De Jure Judicial Default Judgment

Linda Cassara
C/O 801 Riverside Park Road
Carlotta, California
RR 95528
Without the U.S.



Linda Cassara                                                                 Claim “at Law”

claimant,                                                                       CASE NO. DR 160135
v.                                                                                        (filed March 15, 2016)

Mark Lovelace, et al.,                                                  DE JURE JUDICIAL
                                                                                    DEFAULT JUDGMENT             wrongdoers.                                                                                    _________________________________________________________________

This is a court of record.

THE COURT, on its own, takes judicial notice of the following:

Let All Men be Known by These Presents That: On the record, for the record, let the record show, The claimant, Linda Cassara, does herewith, WRIT;

A. Claimant, Sui Juris, can competently WRIT the matters set forth herewith;

B. Claimant, Sui Juris, has personal De Jure Judicial knowledge herein this WRIT:

C. For the Law herein this WRIT are true, correct, complete and certain, admissible as evidence, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the best of claimant’s knowledge, in good faith with clean hands.

Claimant asserts that the minute persons under oath as a CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL, and or any other agent and or officer functioning as a CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL, receive any judicial notice or affidavit, it is recorded or put on display in the public. Should you refuse to record or accept any lawful document once deposited with you or in the public refuse to accept, you are committing a crime against justice under Statutes at Large Sec. 5403 and it is punishable by up to a $2000 fine and 3 years imprisonment. If any CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL told you not to record any documents from a California national, you are still responsible, as I do not accept any third party interveners. Anyone who hasn’t recorded an oath and bond that the people do not have public access to view, and hold you as a CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL accountable, or anyone from the lawyering craft, are all third parties and do not have any jurisdiction to make a lawful determination in this matter as you do not represent any of the people. PUBLIC OFFICIALS do not have the right to represent any of the people. 

See Attached Writ of Assistance.

“There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is NOT bound by any institutions formed by his fellow men without his consent.” Cruden vs. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70.

“All Sovereign, private civilian inhabitants shall have free access to all judicial courts in the several states. All clerks and/or deputy shall file all documents of paper for any and/or all-sovereign, private civilian inhabitants; free and without charge of fees.”
-North American Republic Court, U.S. Supreme Court Side for LLC CASE’s see – Crandall vs. State of Nevada, 73 U.S. 35.

Denied A Right: to due process of law. Such denials include(s), denying access to the multiple Constitutional rights and specifically acting against the people, under a color of official right. It is a “trespass action” denying the right to the provisions of the state Constitution, and under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution for the united States of America. Contemptuous of due process and unhindered by conscience, on June 1, 2016 at 1:45 P.M. in Department 8, Dale Reinholtsen condoned the trespassing of a foreign jurisdiction on two cases “at law,” when he aided and abetted BAR member Joseph Ellenwood, a third-party interloper who is Not a Real party of interest in either CASE NO. DR 160161 or CASE NO. 160135. A Summons is also a type of Letter of Demand. If unchallenged, then on appearance, is acceptance of existence of debt, and agreement. A wrongdoer who refuses a summons loses by a default judgment.

Malfeasance Of Office: By such wrongful action, these wrongdoers have acted with malfeasance of office in conspiracy with Agents, deliberately; knowingly and willfully violating land rights, while simultaneously drawing-down the people’s public treasury to purchase opulent vehicles, and adding to the excessive number of corporate personnel during a four-month-long feeding frenzy of unauthorized spending of the unlawful Measure Z, 1/2% TAX Revenue. The following are guilty of misconduct in office, whether public or private: Estelle Fennell, Virginia Bass, Mark Lovelace, Ryan Sundberg, Rex Bohn, Phillip Smith-Hanes, Cheryl Dillingham, Amy Nilsen, Jeffrey Blanck, Joseph Ellenwood, Maggie Fleming, Paul Gallegos, Robert Wall, Jeffrey Dolf, Alan Bongio, Robert Morris, Noah Levy, Kevin McKenney, Lee Ulansey, Ben Shepherd, David Edmunds, John Bartholomew, Carolyn Crnich, Michael Downey, Alec Ziegler, Debbie Provost, Bill Windes, Blake Lehman, Bryan Plumley, Charley Custer, Fred Sundquist, Janna Snell, Nick Angeloff, Rick Poe, Sara Prendergast, Tiffany Christensen.

Slavery: The relation in which a few assume power over the life, fortune, and freedom of the many. The wrongdoers who were served a summons have absolutely refused to communicate in GOOD FAITH with Claimant.

Treason: Treason is defined as the assault against the authority to whom one owes allegiance. It is one of three specific crimes named in the Supreme law of the land. It requires that one commit an act of war against the Constitution, or giving aid and comfort to an enemy. Such clearly defined actions by presumed government officers and such private officers who have privileged authority in commerce by the Constitution, in specific connection to the above violation, malfeasance of office, along with violating their oath of office in the related connected activities. Ones who do not affirm, assert, or does not have an oath and bond recorded in the Humboldt County Land Office, have willfully violated the basic fundamental principles this Country was founded on, and therefore condoned the acts of TREASON by governmental services corporation employees, against claimant, making them liable for such acts of TREASON by refusing to stop such actions against the people, after being noticed by a Declaration of Truth and Facts on December 31, 2014 and January 20, 2015 by a Negative Averment.

Fraud: Permitting shown and demonstrated acts of fraud and actively participate in a scheming conspiracy of untruths and misrepresentations to deceive those who entrusted themselves in dealing in good faith, while specifically acting in deliberate bad faith when such fraud was shown (Cal Penal Code Sec. 532). Commercial “Medical” “Marijuana” Land {use} “Ordinance.”

Extortion: By such actions of Fraud, wrongdoers named and un-named, under assumed (usurped) official right and color of office to demand, without any real lawful or proper authority, such misrepresentations and untruths to steal monies under color and cover of law to raise revenue (Cal Penal Code Sec 518, 519). Measure Z ½% TAX.

Racketeering: Is the combination of the above identified crimes. Title 18 United States Codes Section 1961 (RICO) defines it as involving a host of patterned criminal actions that includes, but not limited to, an act or threat of murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, and as in the instant cases robbery, bribery, extortion, fraud, slavery, etc.

“He who defiles a decision interpreting the Constitution knows precisely what he is doing. If sane, he hardly may be heard to say that he knew NOT what he did. Of course, willful conduct can NOT be made definite that which is NOT defined. But certainly the wrongdoers are in NO position to say that they had NO adequate advance notice that they would be visited with punishment. When they act willfully in the sense to which we use the word, they act in open defiance or reckless disregard of Constitutional requirement.” Screws vs. United States 325 US 91, 65 S. CT. 1031, 89 L. Ed. 1495.

Action for Deprivation of Rights: “The appearance or ‘semblance, without the substance, of legal right…misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken ‘under color of state law.’”

“It is the duty of all officials, whether legislative, judicial, executive, administrative, or ministerial, to so perform every official act as not to violate constitutional provisions.” – Montgomery vs. State, 55 Fla. 97, 45 So. 879.

“Public officials are not immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading Constitutional rights.”— American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO vs. Woodward, 406 F2d 137.

Hence, an “Affidavit” as defined by law is NOT pertaining only to real estate. It is a document of fact for the public record. An Affidavit is a written declaration or statement made voluntarily and confirmed under affirmation. Notices of Defaults may NOT be just a tax default, but a breach of contract that has nothing to do with real estate. Liens are filed and recorded against those who fail to perform according to the terms of their contracts. These Instruments, and many others, are recordable on demand. Failure to do so is a breach of contract and a lienable offense.

Those in the employment of corporate governmental services, who fail to conform to the specific performance of their duties, may be liened by their failure to perform by forfeiture of their personal property. As an employee of the people, you must take an oath of specific performance relating to the Constitution, as did your superiors. You receive moneys from the public trust to perform what is lawful. Any breach of oath, statute or the Constitution can be remedied by perfecting liens against those violating the law. The only acceptable place for such a lien to be filed is the Humboldt County Land Office, as required by law.

Please, also be aware that your failure to record this instrument presented is causing me/We, the people, damage. Your actions appear to me at this point to be done in your individual capacity, because they are outside of your discretion and authority when you refuse to file such an instrument. However, if “the County” is told of your actions, and it ratifies or condones your actions, they will be establishing a policy to violate clearly established rights protected by the 4th and 5th Amendments of the Constitution for the united States of America. In fact, it then becomes a matter of “Conspiracy.”

Conspiracy: A confederation of two or more individuals who may not know each other but, by their joint efforts, commit some unlawful or criminal act (Black’s Law Dictionary). Multiple officials, agents and other persons, who under a cover of official right and appearance and color of law continue to perform such acts, and continue to raise revenue by fraud and extortion for any alleged governmental, function. (Cal Penal Code Sec. 182, California Racketeering Act — Cal Penal Code Sec. 186; 18 USC 241, Federal Racketeering Act, 18 USC 1961 et. seq.)

Title LXX.—CRIMES.— CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying, etc., public records).

SEC. 5403. Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with intent to steal or destroy, takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of justice, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of such court, or any paper, or document, or record filed or deposited in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall, without reference to the value of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than three years, or both: [See § § 5408,5411,5412.1].

Title LXX.—CRIMES.— CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws).

SEC. 5407. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not less than six months nor more than six years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. See § § 1977-1991, 20042010, 5506-5510.1.

Title LXX.—CRIMES.— CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying record by officer in charge).

SEC. 5408. Every officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding specified in section fifty-four hundred and three, who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys any such record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or deposited with him or in his custody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment at hard labor not more than three years, or both-, and shall, moreover, forfeit his office and be forever afterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of the United States.

According to the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America:

“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” And the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Thus, overstanding from these Amendments is that the powers of all united States and State government officials are limited to those specifically granted by the Supreme law of the land.

Claimant further overstands that any laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and procedures contrary to the land jurisdiction, as written by its framers, are null and void, as expressed in the Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177:

“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law, is law. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be signed by all. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail.” This is succinctly stated as follows:

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is not law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.”

“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…”

“A void legal act cannot be lawfully consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.”

“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” And as expressed once again in the Constitution, Article VI:

“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”

All U.S. Inc, USA a foreign corporation, and LLC defacto State government agency’s officials are therefore hereby put on notice that any violations in their contractual obligations to act in accordance with their Constitution for the united States of America, may result in prosecution to the full extent (Jurisprudence), as well as the application of all available Constitutional Bonded remedies to recover damages suffered by secured parties/beneficiaries damaged by any actions of U.S. Inc, USA, “legal fiction State of California government,” (foreign, fiduciary), in violation of/to the North American Republic Treaties, and secured immunities guaranteed in the Constitution created for the united States of America.

I, Linda Cassara, assert that I am Jurisprudence/sui juris and am competent to make this De Jure Judicial Default Judgment, the ½% TAX, Measure Z was, and is, void from its inception.

Humboldt County, California state, uSA North American Republic.

Autographed and sealed on this ______day in June,
Two thousand and Sixteen A.D.

The Court


non-negotiable autograph, under seal and in
service, all rights reserved.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s