is too expensive to conduct. So they go cheap and do smaller studies that show numerical differences, but not statistically significant differences…and they run with that. All they ever need to do is show that their drug is not worse than the other drug, and they win. Then they can do a marketing spin with the data, like they have with the flu vaccine.

9. In your experience, how is the truth about vaccines being covered up?

Margaret: Studies and the lack of studies. The studies that are currently out there — even those for vaccine approvals — quite clearly show there are serious side effects. We don’t know who is most at risk, yet the uniform mandate that all these vaccines be given is forced on all of us.

People deny that there are serious side effects, and that makes me crazy because the package insert for the vaccines themselves say there are side effects! There is not one other drug where the dose is the same no matter how big the child is…and that is troubling. We should be studying why some children react badly. There are genetic differences among us that influence the efficacy or safety of other drugs…yet if you question vaccines, you’re called “Jenny McCarthy” or you’re told you don’t know the science.

But I DO know the science, and the science is not being examined at all. That’s irresponsible.

10. In your professional opinion, should ALL people be required by law to take vaccines?

Margaret: No. Unlike most other drugs that you could stop taking if you had a reaction, you can’t take back a vaccine. A person’s body is so precious, and even if he’s a total looney tunes, he has a right to say no to a drug. It’s not like saying no to breathing! And it’s not like smoking around children — that is so clearly dangerous, we all know that.

At one time, smoking was said to be helpful to athletes and was even promoted for athletic performance! The tide turned on smoking, once someone blew that whistle. There have been whistle-blowers for vaccines, yet the train for mandates keeps on going. When you look at the incidence of chronic conditions among children today, you have to ask, “Why?” Is it our food quality? Is it vaccines? Is it air and water pollution? Is it chemicals in our homes? Because we don’t know for sure, it should not be mandated.

11. What do you think about how vaccines are being pushed — and sometimes even forced — on everyone?

Margaret: They’ve done a very good job of psychological indoctrination. Most people believe vaccines have saved millions of lives from “HORRIBLE” diseases like measles, mumps, and even chickenpox. But when I ask people why they think those diseases were chosen for vaccines, as opposed to something like HIV, they have no answer. The answer is simple…making a vaccine for measles was easy. Making one for HIV is very hard. So drug development went the path of least resistance.

Then once a vaccine existed, suddenly the disease was proclaimed to be killing millions when it never did. Chickenpox is a great example. Everyone in my childhood had chickenpox and not one person I knew died or even had serious complications. By the way, the rationale for the development of the chickenpox vaccine was entirely economic — to avoid parents missing work. It was never about the disease itself being fatal. But once they had the vaccine, they then proclaimed that chickenpox was such a serious disease.

12. What is your biggest concern about vaccines and our kids today?

Margaret: We don’t know the long-term impact of what they’ve been given. We know now that there were simian viruses in the measles vaccines given in the 60s, and those simian viruses were oncogenic, meaning cancer-causing. There are also some very good animal studies that show an increase in autoimmune diseases in vaccinated primates. I worry most about the link with autoimmune diseases like MS, Rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus.

13. What would you like parents to know about vaccines?

Margaret: I think people have to stop and take a reality check. Depending on the age of your parents, ask them if they had measles, mumps, chickenpox, or pertussis. Ask them if it was really bad or if they knew anyone who died. Don’t ask about polio. (Polio, by the way, still exists today under different names, so it was not eradicated by the vaccine, and most cases of polio are not paralytic.) I asked my own parents, and they said they had all those diseases, and they really weren’t a big deal.

The best treatment for measles is vitamin A. It’s a disease that is quite mild if you have adequate vitamin A. Everyone used to know that, which is why so many kids back in the day took Cod Liver oil. Being sick sometimes is a part of life. We have to decide if we’re so terrified of ordinary diseases like measles that we would rather vaccinate against it and risk worse consequences like autoimmune diseases or cancer. I’d take measles over cancer any day.

We also need to educate parents that some of these diseases are actually MEANT to happen to children. Having some of these diseases triggers developmental processes in children. Just like a longitudinal study I saw where it was noted that children had growth spurts after they recovered from being ill. Being sick occasionally may actually be necessary for normal development.

14. What do you think needs to change in mainstream medicine?

Margaret: Stop the guidelines. Doctors are now reimbursed on their adherence to guidelines, which is why they push vaccines. They are paid less by insurance carriers if their vaccine rates decline, so they kick patients out who won’t do what they’re told to do. That’s why you should offer to pay cash (if you can) when you see your doctors so that they have less incentive to promote these things on you.

And stop allowing the marketing of drugs to the public. When that was approved, all of this craziness was unleashed. It’s been very detrimental ever since, because the media will never question something they make money from. Once they no longer make advertising money from drug companies, then the real questions will be asked. If people think the only reason any drug or vaccine was developed was to do “good,” they need to think again. Drug companies have marketing departments just like any other industry. It’s all about sales and how to convince (or force) you to take this drug, or get that vaccine.

Dear Doctor: how to avoid blame for causing autism

by Jon Rappoport

April 26, 2016

As the truth about horrendous vaccine-damage to babies emerges and spreads, doctors need advice on how to avoid blame. So this article is offered as a public service to the medical profession.

Dear Doctor, your best defense is: “I’m practicing proper medicine.” Always remember that. Don’t wobble. Don’t explain. Just keep saying it. It works. After all, you have decades of propaganda behind you. Make those lies operate for you. Stand on them. It’s your best strategy.

In your heart of hearts, you know you’re damaging the brains and nervous systems of many babies. But don’t give in. Just keep vaccinating them. Just keep the basic mantra going: “I’m practicing proper medicine.” Under no circumstances should you let conscience be your guide. That would put you in a world of trouble.

It’s useful, when necessary, when a baby is, say, on life support in intensive care after you vaccinated him/her, to accuse the parents. You assert the child is a victim of Shaken Baby Syndrome—and the unconscionable parents did the shaking. This puts them on the defensive, and potentially takes the case into the sinister arena of Child Protective Services, the agency that can remove a child from the home and place it in foster care as a ward of the State. The parents, who are already terrified because of what you did (vaccination), will be thrown into an even deeper vortex of fear. They will be less likely to speak out and blame you. Use your power.

Keep in mind that the parents can’t sue you or the vaccine manufacturer. Know you’re safe. The law mandates the only option: they go to the federal vaccine court, where they plead for compensation. That labyrinthine process could take years, during which time the parents will probably forget all about you. Feel safe and secure, because you are. Don’t get rattled. Move on.

If the word—you know the word—“autism” comes up, don’t give in to worry or fear. The Centers for Disease Control, essentially a PR front for the vaccine industry, has you well covered. They’ve slanted and cooked years and years of studies to show one and all that vaccines can’t cause autism. It’s a slam-dunk. You’re protected. Don’t argue. Don’t debate. Let the CDC back you up.

Do you see where I’m going, dear Doctor? You’re in a sweet spot. You’re not in trouble, so don’t make trouble. Bite your tongue if you have to, but don’t debate. Just keep vaccinating. Yes, you’re destroying many lives, but no one can prove it, because the CDC and other agencies control the meaning of “science.” If they say the Earth revolves around Mars, that’s science.

The only thing that can sink you is your own conscience. But listen. If your medical training has taught you anything, it’s that regret and remorse have no role in the practice of medicine. Compassion is best achieved through dispassion. Understand? You can’t wring your hands and gnash your teeth about unfortunate outcomes. If you did, you’d be paralyzed.

“Unfortunate outcome” equals “somebody else did it.” That’s your guide. You didn’t do it.

But simple assertion isn’t enough. You need to cultivate an attitude of easy arrogance. You’re standing on top of the mountain. Pretend you know everything there is to know. Learn how to hone that act. You’re the great humanitarian. You’re the tireless champion of the people. You’re the One.

The babies you vaccinate have poison in their veins. You have ice in yours.

And if necessary, if you have trouble sleeping at night, remind yourself that doctors who step out from under the umbrella of protection and confess their sins are doomed. You’ll be assailed and attacked by your own. You’ll be delisted and excommunicated from the circle. You’ll lose your income and even your license. You’ll be called crazy. You’ll suddenly find yourself in the camp of conspiracy theorists and other assorted fools. They’ll taint you even further. Your family will disown you. If you think you know how all this would feel, you’re deluding yourself. You have no clue.

Your oath of “first, do no harm,” is conditional. Do no harm, unless that ideal turns you into a non-vaccinator. Or a partial vaccinator. Or a vaccinator who wants honest research into the effects of vaccines.

“First, do no harm to yourself and your reputation and standing” is the actual oath. Learn it, absorb it, live by it.

Take two dollops of medical mind-control and call yourself in the morning, and check your head. Are you onboard with the program?

If you’ve ever worked in an ER, you know life can be brutal and ruthless. Apply that lesson to your own professional survival. If it comes down to a choice between damaging the brains of babies and sacrificing your own reputation in the medical community, make the ruthless decision.

You’ll be happy you did.

If not happy, at least satisfied.

Someone loses his/her life; you keep yours.

It works.

You’re in a business that’s all about what works. So this is that principle, applied on a different level you may not have looked at it before.

I’m showing it to you.

You’re welcome.

Carry on.

Don’t look back.

Never look back.

LEGAL, PERMITTED, AND ARRESTED

Legal, Permitted, and Arrested - Mises Wire

By Mark Thornton
(https://misses.org/profile/mark-thornton)
(~slightly edited by queen)

‘Marijuana’ was “Legalized” (Satanic language), the owners were permitted and they asked the GubberNut to conduct a business inspection. Instead the POlice busted them and stole all their stuff!!

We may be winning the war against the “War on Drugs,” but we still have a long ways to go. The Washington Post reports (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp2016/03/30/what-life-is-like-after-police-ransack-your-house-and-take-every-belonging-then-the-charges-are-dropped/) on the Shattuck family who were not only arrested but all their possessions were stolen by “Code” enforcement based on the so-called ‘asset forfeiture’ law.

A self-described Michigan “soccer mom” who had “every belonging” taken from her family (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/03why-armed-crug-cops-took-every-belonging-from-a-michigan-soccer-mom/) in a 2014 drug raid has been cleared of all criminal charges, 19 months after heavily armed “drug task force” members ransacked her home and her business. But in many ways, her ordeal is only beginning.

Ann Shattuck and her husband Dale, had been facing felony charges of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession with intent to manufacture and maintaining a drug house. But last month, Michigan Circuit Court Judge Daniel Kelly threw out all criminal complaints filed against the Shattucks “on grounds of entrapment by estoppel,” according to court filings.

(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2016/03/Shattuck_opinionOnDefendantsMotionToDismiss_recd02.22.16.pdf).

Entrapment by estoppel occurs when a pretend Government official leads a defendant to believe that their conduct is permissible under the law.

_________________________________________________________________

Code enforcement uses all kinds of trickery in order to increase criminal convictions in order to somehow justify their existence. Fortunately, the Judge saw through their activities and invoked “entrapment by estoppel.” Unfortunately this is not used by enough magistrates/judges to protect the innocent from out-of-control Order Followers.

A WORLD WAKING UP: DAMAGE AFTER VACCINATION

It’s no longer an “anecdote”
by Jon Rappoport

The medical cartel has a puzzle palace. Inside this structure, words are woven in secret, to confuse, distract, and evade.

The most important wing of the palace is engaged in explaining away the cartel’s own crimes.

Here is an example of how their gnomes operate. Follow the circular pattern closely: “We never call vaccine damage by that name. No. We say that, in order to prove damage, people must show a vaccination led to an official disorder. Well, we own all the disorders. We define them. So, when we want to, it’s easy for us to ‘prove’ that vaccination doesn’t lead to a disorder. Therefore, we can say the damage never happened.”

If you’re confused, you’re supposed to be. It’s stage magic.

Meanwhile, in reality…

Despite massive efforts to keep the lid on, more and more people are waking up to the brutal fact of severe and sudden damage after vaccination.

Bob Wright, the former CEO of NBC, just gave it voice in his new book—in his account of what happened to his grandson. Robert De Niro, who has an autistic son, is now pushing people to see the film, Vaxxed. De Niro isn’t just talking theory. Obviously, he knows his son suffered life-changing injury from vaccination.

Other parents have been speaking out for years. Their true stories are now taking on new urgency.

Of course the parents know. They were there. They knew their children. They knew what they were before and after vaccination. They saw the tragic change. It’s no mystery.

Wherever there are honest reporters, it’s time for them to step up and do what they once believed was their mission.

We are in a shift away from the morbid lies of the medical profession and its allies. They’ve been acting as agents of deception. They’ve been performing as actors in a grotesque play. It’s time to close that play down.

Whether you call vaccine damage autism or encephalopathy or developmental delay or some other cooked-up name, the central event is the same: a child was vaccinated; the child was severely injured. The child’s brain and nervous system took a heavy, heavy blow.

There are no mitigating circumstances or clever terms to cover up the fact.

The children and the parents are the living evidence of harm.

Don’t let this go. Don’t let the truth slip away.

Under the surface of daily life, there are many, many of these children and parents.

The media ignore them and will ignore them as long as they can. But the media day of doom is dawning. They censored the truth. They protected the crimes and criminals. They pretended to know “science.”

When I began working as a reporter, in the early 1980s, one of the first sources I went to was a doctor in Los Angeles. As we talked, the subject turned to vaccines and the claim they strengthened the immune system. I asked him how he could possibly believe vaccinating a baby, whose immune system had hardly begun to develop, could produce protection. And how could he imagine giving vaccines to people barely hanging on to life in poverty-stricken countries—their immune systems disabled and on the verge of collapse—would provide protection against disease.

He sat and stared at me.

Obviously, he hadn’t ever considered these questions.

Finally, he said, “This is science. It isn’t a common-sense subject.”

That was an illumination.

I suppose, if he were suddenly confronted with a group of mothers, who knew their children’s brains had been damaged by vaccination, who had been there at the moment it happened, he would say the same thing.

And his answer would reek of the lunacy of a madman on the loose.

Let me suggest a parallel to the breakout film, Vaxxed, which exposes deep fraud at the CDC, where the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism was covered up. Vaxxed was recently censored at two film festivals—-it was labeled “dangerous speech.”

You’re standing under an awning on a rainy street at night. You’re looking for a cab. You see, 20 feet away, under a streetlight, a man killing another man—and you quickly take out your cell phone and film the murder.

A police car pulls up, two officers get out, put the dead victim in the trunk, and usher the killer into the front seat of the car. The car moves away.

The next day there are no stories in the press about a murder. You visit a police station and report what you saw and where. You’re told nothing happened. There was no killing.

You go home. You think about it. You visit the biggest newspaper in the city and sit down with a reporter and show him what you filmed.

Without pause, he says, “You’re endangering lives. You’re attacking the reputation of the police. They protect the citizens of the city. If people lose faith in law-enforcement, there’ll be nothing but chaos.”

“But what about this?” you say, pointing to your cell phone.

The reporter shrugs. “It’s easy to fake footage. People do it all the time. Don’t bother taking it to a television station. They’ll never show it. They censor false images, and they should.”

You spend the next few days looking at the face of the killer in your film and searching online for that face.

Finally, you find it.

It’s the face of the most prominent doctor in the city.

 

 

 

B.A.R. ATTORNEYS – NO LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY IN COURTROOMS

April 15, 2016 David- William Crown Temple B.A.R. 0

Untitled1

By:  TLB Staff Writer  |  David-William  

April 12, 2016

B.A.R. ATTORNEYS ARE SELF APPOINTED AND HAVE NO LICENSES

Connecticut Attorney, Simeon E. Baldwin, invited a group of 100 Attorneys from 21 states and the District of Columbia to meet on the 21st day of August of 1878, at Saratoga Springs, New York, to organize the American B.A.R. Association.  Most of the men were elite corporate lawyers.  Author Jethro K. Lieberman described early ABA membership: “You could become an invitee to membership if you were white, Protestant and native born, preferably with a British surname, and attended the elite law schools such as Harvard, Yale and Columbia; only then did you have a chance of prospering. Catholics, Jews, women and blacks were automatically excluded from membership. This exclusion was necessary to the elite bar’s sense of identity. Any fraternity is defined not only by whom it accepts but also by whom it excludes. The Association also pinned the stigma of immorality on the lower class of lawyers as shysters who talked, dressed and acted differently.”

In 1902 the ABA quit meeting regularly at Saratoga Springs; from that point to 1936 it met in different cities as a means to attract new members.  Thus ABA membership grew to 29,008 in 1936. Other statistics demonstrated the same story.  The bar went from just two sections, each with two officers, to 14 sections with 960 officers in 1935. The number of committees rose from 18 in 1902 to 27 in 1935.  Membership revenues in those years increased from $8,255 to $197,877.66.  

The ABA’s fight against the New Deal led more liberal attorneys to start their own society called the National Lawyers Guild.  A mixture of populists, Marxists, and progressive attorneys, mostly on the East Coast, formed the guild in 1937. This move was also motivated by the fact that the ABA represented a largely elite base of lawyers associated with big business while ignoring the legal needs of the lower classes and minorities.

In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.

Black’s Law Dictionaries 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st: “Lawyers:  A person learned in the law as an attorney, counsel, or solicitor, a person licensed to practice law, any person for who for fee or reward, prosecutes or defends, causes in courts of record, or other judicial tribunal, of the United States, or of any other State, or whose business it is to give legal advice, in relation to any case or matter, whatsoever.”  (Act of July 13, 1866 – Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121)

The B.A.R. Association has no Legislative Authority to have been created.  They’re a private corporation.  The Attorners are self appointed!  They gave themselves their authority, and they’re using fraudulent Statutes.  They just came in, took over, and they’re taking full advantage of the fact that no one will dig and read their real history.  

THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE!!!  THE B.A.R. IS A PRIVATE INDUSTRY, A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.  They’re trying to make everyone believe they have Congressional Authority that they simply do not have. 

Where in the Statutes at Large were Lawyers, most especially Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, ever given the authority to practice law in the courtroom?  There isn’t even Legislative Authority for the International B.A.R., or the American B.A.R., the British Accreditation Registry, to be created, much less, authority to work in the courts, and to monopolize the courts.  They’re a private corporation, and they issue their own union cards, which they deceptively call “Licenses.”  Imagine a private Carpenter’s Union issuing their own licenses.  This type of monopoly is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton Trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Smith Act.  They’re a SELF-APPOINTED monopoly.  These are foreign Agents registered under F.A.R.A.  

As the years passed, these foreign Agents managed to get themselves unlawfully into Offices of Trust so they could shape statutes and codes to suit their agenda, rendering all their unconstitutionally created garbage, null and void, nunc pro tunc. 

Article XIII put the teeth into this:

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:  “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”

Article XIII  “If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

Do you have an understanding of what is meant when the original Article XIII says, “such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Does it mean federal citizen of the United States only when it says, “under them, or either of them.” Doesn’t that mean federal (corporation) United States and also unincorporated United States?  So as anyone can read, especially the fraudsters who claim to have gone to law school, THEY’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO ANY OF THE THINGS THEY DO!  In 1871, the B.A.R. Attorners/Brokers for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Banksters created a Military Coup on D.C., setting up the Bankster’s seizure of all commerce.  They’re foreclosed from partity with the living, so they created U.S. citizenship, so all U.S. citizens would be in contract with the Crown, as DEBTORS for the artificial BANKRUPTCY.   

A lawyer is some one who studies law. An attorney is someone who holds the profession of attornment, the taking of property, people and goods for it’s owner/master.

Under the Attorney General Manual, while under Martial Law Rule, section 3.2 – 110, History, all one needs is to be learned in the law, not Color of Law.

Every single court case has been based upon fraud.  No B.A.R. Attorner has any legislative authority to prosecute anyone in any court room.  The B.A.R. Attorners do not know law.  They cannot sit at the Bench.  They live in Color of Law!  the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Editions clearly are written to mislead the readers, alleging and suggesting they were created by Congressional Authority, but they weren’t.  Black’s Law 5th has no such history either – Attorney House Counsel, Right to an Attorney, Counsel, Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 was REMOVED!!!  They’re a FRAUD!  No one masquerading as a “Judge,” or “government official” can produce proof of their delegation of authority.  There is no law allowing them to walk into the courtroom, much less to sit at a bench. They have NO JURISDICTION!  They’re robbing America!  It’s a closed union shop, and an overthrow of our constitutional form of government.  All court cases are Piracy!

The Crown Temple British Accreditation Registry is nothing but a continuing criminal enterprise. They’re Administrating and monetizing everyone’s Estate Trust for the Bankruptcy created by the Crown Banksters.  They’re weaseling everyone’s consent into being collateral for the DEBT, without full and complete disclosure, under the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913, after they set THEMSELVES up, for themselves, by themselves, with no lawful authority.   They’re imposters! Black’s Law said they have authority, when they DON’T.  Under the Private Attorney General Act, the people can do what they do.  They have nothing!  They can’t claim the P.A.G. Act, but we can!

Color of Law, is NOT law.  It’s fiction for corporate fictions.  It’s time to prosecute them, under real law, for prosecuting living people under Color of Law.  Again, they’re TERRORISTS, for the foreign Crown Banks.  They are not qualified to hold Offices of Trust.  The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the lower Courts and the Office of Attorney General, but these offices are not to be filled by the B.A.R. Attorners.  The Administrative Procedure Act, Senate Bill 7, says we, people can walk into a Court to represent people, not B.A.R. Attorners.  The law says who can walk into the Courts, and that’s us. 

B.A.R. Rule 11: An Attorney cannot represent you!  Corpus Juris Secundum, volume 2, volume 4. They have no duty to us.  They’re  also in violation of the Patriot Act, Section 800,  Title 18 USC 2331 – TERRORISM.  This violates Title 18 USC 241 and 242 – CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.  Also Title 18 USC 1621 – PERJURY.  Also Title 18 USC 1346 – HONEST SERVICE.  Also Title 18 USC 1918 –LOYALTY.  Felony after felony after felony!  In Black’s Law, the Attorneys who wrote the books quoted Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 for “Lawyers” and it’s not even in there!  No matter where an Attorney is involved, in any type of case, it’s FRAUD.  Anything a Lawyer does in a Court room is a FRAUD.  They have no authority to sit at a Bench.  As soon as they tell you that you cannot bring law into the Court room, they just proved they have no Subject Matter Jurisdiction.  They’re nothing but foreign Agents under CITY OF LONDON.  

Title 31 USC 3729 – FALSE CLAIMS, EMBEZZLEMENT, FRAUD.  

To demonstrate how rotten they really are, look at the material below:

Murdock vs. Pennsylvania explains that no State can make you get a license or pay a fee to exercise your rights.  Forcing someone to join the B.A.R.  and to get a license violates Murdock vs. Pennsylvania, and one’s rights under Article X.  The B.A.R. is under the Crown, not the united States of America.  In the July 1868 Congressional Record, the B.A.R. was never Ratified.  The B.A.R. issues it’s own B.A.R. Cards, not licenses, and their requirements are made by their Rules.  

The New Hampshire B.A.R. Supreme Court created it’s own rules for this requirement in the sneakiest way imaginable.  Article 73-a was added to the Constitution.  After the Article passed through the House, AFTER, they weaseled in a clause, “…Rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law.”  That’s how they coerce the B.A.R. agenda upon anyone who wishes to uphold the real rule of law over the foreign B.A.R. Courts.  

Well worth mention, there’s a STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Family Court “Rule 1.2 – Waiver of Rules.”  Their rules can be law, then they can waive their rules!  The B.A.R. does what it wants, while the people are oblivious.

Now, the stinking B.A.R. is pushing U.N. upon us like no-one has ever seen before.  They’re nothing but Agents for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Bankster whores who just cannot get enough.  These Pirates are robbing us of our lives.  They’re the ones stealing our homes in fraudclosure.  These are the Pirates stealing our kids.  They’re making money by putting people in prison for smoking a weed that grows in nature.  These creeps need to be prosecuted by everyone until they’re destroyed. 

If their authority is not created by law, then they’re not accountable to law.  This is why they rape and plunder everything and everyone.  They do whatever they please.  The only thing they’ll comprehend is PROSECUTION.  Demand their proof of Legislative Authority.  They want to prosecute people for practicing law without a license, when THEY DON’T HAVE ONE!!!  All they have is a stinking UNION CARD.  They’re nothing but two bit hoods.  If B.A.R. Attorneys had a real guts, they’d commit more respectable crimes, like snatching purses from little old grandmothers. Show them no respect, because they don’t deserve any.  They’re ruining America for the Crown.

Much of the material in this Article comes from a great guy, Rod Class.  You’ll hear him in this Video.  This is very important.  Spread this to others, so they can discover Rod’s work.  Enjoy!


LAWYERS & THEIR SUPPOSED AUTHORITY

THE APOCALYPSE IS NOW

When more people get to understand the depth of betrayal, and the truth about their slavery and hope of remedy, then we can restore the republic. My god, the entire court system outside the supreme court are nothing more than private corporations with one purpose; to extract tribute from the enslaved American idiots. They dumbed us down, taught us to embrace and thrive in our slavery all without too many knowing, that is until the Internet allowed extreme speed of information sharing.

If some one had no money but they had tons of debt, and you know how to discharge it for them, just phukking do it. As you teach them, every dollar discharged comes off the ‘debt.’ It cost nothing but your time, and brings you and your family and everyone closer to redemption from debt, and the more who They see awakened, makes them panic, get exposed in their fraud and dragged down and put a stop to this evolution to a socialist communist fascist Nazi dictatorship, run by the new council of 13 supercongress bullsh!t.

Municipalities and lower courts are criminal mafias leaching billions from us everyday. Did you know 99% of those paying property taxes have no legitimate obligation? It’s all racketeering! How about 99% of the people on the road are not in commerce and therefore not lawfully required to have a license registration or insurance -it’s all fraud and racketeering under color of law. Then there are the millions who pay an income tax, and no law exists to require them. Ordinances are not even LAWS. How about the poison fluoride in our water, the chemtrails dropping toxic nasty chemicals and metal waste into our air, or the food additives like aspartame that is like consuming formaldehyde. Don’t forget all the loyal American troops killed in banker’s wars based on lies, leaving so many of them damaged, or committing suicide at the rate of 22 per day, and some turned into psychotic murdering or abusive cops.

The private federal reserve frauds, the inside job of 9-11. There is an invisible war upon the American people by a private corporation called UNITED STATES, who sold us to the WTO/IMF/so-called FEDERAL RESERVE to float loans. If you are registered to them, you are their property, and it is in their best interest to keep you under control and believing you are free long enough to make it impossible for you to resist -your species forever being enslaved. We are close to that point now, with smart meters, cell towers, surveillance cameras, and “look for suspicious activity” Report your neighbor” rhetoric.

Every public official sued in anyway for violating someone’s rights, is a victorious battle in a war without violence. A war for freedom and true justice, and a move towards a restoration of a constitutional republic, as our government’s instructions laid out.

If you can write a good cause of action, and know how to sue, SUE EVERY COP EVERY JUDGE EVERY MUNICIPALITY THAT YOU CAN IF THEY VIOLATE YOUR RIGHTS like ordinance abuse, traffic tickets, property tax fraud, anything you can.

They killed Jerry Kane and his son
They grabbed Dave Myrland
They put away Lynn Meredith
They made an example of Irwin Schiff
and Michael Bieterand and many others
They murdered La Voy Finicum, then caged 25
of those patriots from the Bundy stand-offs,
dangerous for exposing the frauds of the Globally insane.
They convicted Bernard von NotHaus for measuring his silver in the
increment of a Dollar and called it counterfeiting – ridiculous.
They murdered 14 homeopathic doctors within the last 12 months.

This is it. There is no call not to be selfless in the cause of this Revolution.

Give me liberty or give me death!
FREEDOM OR NOTHING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neil Keenan, the Chinese, the “All of It” — by Judge Anna

Sunday, April 17, 2016dismantlethemachine

by Judge Anna

What I know for sure is that the Nationalist Chinese government placed a LARGE sum of gold on deposit with the New York Fed in 1928 just before the fall of the Nationalist Chinese government.  The Fed used that gold for years and were supposed to pay interest on the use of it, and didn’t.  They didn’t like the Communist Chinese government, so they just wrote off their own fiduciary responsibility to the Chinese people — the lawful heirs of the gold horde—and proposed to keep it for themselves.

Neil Keenan brought suit against the New York Fed in 2011 to correct this.  But they had already bankrupted the old Federal Reserve System in 2009, so they pleaded bankruptcy protection.  Technically, the gold had been held by member banks in the old bankrupt system, so it was argued that all those assets were part of the holdings of the bankrupt banks and blah, blah, blah.  It was only after the discovery of prior known bankruptcy fraud and willful disregard of fiduciary management on the part of the Federal Reserve that the perps were eventually cornered and forced to cough up.

Now, I have no reason to like the Communist Chinese government, but like it or not, they are representing the Chinese People and the gold belongs to the Chinese People.  It does not belong to us.  It does not belong to the New York Fed.  It needed to go back to China and the interest on it needed to be paid.

Neil Keenan fought hard for that. Any right thinking human being on this planet who would want their property returned in a similar situation has to agree with him and with the Chinese government. It was a lawful debt, fair and square, no question about it.

Unfortunately, when the bankers got to thinking about their options, they decided to turn their lemons into lemonade.  Having been forced to pay the Chinese off they said—-what the Hell?  If you can’t beat them, join them….. and they moved their focus of operations to China.

And suddenly, the Chinese Elders appeared.

I don’t know why the Powers That Be treat us like little children and invent fairytales for us, but they do.

The Fed banks stole us and our parents and grandparents and virtually everyone else on the planet blind for over a hundred years—–not just the Chinese.

The banks are like Pawn Shop owners caught with stolen loot they need to offload. So the Chinese who had finally gotten their own back, took delivery “in behalf” of everyone else, and “unofficially” have been trying to return the world’s wealth to the actual heirs.  Of course, those participating in this whole hand-washing effort become accomplices-after-the-fact, but so long as they carry through on a fair distribution of the wealth and pay back the debts everyone else is owed, I think we can thank Neil Keenan and those who have fought the fight to this point.

Somebody had to do the job.  It might as well be Neil Keenan and his group and the Chinese.  The one real beef I have so far is that a clean breast of it is not being made.  People are once again being told fairy tales and given excuses, which leaves everyone building on lies and sand.  Better that the Whole Truth come out and that the banker’s games come to a permanent end.

The danger now is that certain elements in the Chinese Government might have short memories, especially under the goading of the Federal Reserve bank criminals who are obviously trying to convince them that they can get away with doing unto us and everyone else what the Fed so recently tried to do to them—- ignore their fiduciary responsibility to return other people’s property,  claim that all the assets “recovered” rightfully belong to the Chinese—-when they don’t all belong to the Chinese any more than the Chinese gold belonged to the Federal Reserve Banks.

This is why there is a danger of WWIII and that is what the “Federal Reserve” Banks are trying to foment anyway, because they make out like bandits whenever there is a war.

Now, again, if the Chinese officials are thinking things through, they know that the records are the records and that the whole world will consider them criminals if they don’t return the property of the other nations, but now the political shoe is on the other foot—- they, quite rightly, don’t want to give our money back to the criminals in DC who are responsible for stealing it from us in the first place.  And just as the Federal Reserve banks tried to justify keeping the Chinese gold and not paying the interest to the current Chinese government on the basis that that government is Communist, the Chinese government is loathe to give back American gold to the rats in DC, because they know DC is a criminal empire and the gold will not go to the American People and will instead go to evil purposes.

Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t.

This has resulted in many desperate efforts to give the gold to any responsible American organization willing to represent the actual American People in this matter. I have had at least two dozen organizations approach me wanting to give me gold for the American People— but here is the problem as cited above, it’s a damned if you do and damned if you don’t proposition. This is profoundly dirty money—money derived from embezzlement, identity theft, credit theft, enslavement, bankruptcy fraud, unlawful conversion of titles and asset ownerships—-filthy money.  The bankers and politicians want to pretend that “it never happened”— just empty the vaults of the loot, give it back to the owners— and no admissions are made, nobody held accountable. Total black out and immunity.  Everyone has a big party with the “pennies from Heaven” or the “Chinese Elders” or “SWISSINDO” or  Neil Keenan  or whoever takes on the responsibility of distribution.

People all over the world have accused me of being a Girl Scout and a prissy little prig who doesn’t want to get her hands dirty, a moralist who denies the practical good of distributing the wealth back to the actual people who own it, or an even nastier kind of moralist who wants to see heads roll and bankers and politicians hung by the neck until dead, etc., etc., etc., —– but the plain fact of it is that I don’t believe that such a snow job can succeed in the modern world and I don’t think that the world should be rebuilt on lies and fairytales. I think we all have to take a share of the blame, hang our heads, and admit what has happened here.

America has been one of the most enslaved nations on the planet.  That’s the fact.  Most of the world has been enslaved for generations by corrupt mostly western governments and banks and lawyers used as the attack dogs of banks.  That’s what has happened here.  All this new-found wealth is built on the blood of soldiers who have been lied to, on the blood of innocent women and helpless children, on gold teeth extracted from Jewish corpses, on slave labor in India and Bangladesh, on farmland laid waste, on water defiled, on innocent animals being abused, on every kind of evil you can think of.  We have to admit that. We have to stare it in the eye, and if only for a brief time, we have to own the facts and remember how we got here.

It is not just a petty sense of morality that requires it.  It’s the danger of going forward into a New World without such a reckoning.  I am not going to ally myself with the fraud or try to protect it, and I certainly won’t try to prolong any continuance of it.   I am not going to stretch out my hand without a clear recognition that what I receive is only what is rightfully mine, a stolen inheritance being returned.

The men who knowingly created this monstrous “system” are long dead and gone.  All that remains are their heirs and second and third generation cappos who “did what we are told” and for the most part they never stopped to question anything.  As one judge in Alaska told me, “that’s the way we do things….that’s the way we’ve always done things….”  It didn’t occur to him that what he was doing was wrong, much less that it was criminal.  The fraud had been set in motion so long ago that nobody even recognized it as crime.  It’s time that we did— not out of vengeance or any need to cause further harm, but simply to recognize the truth and avoid ever going through such a debacle again.

Men are by nature creatures of habit.  We become easily indoctrinated.  We function on assumptions.  We label things and try to shove reality into boxes. We even try to shove each other into neat little thought containers— “black” and “white”, “Jew” and “Muslim”, and so on.  Knowing this about ourselves gives us an opportunity to rise above our current condition and these known weaknesses. We can learn to entertain a healthy degree of skepticism.  We can learn to laugh at ourselves.  We can learn to forgive.

The one thing we can’t do is hide our heads in the sand and leave our butts in the air anymore.

So how do the Americans get their share without feeding the Beast in Washington?  We establish a National Depository on neutral Native Tribal land and use the Post Offices as distribution and service centers to deliver banking services. We use Money Orders instead of checks.

We do what people all over this country have done and are doing.  We rebuild the lawful government we are heir to, establishing Jural Assemblies, county by county. We mint our American Silver Dollars and issue certificates based on them, until such time as block chain technology renders the old banking system and its limitations archaic. It shouldn’t be long. We organize our states on the land again and call for a Continental Congress. We send our delegations of elected state deputies (fiduciary officers, not “representatives”).  We do all the housecleaning and housekeeping that has been neglected for 150 years.

We explain to the rest of the world that our proper governmental system was usurped by banks and self-interested corporations and that the “United States” is not “America” so please stop using these names in the same breath as if they ever were one-in-the-same.  They are not and haven’t been since the foundation of this country—they’ve just been deliberately confused by venal men engaged in semantic deceit, seeking to defraud other people and other nations.

The American People are not alone in this condition. More than half the world is in the same boat. If we feel stupid, we’ve got plenty of company.

Please understand that Americans were victimized and duped as bad or worse than everyone else. Understand that 98% of the foreign aid we gave in good faith was stolen by criminals who were merely under contract to provide us with governmental services. Over 80% of the money we gave to help the poor in this country never reached its intended destination, either.  Understand that we were lied to and robbed blind.  Understand that we were conscripted into all sorts of “federal programs” against our will and have suffered under armed racketeering that was protected under color of law for many years.

Instead of being afraid of the “Apocalypse”—- which merely means the drawing back of a curtain or revelation— be glad.  Like popping a boil or draining a wound, it may hurt a bit, but it is the only way we can heal the past.

Repeat of What Anna Says About Contracts and Quantum Grammar

Sunday, April 17, 2016dismantlethemachine

by Anna Von Reitz

Anna says all contracts created by men are bull.   It’s all hokum and fraud.  We aren’t competent to guarantee what we will be doing at ten o’clock tomorrow morning, much less thirty years from now when we are supposed to pay off a mortgage.  That is the fact of the matter.  And that means that nothing we promise to do has any binding force or true validity.  It doesn’t matter what language you use, or if it is grammatically correct or not.  People have no control of their circumstance or life-span or any of the many, many contributing factors that go into whether or not a contract—-even a contract made in “good faith”—can or will be kept.

Ever tried to enforce a contract against someone truly down on their luck?  Do the words “blood out of a turnip” have meaning for you?

Therefore, all contracts made by men and even by our institutions— governments, corporations, etc.,—-are rendered ridiculous and void the moment they are signed. If that is not obvious to everyone on this planet by now, it surely should be.  All that a contract can be and all that it can represent is a “good faith intention”. That’s why a “loan” is not the same thing as a “debt” and why the moral obligation to keep your promises if at all possible matters.

Now, if it makes sense to you that Russell Gould somehow rules the world through the Post Office and that this is because certain keyholes and gates at the Vatican no longer line up with the constellations the way they used to, you don’t need me.  You need a psychologist.  I don’t think these guys — Russell Gould and David-Wynn: Miller— mean anything but good toward the world, but the fact is that they have gone down the rabbit hole and learned to think like most of the Pope’s advisors and that is a real problem, because good intentions are no fit replacement for reality and a dictatorship based on one man that was bad before is unlikely to be any better just because you change the man in charge.  I have the same problem with Frank O’Collins.  He apparently means well, but he was a Jesuit and he learned to think like a Jesuit and he can’t break out of the mold.  He is still stuck.  He is still creating his version of the same bad old template pattern, making the same assumptions, and therefore recreating the same problems he is trying to escape.  And what does that get us?  More of the same insanity.

Let me hop up and down on one leg, substitute numbers for letters to make a new code language, start writing mathematically correct grammar rules, and declare myself Queen of the World and see how many people buy into that, either.  There’s a reason that people won’t believe it.

The entire rationale of the claim made by the Holy See back in 1302 was flawed to begin with and in responding to such a claim with new counter-claims all you do is build fraud upon fraud. You unavoidably bring forth a new fraud that is the derivative of the old fraud. Rabbits give birth to rabbits.  Thus the Unity-States-of-Our-World Trust becomes Unam Sanctum 2.0.

If you believe and give credence to the Bible at all, you have to admit that no man can breach the covenants of God and you have to realize that Pope Boniface VIII over-reached himself and trespassed against two Divine Trusts that were not his to breach when he created the Unam Sanctum Trust.  Both the Adamic Trust and the Abramic Trust owed to all people descended from Adam and Eve and to all the Sons of Abraham, respectively, were breached by Boniface’s actions.

For fellows that advocate the adoption of mathematically correct grammar neither Russell nor David-Wynn appear to grasp the fact that if you start out with a breach of trust you end up with a breach of trust.

Similarly, replacing the current legal jargon which is aptly described as “legalese” with Quantum Grammar does not appear to be a net gain, because numbers can be manipulated and redefined as readily as letters and the use of such a language to try to construct valid contracts would be just as doomed to failure for the natural causes already cited and would be even less understandable for average people who would have to hire “experts” and then depend upon those “experts” to enforce and interpret and judge every aspect of any such agreements.

That would give those experts ultimate power over the outcome of all disagreements and the corrupting affect of such power is already known.

Just as we had the Big Fight known as the Protestant Reformation in part over the translation of the Bible from Latin to modern languages, we would have the Big Fight over translation of contracts into Quantum and then another Big Fight over their proper translation back into non-Quantum.

And worst of all,  it would all be a Big Fight over interpreting and enforcing contracts, which are impossible and null and void by definition anyway.

Stop for five seconds and let abject craziness of all this sink in and let me repeat: All human contracts are void by nature. Why?  Because we don’t have what it takes to make contracts, and neither do our human institutions and corporations, which have life-spans and limitations just like we do.

I know that Russell and David-Wynn think of Quantum as a way to overcome the Tower of Babel and reduce everything down to simple and irreducible terms and that is a noble enterprise so far as it goes, but neither one seems to have the scientific background to know and truly understand how prone mathematics can be to manipulation and misinterpretation. Mathematics is just another language. It has the same flaws. Is it a better tool for making contracts than German or English or Peruvian?  Arguably so, but why are we engaged in doing something as dumb and as dishonest as making contracts in the first place?  Once you give up assuming and believing that you can make contracts when you clearly can’t, the whole underlying miasma of lies and pain and purgatory and owing and usury collapses.

So, as Quantum is conceived as a better means of forming valid binding contracts, and as it is a literal impossibility to form valid binding contracts in the first place, let’s just quit trying to do the impossible while we are ahead?

Let your yes be yes and your no be no.  Live in the moment of Now, because Now is your only time and sure possession.  Live now, love now, give to each other now.  Neither store up riches upon the Earth, nor speak of any Future as a certainty.

Even the Great Writs and great documents like The Declaration of Independence and agreements like The Constitution for the united States of America are nothing more or less than expressions of Will and good faith intentions, so let us take our moral obligations to heart and question our commitments more deeply, understanding anew that they do not derive from some moldy bit of parchment, but from the hearts and minds of living men who give life and light and meaning to the words and principles of justice and compassion.

The efforts of Russell and David are well-meant, heroic, and well-taken.  The efforts of the men who have helped them, too, but it is a fact that neither we nor our institutions are competent to make contracts. We can agree on things, we can express our intentions, we can testify as to our Will—-but not make contracts. It may seem like a picky point to you, but I assure you that it is not.  It is the difference between truth and falsehood.

Maxim of Law demands that fraud taints everything it touches.  Whatever agreements we had with Britain were breached and Dishonored by the British Government and the Crown in 1822, less than fifty years after The Declaration of Independence.  The proof is the Treaty of Verona of 1822 and the subsequent Treaty of Verona 1845.

On Tuesday our nation will begin to face the onslaught of a currency war mistakenly directed against us because of the misdeeds and criminality of British subjects residing on our soil and acting under color of law while pretending to “represent” us and our lawful government.   These undeclared foreign agents include the members of the Bar Associations and international bankers who have defrauded and pillaged us without mercy while working for the British Crown.

Yes, these are things that I am griping about, but believe me, the worst firestorm of invective I could ever possibly pour down upon those responsible would pale into insignificant whispers when compared to the gravity of their sins, errors, and omissions.  These false friends have done damage to us and to our economy and to our reputation and to our good names that our enemies could never hope for.

I want it very clearly understood that I am not a British subject of any kind and neither is anyone in my household.  I want the world to know that we, Americans, have been defrauded and abused by these criminals in suits.  If anyone wants the American Gold they will have to ask the Pope and Queen Bess where it went and I do hope that the Chinese and Russian Governments fully understand that our nation has already been gutted by these thieves as their thanks to us for standing by them through two World Wars.

If Russell has any magic beans in his pocket this would be the moment to come forward.  I don’t think that any good suggestions or practical solutions or leadership initiatives would be turned down.