An MD Regrets And Apologizes About Vaccine Ignorance: A True Story

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Capture-1024x578Seeing vaccine adverse reactions may not make one a believer, but personally experiencing a vaccine’s adverse effects event makes one become an activist! 

That was the apparent “cause and effect” event from receiving an annual flu vaccine which made one medical doctor decide to investigate what he had not been taught about in medical school, i.e., vaccine ingredients!

According to Dr. David Neides, MD, a former healthcare physician at the Cleveland Clinic, in November of 2016 he was working for a medical facility, which required employees to receive the annual flu vaccine.  He, and four other employees, decided upon and received the “preservative-free” flu vaccine and immediately contracted the flu!  All five of them had the flu and experienced the same symptoms!

 That “aha” event made Dr. Neides check into the flu vaccine ingredients and realize even though the label stated it contained “no preservative,” it contained formaldehyde.  Formaldehyde!  That fact was shocking to him, so he decided to research further into vaccine ingredients.  The further he investigated, the more he became incensed, it seems.

Dr. Neides realized after reading Dr. Paul Thomas’s book, Vaccine Friendly Plan there are some super serious questions to be asked regarding the Hepatitis B vaccines given to infants within 24 hours of birth whereby 250 nanograms of ALUMINUM are injected into newborns whose immune systems are not fully developed!  At that point of his research he realized, “What have I done to my own family?”

As a result of his investigations, Dr. Neides has become a “pro patient” physician who believes in and practices fully-informed consent on the part of the patient.  He believes patients should know the risks versus the benefits.  He further believes in the Geneva Convention’s dictate “no medical intervention without patients’ consent”—something that does not happen regarding the administration of vaccines/vaccinations in the United States.  Parents and healthcare consumers are told vaccines are safe and effective, but not given the information in vaccines package inserts explaining Contraindications, Adverse Reactions, and Ingredients!

Vaccines are in direct violation of the medical oath doctors take: First, do no harm!

Dr. N found there was ethylmercury and aluminum in many vaccines, especially those given to infants, toddlers, and teens, which potentially can and do lead to acute and chronic diseases.

Doctor further relates how he cautioned pregnant females about not eating tuna fish while pregnant due to its mercury content, but he became horror-struck at the fact when he realized he was mandated to give pregnant mothers a flu vaccine containing mercury!  That made no scientific sense to him.

He shares that in medical school there was no education around vaccines; no discussion of the 1986 vaccine law, which exonerates vaccine makers from vaccine damage liabilities; he was taught to memorize the vaccine schedules; there was no discussion of the HRSA vaccine claimants’ damage payouts, which now are close to $4 Billion for vaccine damages to vaccinees!

Furthermore, he’s quick to point out the conflicts of interest regarding physicians and vaccines.  See my August 2017 article “The Unknown Reasons Doctors Push Vaccines.”

However, the most humbling of personality traits Dr. Neides possesses is his genuine remorse for not knowing about vaccines and the harms he inadvertently may have caused patients.  He apologizes profusely in the video below, which is very humbling to see and hear—a medical doctor remorseful for not knowing what he should have known to be able to prevent health harms to patients.

David Neides, MD
32-minute talk before Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom

Dr. Neides says, “We are a very sick population.”  We are spending $3.5 Trillion or 18 percent of GDP on healthcare!  By 2040, we will be spending 33 percent of GDP on healthcare!

Question:  What percentage of that GDP is a manufactured “cause and effect” from the vaccine industry’s pseudoscience of injecting neurotoxic chemicals into newborns, infants, toddlers, teens, adults, and senior citizens?

Dr. Neides is a very brave physician for speaking out factually about vaccines, especially since many doctors who have seen the scientific “light” about vaccine pseudoscience become targeted individuals for various reasons, e.g. harassment, losing medical licenses, and some even have lost their lives under questionable circumstances. Please remember Doctor in your prayers for safety and guidance.  And that many more MDs will follow in his awakening and ability to speak out.

For a better understanding of what many of those toxic chemicals do in the human body, as per science and peer  review studies, but apparently suppressed in allopathic medicine, readers may want to check out my book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

When will Congress fix the problem it created when it passed “The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) [that] was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan as part of a larger health bill on Nov 14, 1986, in the United States, to reduce the potential financial liability of vaccine makers due to vaccine injury claims”?   [Wikipedia]

Advertisements

What have they done with the trust and money we gave them?

Missing on both sides of my road all the way in – wild lilacs and berries all the way around the corner from Martin & Shirley’s. Missing on 36 across from the Carlotta Post Office –California poppies. Missing going west up the hill towards Hydesville -the wild sweet peas. Missing are the VAN DUZEN RIVER GRANGE words across the front of Humboldt’s largest gathering hall built to protect THE LAND. Missing out of the Van Duzen River just slightly east of the Post Office are tons and tons of river rock –just being stashed here and there til plants and grasses grow on the mounds. Added: one big SOIL sign –across from the vacant grange. According to Humboldt’s ‘upstairs-in-the-library’ history books . . .Carlotta was known as the heart of the redwoods. She was complete w/coach and railroad stops, hotel, food, supplies. The soil here was especially praised.

Missing are the Calla lilies in Hydesville, on the right side just before you do a sharp right and go down hill. A huge gully that was year-round green and lush with the most beautiful large white lilies.

Missing in front of 825 Fifth Street, Eureka; every snippet of vegetation (except for a patch of grass and a couple of palm trees) is gone! 

A big corner tree that was by the steps, a bunch of cypress (all wet in the winters and hard to navigate through; they were so thick on the short-cut around the corner to the court file office), here a palm, there a palm, flowers, (both annual and deciduous), ferns, and even the post with a small sign -that i Super glued my signs over (even a front page picture of one in Times Standard!).  Talk about sanitarium.  It was reminiscent of that before, but now . . .i guess its more than apt considering the ‘persons’ pushing papers inside, that add no value to society.

Since Occupy, an elaborate ba$e, with a date of 1920-something on it, has been added to the (redwood, painted white) flagpole.  In the history books, ‘Humboldt County’ (Trinity’ Territory west), happened in 1853.  I have no idea what the year 1925 or 28(?) is supposed to mean.

~i think it’s the Mandela effect of our present parallel uni-verse spelled out for us by the anti-civilization group.

 

Why isn’t June 30, 2017s annual financial report done?

Trump Prepares To Declare California “In State Of Rebellion” -Then Establish New Government

By Anna Von Reitzdismantlethemachine
Regarding All This Talk About Trump Declaring California in Rebellion
 
In the first place, “California” is an actual State of the actual Union of States, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Territorial State of California, Inc., being run by Jerry Brown.

 
The Territorial State of California doing business as the State of California, Inc., being run by Jerry Brown is just a franchise of the Territorial United States being run by Donald J. Trump.  As a result, they truly don’t have any right to “secede” from their parent corporation. It would be like a Dairy Queen franchise in Santa Monica declaring its “independence” from Dairy Queen, Inc.   Can Dairy Queen, Inc., also spin off a new franchise in Santa Monica under a slightly different name—- like New Dairy Queen of Santa Monica?   Or “New (Territorial) State of California” ?  Why not?  

 
Obviously, they have been infringing on our copyrights all the time in all sorts of different ways, substituting their (Territorial) States of States for the (National) States of States we are owed, and playing all sorts of dodgy, dishonest, criminal deceptively-similar name games to promote all this fraud and cause all this trouble on our shores. 
 
I am attaching a text-only chart-like summation of how these disloyal, treasonous British-backed hucksters have undermined and “reconstructed” the federal government we are owed in Gross Breach of Trust.  It’s three pages of charts and one page of explanation that should lay bare the whole bullshit scenario we have been living under and who is responsible for it (the British Queen, the British Crown, and the Pope).
Study it well and distribute it widely so that more Americans and people around the world finally “get it” and we can all be spared another stupid fake mercenary “civil war” at the behest of these insane interlopers.   Please dump it on Trump’s desk and on Putin’s and on Trey Gowdy’s, too.  Give it to Jeff Sessions and all the cretins running the unelected, illegal, irresponsible Senior Executive Service.  Give it to the endlessly perverse Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Shove it up the US Navy’s rear.  Please, be my guest.  Look at what has actually gone on here.  
 
It’s not that hard to understand.  They just dropped certain important words like “Territorial” in “Territorial United States” and “Incorporated” in “the United States of America, Incorporated” —– LOL.  They neglected to tell everyone that what they are really talking about when they say “State of Florida”, for example, is that they are talking about the “Territorial State of Florida, Inc.”—– not any actual National level State of State, much less any of our actual National level States..  All our National Level State of States  that are supposed to be running the “federal government”  have been mothballed and “held in trust” by the same perpetrators of this whole Mess— disguised as land trusts managed by (Territorial) State Legislatures. 
 
Wake up!  Everyone, everywhere!  Wake up!  You’ve been robbed, abused, bamboozled by some schmarmy Wordsmiths, deluding and confusing you about what is what and who is who, worse than the old “Who is on first?” comedy routine. 
 
Mr. Putin needs to be aware.   Donald Trump needs to be aware.  Xi Jinping needs to be aware.   Jerry Brown needs to be aware.  And they all need to be aware that we are all aware.   
 
And this crappola all needs to stop right about now.   If Donald Trump and Jerry Brown think that we are going to be silent while their competing “governmental services” providers stage another bloody fake “Civil War” on our soil, they have another think a-coming.  They BOTH need to STAND DOWN and put a stop to this chicanery right NOW!
 
Unless you want to see 200 outraged American Indian Nations and The United States of America (Unincorporated) show up to a “United Nations” Security Council Meeting and come sit on the Secretary-General’s desk en masse?  And how about we stage a march on Vatican City, while we are at it?  There are more than enough people in Europe who are sick of this wretched criminality, too.  

WHY BUILD THE WALL

Screen Shot 2018-03-12 at 9.26.50 AM
THIS WAS WRITTEN BY A SCHOOL TEACHER/DEPT. MANAGER IN THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL SYSTEM. SHE HAS TO DEAL WITH THESE PROBLEMS EVERY DAY.

THIS ENGLISH TEACHER HAS PHRASED IT THE BEST I’VE SEEN YET.

THIS SHOULD MAKE EVERYONE THINK, BE YOU DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN OR INDEPENDENT.

FROM A CALIFORNIA SCHOOL TEACHER – – –

“As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:

I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large Southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic and income levels.

Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park , etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.

Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I’m not talking a glass of milk and a roll — but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make the Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten.

(OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK!)

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids.

(MORE OF OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK!)

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who
obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America.

(MORE AND MORE OF OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK!)

I have had to intervene several times for young substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less than 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them putas (whores) and throwing things, that the teachers were in tears.

Free medical, free education, free food, day care, etc., etc., etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled not only to be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.

Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc., etc. For me, I’ll pay more for tomatoes.

Americans, We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won’t have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?

It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15, and that refuses to assimilate, and an American culture that has become so weak and
worried about “political correctness” that we don’t have the will to do anything about it.

If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know including your Congressman and Senators.

CHEAP LABOR? ISN’T THAT WHAT THE WHOLE IMMIGRATION ISSUE IS ABOUT?

BUSINESS DOESN’T WANT TO PAY A DECENT WAGE.

CONSUMERS DON’T WANT EXPENSIVE PRODUCE.

GOVERNMENT WILL TELL YOU AMERICANS DON’T WANT THE JOBS.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase “cheap labor” is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as “cheap labor.”

* Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or $6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an “earned income credit” of up to $3,200 free.

ALSO….

HE QUALIFIES FOR SECTION 8 HOUSING AND SUBSIDIZED RENT.

HE QUALIFIES FOR FOOD STAMPS.

HE QUALIFIES FOR FREE (NO DEDUCTIBLE, NO CO-PAY) HEALTH CARE.

HIS CHILDREN GET FREE BREAKFASTS AND LUNCHES AT SCHOOL.

HE REQUIRES BILINGUAL TEACHERS AND BOOKS

HE QUALIFIES FOR RELIEF FROM HIGH ENERGY BILLS.

IF THEY ARE OR BECOME AGED, BLIND OR DISABLED, THEY QUALIFY FOR SSI.

ONCE QUALIFIED FOR SSI THEY CAN QUALIFY FOR MEDICARE. ALL OF THIS IS AT
TAXPAYER’S (OUR) EXPENSE.

HE DOESN’T WORRY ABOUT CAR INSURANCE, LIFE INSURANCE, OR HOMEOWNERS INSURANCE.
HE RECEIVES FREE PHONE, FREE UNLIMITED PHONE SERVICE, DATA, TEXT, WIFI.

TAXPAYERS PROVIDE SPANISH LANGUAGE SIGNS, BULLETINS AND PRINTED MATERIAL.

HE AND HIS FAMILY RECEIVE THE EQUIVALENT OF $20.00 TO $30.00/HOUR IN BENEFITS.

WORKING AMERICANS ARE LUCKY TO HAVE $5.00 OR $6.00/HOUR LEFT AFTER PAYING THEIR BILLS AND HIS.

THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ALSO PAY FOR INCREASED CRIME, GRAFFITI AND TRASH CLEAN-UP.

CHEAP LABOR? YEAH RIGHT! WAKE UP PEOPLE!

THIS HAS GOT TO BE PASSED ALONG TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OR WE WILL ALL GO DOWN THE DRAIN BECAUSE A FEW DON’T CARE.

THIS WILL BE PASSED ON ONLY BY AMERICANS WHO TRULY CARE.

The Deadly Power of Social Compliance

The-PushDylan Charles, Editor
Waking Times

In his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram discusses in detail the findings of his now famous experiment. Milgram demonstrated just how easy it is to convince an ordinary person to commit torture and murder under the instruction of an authority figure.

Intrigued by the role of Nazi military personnel in concentration camps during WWII, Milgram wanted to know how much coercion people needed in order to willingly inflict harm on another person.

“He asked volunteers to deliver an electric shock to a stranger. Unbeknownst to the volunteers, there was no shock—and the people they were shocking were actors pretending to be terribly hurt, even feigning heart attacks. Milgram found that most people would keep delivering the shocks when ordered by a person in a lab coat, even when they believed that person was gravely injured. Only a tiny percentage of people refused.” [Source]

The suggested conclusion is that people are inherently unable to think for themselves when given a subordinate role in some authoritarian hierarchy, such as the role of the ordinary citizen in a state-controlled world. A documentary of this experiment can be seen here.

The Milgram study was controversial in that some felt the results were skewed in favor of a predetermined bias. In the fifty-plus years since the experiment, there have been no other major research studies to confirm Milgram’s findings. Nevertheless, the presumption that normal people will go as far as to commit murder if they are relieved of responsibility by an authority figure feels inherently truthful in a world of so many organized atrocities.

The question is:

“Can we be manipulated through social pressure to commit murder?” ~Derren Brown

It’s an important question at a time when the converging technologies of AI and social media are affecting individual and group psychology in not yet understood ways. British illusionist Derren Brown recently conducted a similar experiment, this time in a feature documentary for Netflix entitled, The Push.

“This show is about how readily we hand over authorship of our lives, everyday, and the dangers of losing that control,” says Brown, who organized the reality TV-like experiment in which ordinary people were duped into doing things most of us would never even consider.

At the heart of the experiment lies the powerful effects of social pressure and social compliance, along with the individual’s inherent need to belong and fit into society. It also questions the nature of individuality, while demonstrating that many of us simply don’t have the courage to assert our own moral courage when faced with even a slight amount of authoritarian pressure.

The Push begins with a phony police officer calling a cafe worker on the phone and in a quick minute, without even a face-to-face interaction, convinces this person to steal a woman’s baby. Interestingly, the worker carries out the abduction even while expressing significant hesitance.

The main experiment picks up from there, involving unwitting subjects who are gradually convinced of the need to push another person off of a high-rise building. It’s an elaborate setup, which builds upon one small act of compliance after another until the subject is put into a situation where they are encouraged to kill a man they just met.

It’s a rather theatrical and unscientific presentation, but the results are noteworthy as three out of four participants actually shove an actor off of a building, believing they are committing murder, after being pressured into it by a small group of others. It’s a shocking act of compliance and subservience to the pressures of a peer group and a persistent authority figure.

What we don’t know about society today, though, is just how many people are this extremely socially compliant, capable of doing anything to appease the directives of others. As Brown notes, “the more socially compliant a person is, the more likely they are to look to others for signs on how to behave. And the more people, the greater the pressure to join in.”

This says a great deal about humans. Are we somehow wired to abandon our own morals and sense of self-integrity for the false belief that fitting into a group is necessary for survival?

From Bill Cooper’s 1991 book “Behold A Pale Horse”

The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use.  This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms.  Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the anti-gun lobby.  This plan is well under way, and so far is working perfectly.  The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment.

Supreme Court sympathetic to Florida man arrested by city officials he criticized

February 27
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. went to the videotape, and he found it “pretty chilling.”

He was talking about the November 2006 meeting of the Riviera Beach City Council in Florida, and the arrest of Fane Lozman, a longtime thorn in the side of council members.

On this day, like many others, Lozman was talking about civic corruption. The presiding council member told him to stop, then called on a police officer to “carry him out.”

“I mean, the fellow is up there for about 15 seconds, and the next thing he knows, he’s being led off in handcuffs, speaking in a very calm voice the whole time,” Roberts said at oral arguments Tuesday as the Supreme Court contemplated an arrest that has turned into a major First Amendment test. “Now, the council may not have liked what he was talking about, but that doesn’t mean they get to cuff him and lead him out.”

 The rest of the court seemed to agree with Roberts, and seemed sympathetic to Lozman, whose suit against the city for allegedly violating his free-speech rights with a retaliatory arrest was thrown out by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

A jury had found that there was probable cause to arrest Lozman, although not for anything he was ever charged with, and he was never actually prosecuted. In the 11th Circuit, although not all others, a finding that an arrest was reasonable is enough to keep a retaliation suit from going forward.

But the problem with siding with Lozman, the justices said, was the effect it could have on police. Officers such as the one who clapped handcuffs on Lozman could be subject to a torrent of lawsuits from people who might claim it was their speech, rather than their actions, that prompted their arrests.

Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall, representing the Justice Department and supporting the city, said the facts in Lozman’s case were unique. “In the real world, I think the far more serious danger is subjecting police departments across the country to claims that are easy to allege and difficult to disprove,” Wall said.

Lozman’s lawyer, Stanford law professor Pamela S. Karlan, had said in briefs that Lozman’s case was important for protesters, journalists and others who faced retaliation from governments they cover or criticize.

“The government violates the First Amendment whenever it retaliates against someone because they . . . criticize public policies or public officials,” Karlan told the justices.

But a broad ruling especially worried Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Stephen G. Breyer. They bombarded Karlan with questions about how the police could be protected from unwarranted lawsuits just for doing their jobs, and did not seem satisfied with her reassurances.

 But when Washington lawyer Shay Dvoretzky rose to represent Riviera Beach, Justice Elena Kagan issued a warning that brought laughter in the courtroom: “Ms. Karlan was having some difficulty with hypotheticals. But you might have some difficulty with the facts of your case.”

Several justices pointed out that council members had met in private to say they were going to send Lozman a message, and that the reason for trying to shut down Lozman’s comments was because he was talking about Palm Beach County rather than Riviera Beach.

“The city is within the county?” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in more of a statement than a question.

But Dvoretzky insisted that there was no easy way for the court to draw lines that protect both Lozman’s case and police and governmental officials. Responded Kennedy: “If that is so, then the First Amendment is in trouble.”

In closing, Karlan narrowed her request, pointing out that the court need only find that probable cause for an arrest does not automatically stop a retaliatory arrest case. Police can always find a pretext for an arrest, she said.

Without giving people like Lozman a remedy to their free-speech claims, she said, “you are giving a green light to every vengeful city council in America to go after people when they demonstrate against abortion clinics, when they demonstrate about police, when they protest zoning decisions.”

The case is Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach.